Laserfiche WebLink
Ar <br />JOHN NORTON - cont. <br />Hugo Planning Commission <br />October 24, 1979 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />Mr. Norton, owner of Lot 7, Block 1, Royalhaven Estates, is requesting <br />authorization to fill his lot to accommodate a house and septic system. <br />In essence, he would be doing the same type of renovations as done on <br />the William Clark property, only he would be using less fill. Mr. Norton <br />has made application with Rice Creek Watershed. McAllister stated that <br />before any action could be taken on the application written comments <br />would be required from Rice Creek, Commissioner of Natural Resources, <br />the City Engineer and the Building Inspector. Mr. Crever is to comment <br />on how long fill has to settle before a septic system can be installed. <br />METRO COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT <br />The following comments were made regarding the Metro Council Policy <br />Statement of August, 1979: <br />2. DEFINITION OF THE REGIONAL PARK SYSTEM (page 3) <br />The system should not include the public facility in the City of Hugo, <br />only those that are connected between one or more municipality and <br />county. <br />3. MASTER PLANS FOR REGIONAL RECREATION OPEN SPACE (page 4) <br />NO to both questions. Metro Council to continue to submit proposals to <br />to the municipality and let the city decide which way they want to go. <br />(2) Should the policy plan distinguish between mast <br />The proposals submitted to the municipality should include all those <br />things. <br />(3) <br />None, other than to encourage continued communication with the muni- <br />cipalities. <br />4. THE NUMBER OF IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES (page 6) <br />(1) Should the Council and Commission limit the number of imple- <br />To do so would be to limit the rights and feelings of each municipality. <br />(2) Should the Council explore ways to phase suburban communities <br />out or the Implementation or re conal parx system pro3ecTs., <br />and to transrer that resgonsibility to the a ro r a e count <br />park au ori Should the _resent structure o im ement <br />agencies be continued? <br />(1) Do not phase out local communities. <br />(2) The present structure in itself might be altered allowing munici- <br />palities more authority and control if desired by the community. <br />