1979.02.14 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Hugo Planning Commission February 14, 1979 Page 3 of 5 PELOQUIN, SCIWARTZ, BERNIER — REZONING Motion made by McAllister, seconded by Peltier, to recommend approval of the requests of Vern Peloquin, David Schwartz, and Robert Bernier to rezone their property from the CB district to the SFE district. VOTING FOR: Peltier, Greger, Gillen, McAllister and Ehret ABSTAINED: Peloquin Motion Carried. RICHARD GENRICH — SPECIAL USE PERMIT Mr. Zimmerman stated that there would be two heavy loads coming in a day, and smaller loads going out. He would not be opposed to the storing of the logs behind the building. be Gillen did not feel there would/any futher deterioration to Goodview Avenue unless the road was wet. Zimmerman stated that the truck would leave for up north at 6:00 AM, return at noon, make a return trip, and be back again at 7:00 PPT. He would construct a building the color determined by the Commission. Gillen stated that auto reduction yards are allowed in the Agriculture zone, and the wood operation is about the same in theory. I-1cAllister said that he was considering the Special Use Permit for the entire 105 acres, but not necessarily in favor of a permit for 25A. Motion made by Greger to table the request until the meeting of 2/28/79 for futher review. Motion failed for lack of second. Mr. Zimmerman stated that the building is being constructed on land in relation to the approved perc test taken. Ehret stated that the permit could be attached to the 105 acres, and could be null and void if the property is sold. Ehret stated that because of the concern expressed over the possible deterioration of Goodview Avenue, he would like to see a report from Howard Kuusisto. Notion made by Greger, seconded by Peloquin, to table the request of Richard Genrich until the meeting of 2/28/79, reason being the report from the City Engineer in regard to the status of Goodview Avenue and possible affect on said road by the use of hea trucks, not to exceed 8 or 10 trips a day (one 21 ton and three 1 ton7. If a Special Use Permit is issued to the applicant as presented (105 acre tract of land), does it address itself to the entire tract of land taking into considera— tion said tract currently has a deed for 80 acres and a deed for 25 acres, and the proposed building site for said request will be on the property on the 25 acre deed. VOTING FOR: Peloquin, Greger, Gillen, ITcAllister and Ehret ABSTAINED: Peltier Motion Carried.