My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1979.02.14 PC Minutes
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1979 PC Minutes
>
1979.02.14 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2015 6:04:15 PM
Creation date
3/2/2015 11:02:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
2/14/1979
Document Type
Minutes
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hugo Planning Commission <br />February 14, 1979 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />PELOQUIN, SCIWARTZ, BERNIER — REZONING <br />Motion made by McAllister, seconded by Peltier, to recommend approval <br />of the requests of Vern Peloquin, David Schwartz, and Robert Bernier <br />to rezone their property from the CB district to the SFE district. <br />VOTING FOR: Peltier, Greger, Gillen, McAllister and Ehret <br />ABSTAINED: Peloquin <br />Motion Carried. <br />RICHARD GENRICH — SPECIAL USE PERMIT <br />Mr. Zimmerman stated that there would be two heavy loads coming in <br />a day, and smaller loads going out. He would not be opposed to the <br />storing of the logs behind the building. <br />be <br />Gillen did not feel there would/any futher deterioration to Goodview <br />Avenue unless the road was wet. <br />Zimmerman stated that the truck would leave for up north at 6:00 AM, <br />return at noon, make a return trip, and be back again at 7:00 PPT. He <br />would construct a building the color determined by the Commission. <br />Gillen stated that auto reduction yards are allowed in the Agriculture <br />zone, and the wood operation is about the same in theory. <br />I-1cAllister said that he was considering the Special Use Permit for <br />the entire 105 acres, but not necessarily in favor of a permit for 25A. <br />Motion made by Greger to table the request until the meeting of 2/28/79 <br />for futher review. Motion failed for lack of second. <br />Mr. Zimmerman stated that the building is being constructed on land <br />in relation to the approved perc test taken. Ehret stated that the <br />permit could be attached to the 105 acres, and could be null and void <br />if the property is sold. <br />Ehret stated that because of the concern expressed over the possible <br />deterioration of Goodview Avenue, he would like to see a report from <br />Howard Kuusisto. <br />Notion made by Greger, seconded by Peloquin, to table the request of <br />Richard Genrich until the meeting of 2/28/79, reason being the report <br />from the City Engineer in regard to the status of Goodview Avenue and <br />possible affect on said road by the use of hea trucks, not to exceed <br />8 or 10 trips a day (one 21 ton and three 1 ton7. If a Special Use <br />Permit is issued to the applicant as presented (105 acre tract of land), <br />does it address itself to the entire tract of land taking into considera— <br />tion said tract currently has a deed for 80 acres and a deed for 25 acres, <br />and the proposed building site for said request will be on the property <br />on the 25 acre deed. <br />VOTING FOR: Peloquin, Greger, Gillen, ITcAllister and Ehret <br />ABSTAINED: Peltier <br />Motion Carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.