Laserfiche WebLink
_6_ <br /> zoning. Schwab stated that only under a PUD, Hugo's Hu o's ordinance <br /> permit such zoning. There was some discussion concerning PUD's and <br /> Carl Dale said that the more common conception of a PUD is in a more <br /> urban situation but they could be utilized in the rural situation. <br /> Schwab said that when talking density, we should also be considering <br /> g <br /> how large the largest lot should be and how small the smallest one <br /> should be. <br /> Lease expressed concern that in Jerry Moe's case, where he was <br /> asking for a.:rezo ijg from Conservancy to Agricultural, Which is ten <br /> acre lot minimum and then was asking to have ten lots in only 95* acres <br /> He stated he wasn't even sure they should be changing his land from <br /> Conservancy to Agricultural, Carl Dale agreed thathe would have to <br /> have some pretty strong arguments to ask for 10 lots in. .95i acres. <br /> Spitzer stated that our present zoning doesn't permit either cluster <br /> or density zoning unless it is under the PUD phase of the ordinance. <br /> Leroux said he didn't feel a PUD should be in a rural area. Irene <br /> Leroux said she felt it could be used in the Agricultural area if the <br /> �1' <br /> building sit are big enough. <br /> Council agreed with Spitzer that the only way density zoning could <br /> be considered was under the PUD, and the Planning Commission should <br /> view future applications of this type as being acceptable. <br /> accs table. <br /> It was the conoensue of the group that Jerry Moe has two alter- <br /> natives. He can either have uniform lot sizes that meet the zoning <br /> requirements or apply for a PUD. <br /> Spitzer suggested that perhaps the ordinance should be amended to <br /> include density zoning. <br /> 3) It was the c oncensus of the groupthat hard surfaced roads are <br /> a <br /> requirement of the city, except where lot sizes are four acres or over, <br />