My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016.01.13 Parks Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Parks
>
Parks Commission
>
Parks Commission Agenda/Packets
>
2016
>
2016.01.13 Parks Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2016 4:09:28 PM
Creation date
6/23/2016 12:52:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
1/13/2016
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Parks
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TRAVEL TIME TO THE LIBRARY — In concert with placing libraries near population centers, <br />studies have shown that the closer a library is to a person's home, the more likely an individual <br />is to use it. A reasonable benchmark is that most households will not regularly use a library if it <br />is more than 15 minutes from one's home. Thus, successful libraries are usually placed near <br />population centers and/or other high traffic areas, such as business, commercial or shopping <br />districts. Washington County does have areas, such as the northeastern and southeastern <br />sectors, that have relatively sparse populations compared to the larger communities in the <br />County. These areas are also not expected to grow significantly in terms of population. Rather <br />than drive time for these locations, factors such as the nearest larger commercial districts that <br />these residents use may determine library placement. <br />WORK AND EMPLOYMENT PATTERNS — How the majority of a population works or how they <br />travel to work can impact the type, size, and location of libraries. For instance, a large <br />percentage of Washington County residents do not work in the County, so locating libraries on <br />well -traveled transportation corridors for ease of access before or after work is a likely <br />consideration. <br />ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT— Public libraries, particularly large libraries, often attract hundreds <br />of people to a location daily. In general, most people, make more than one stop when running <br />errands, and some communities have used new libraries to stimulate new growth and <br />economic development in an area or region. More broadly, some communities have marketed <br />new libraries as a community amenity, alongside good schools and parks, to attract new <br />businesses or developments to the area. <br />TYPE OF SFRVICF MODEL AND LIBRARY — There is no one model for public libraries today, and <br />there are multiple service models and types of facilities that can match community needs most <br />effectively. For example, Washington County currently has at least four different service <br />models of libraries in the County. That said, a simple juxtaposition is whether to build one <br />large, regional, full-service library or multiple small, community -oriented libraries. There are <br />advantages and disadvantages to both models. The large libraries are usually more efficient <br />and cost-effective, can provide a much broader range of services, and typically have longer <br />hours. Smaller, community-based libraries are better able to meet specific community needs, <br />and build stronger attachments and sometimes per capita use. For the diversity of Washington <br />County, one would expect to have multiple service models, as currently exists, to serve the <br />population well. Thus a mix of large, regional libraries; medium size area libraries; smaller <br />community libraries; express locker -type libraries; and perhaps some newer, innovative models, <br />may best fit the make-up of the County system in the future. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.