My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016.07.18 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2016 CC Packets
>
2016.07.18 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2016 2:20:42 PM
Creation date
8/15/2016 2:18:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
7/18/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Terre De L'eau - Sketch Plan <br />Page 4 <br />Sketch Plan <br />The applicant is proposing to subdivide the existing 197.5 -acre site to create 296 residential <br />home sites. The R-3 zoning district requires a minimum lot width of 80 feet. The applicant is <br />proposing a combination of product types and lot widths listed below: <br />Product Type <br />Proposed Lot Width <br />Proposed No. of Lots <br />Villa Homes (maintenance provided) <br />45 feet <br />91 <br />Detached Townhomes (maintenance provided) <br />50 feet <br />51 <br />Single Famil Homes <br />65 feet <br />33 <br />Single Family Homes <br />70 feet <br />60 <br />Single Family Homes <br />90 feet <br />61 <br />The applicant is proposing the following setbacks: <br />Yard <br />R-3 Zonin District Minimum <br />Proposed Setback <br />Front <br />30 feet <br />25 feet <br />Side <br />10 feet <br />5 feet/ 10 feet 15 feet total between homes <br />Rear <br />30 feet <br />30 feet <br />The applicant has done a good job providing a mix of housing products and providing <br />connections between the adjacent neighborhoods as encouraged by the neighborhood pattern and <br />housing goals section of the Comprehensive Plan. The transitions between product types has <br />been thought through and generally works well. The applicant has also provided natural buffers <br />between the proposed development and the existing neighborhoods as to not have lots directly <br />back up to the existing lots. In general staff is comfortable with the mix of hosing products and <br />where they are located on the site. <br />The City has approved smaller lot size and lot widths for detached townhomes and villa housing <br />products. There are several natural resources on the site that the applicant is trying to preserve by <br />the development layout. There is also development difficulty with the powerline and pipeline <br />easements. Therefore, reduced setbacks and smaller lots sizes would allow the developer to <br />maintain the natural topography, trees, and wetland features of the site. Since the product types <br />have not been submitted for review by staff, it's difficult to determine whether all of the <br />proposed lot widths would work with the proposed setbacks. As the project moves forward, the <br />applicant will need to provide the elevations of the product types and show how they will fit on <br />the proposed lots. The City Council and Commissions should comment on the proposed lot size <br />and lot widths. <br />Zoning Change <br />The applicant will be requesting a rezoning from R-3 to PUD. The developer is requesting a <br />PUD to allow development flexibility for lot width, lot size, and setbacks. In exchange for this <br />flexibility, the city expects a higher level of design and amenities within a project. The applicant <br />has indicated that they will provide landscaped streets, decorative lighting, trails, a public park <br />and stormwater reuse system to irrigate the park and home sites. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.