My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016.08.25 PC Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2016 PC Packets
>
2016.08.25 PC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2016 2:36:39 PM
Creation date
8/22/2016 2:29:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
8/25/2016
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Kelly Minor Subdivision & Variance <br />a. Reasonable Use. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable <br />manner notpermitted by the Zoning ordinance and; <br />The applicant is requesting to split the 20 acre property into a 15 acre parcel and a 5 acre <br />parcel. The house and the accessory building will be located on the proposed 5 acre <br />parcel, and with the exception of the lot size it still meets all zoning requirements. The <br />applicants request to create a 15 acre parcel for a residential lot is reasonable. <br />b. Unique Circumstances. The plight of property owner is due to circumstances <br />unique to the property not created by the landowner and; <br />The property is unique in that it is 20 acres allowing for a density of 1 dwelling unit per <br />10 acres, but the eastern half is not buildable due to wetlands and floodplain. In order to <br />reasonably use the property to allow an additional dwelling unit, a variance is needed to <br />create a 5 acre parcel on the west side. <br />Because of the natural resources on the east half of the property, access from Keystone is <br />not feasible without impacting the floodplain and wetlands. There is a small area that is <br />not wetland on the east half along Keystone, but it does not meet soil requirements for a <br />septic system. Therefore, in order to subdivide the parcel to allow for an additional <br />dwelling, a variance is needed for a smaller lot on the western portion of the site. <br />The applicant has stated that the parcel is uniquely set up for the proposed split because <br />the house and accessory building is on the west side of the property. The proposed split <br />will maintain conformance with setback and lot dimension requirements. <br />C. Character of the Neighborhood. The variance, if granted, will not alter the <br />essential character of the neighborhood. <br />The property is in the Agricultural (AG) zoning district and located in an area that <br />includes parcels that do not meet the minimum lot size requirement. The proposed split <br />would result in lot widths larger or typical to a 10 acre lot. The subdivision would create <br />two lots that will be visually consistent with the surrounding area and will not alter the <br />character of the area. <br />3. Spirit and Intent. The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of this chapter and with the policies of the city's comprehensive plan. <br />The spirit and intent of the ordinance (lot size) is generally to create enough space for a <br />dwelling, accessory buildings, sewage treatment systems, wells, driveways and other <br />elements typically needed or found on large rural residential parcels. The applicant is <br />requesting one of the lots to be 5 acres, where 10 acres is required by ordinance. The 15 <br />acre lot will exceed minimum lot size requirement. There is enough room on both <br />properties for the elements typically found on large rural residential parcels. The <br />subdivision meets the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.