Laserfiche WebLink
Council Comprehensive Planning Residents Support <br /> Establishes Plan Update Commission Mandatory <br /> Priorities Continues Appointments Garbage PickuF. <br /> After conducting sev- The Hugo Planning Asa result of recent res- Hugo residents re- <br /> eral open hearings,the City Commission is continuing its ignations, the City Council sponded by a narrow margin <br /> Council established what it review and recommenda- has appointed Mr. Ken in support of an ordinance <br /> felt was the City's top five tions for the City's compre- Rubenzer, 6141 Egg Lake requiring all Hugo residences <br /> priorities for 1992. The hensive plan.The City's first Rd., and Mr. Brian Olson, to have garbage and refuse <br /> Council's top priority was comprehensive plan, which 13037 Elmcrest Ave. to the service by licensed haulers. <br /> acquisition of a well site and was adopted in the 1980's,is Hugo Planning Commis- In a vote of 148 for,and 141 <br /> construction of a new well being updated to comply sion. Mayor Stoltzman has against, Hugo residents felt <br /> and water system improve- with Metro Council's System requested that any citizen in- that all Hugo homes and busi- <br /> ments. Second priority was Statement and to reflect the terested in serving on City nesses should have some type <br /> acquisition of a new fire changing needs of the com- Boards and Commissions, of licensed refuse removal <br /> truck,third priority was ex- munity. Hugo citizens will note their interest in writing service. Currently, there are <br /> pansion of the fire hall and have an opportunity to pro- so that they can be invited over 500 residences in the City <br /> City Hall facilities. Fourth vide input at the Planning for interviews when vacan- of Hugo that have no ap- <br /> priority was the maintenance Commission level when cies occur.Letters of interest proved garbage service,and <br /> of public drainage ditches, hearings are held prior to should be sent to City Hall in their garbage is being dis- <br /> and their fifth priority was making plan changes. care of Mayor Stoltzman. posed of by some other <br /> recodification of the City's Tax Increase County Road J means,either legally or ille- <br /> ordinances. Covers Lost LGA Plans Approved gally. <br /> Pole Barn Issue The primary cause of Last fall,the Hugo City Citizens Say No to <br /> Studied local tax increases to fund the Council approved plans for Rural/Commercial <br /> The Hugo City Council City's 1992 budget was a re- the County Road J improve- Mix <br /> is in therocess of studying sult of the loss of approxi- ment project from Highway <br /> p � g a 1 The results of the Ci <br /> the often controversial issue mately$30,000 in Local Gov- 61, east approximately /2 recent community deve. <br /> of le barns in the Cit Cur- ernment Aids and increased mile. Following acquisition - <br /> 1� Y• ment questionnaire indicated <br /> rently, the City allows pole debt service.The City's gen- of the needed right-of-way that Hugo citizens over- <br /> barns as accessorybuildings eral government spending in- for the widening of this road, <br /> gs creased b less than 2% in it is anticipated that road con- whelmingly oppose the mix- <br /> in rural areas. The Council Y p ing of commercial or indus- <br /> will be considering whether 1991,and it will increase 3.4% struction could begin in 1992. trial businesses in the rural/ <br /> or not to allow pole barns as in 1992.As the City's service This joint project involving residential areas of the com- <br /> principal <br /> om <br /> rind al structures on prop- contracts continue to increase Ramsey Count, White Bear <br /> p p p � at a faster rate than taxes can Township, and the City of munity. When asked if the <br /> erty that does not have a p' City should allow light in- <br /> home onsite.The Cit Coun- be levied, expect other Hugo has been in the works <br /> Y sources of revenue to increase for over five ears,with most dustrial or commercial in ag- <br /> cil is somewhat divided on Y ricultural and conservancy <br /> this issue, as some are con- in an effort to maintain the of the project funding com- districts, 204 residents indi- <br /> cerned about commercial current service levels pro- ing from Federal Aid Urban <br /> and industrial uses encroach- vided to Hugo residents. Grants. Gated their opposition,while <br /> 103 supported this change. <br /> ing into the rural and resi- Questionnaire To go one step further,Hugo <br /> dential areas, while others Highlights Dial 911 residents voted 191 against, <br /> feel current ordinances are Other results of the com- for emergencies and 114 for, allowing light- <br /> too restrictive. The Council munity development question- 439-9381 commercial home occupa- <br /> has suggested an ordinance naire sent to Hugo residents tions in accessory buildings <br /> change addressing this issue, g for other law within residential areas. <br /> indicated the community's <br /> and will be seeking citizens' enforcement <br /> input regarding pole barn overwhelming opposition to services <br /> construction and how they the following:a brush removal <br /> program in rural ditches, tax <br /> will be dealt with in the fu- <br /> increases to finance downtown City Staff <br /> ture. capital improvements,tougher Ken Huber City Administrator <br /> animal control laws, and the John Benson.....................................Building Inspecto <br /> financing of a curbside recy- Mary Ann Creager ...................................... City Clerk <br /> cling program and spring Carole LaBelle............................................Deputy Clerk <br /> cleanup weekend. Ron Otkin...........................................Finance Director <br /> ,.... <br /> :•:i}:;:;:;:;:;{.$:'.:;:•,: :v:{7::•>.;.;.;,; ; js';::•:�:•:v}:•}} ;{::•:•:�?:•?:•:��:•:•$:•?:•:•:">:•$::v:�:•:•::;{:;::•'r:v:may,:;{:::::•::•�:�?{:;{} ::�:{:�:•:};:?.:,:; >::':;�:::}:.'•'r}}:�:•:•:�:v:•::::.�:.�:::::::.•::::v:{::v::: <br /> City of Hugo Newsletter Page 2 <br />