My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017.04.17 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2017 CC Packets
>
2017.04.17 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2020 3:53:30 PM
Creation date
5/12/2017 1:58:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
4/17/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
434
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 4 <br />There were five residents that spoke during the sketch plan review meeting. One stated the sketch <br />plan showed exactly the project needed for this lot and that it is better than past proposals for this <br />lot. The other residents voiced concerns on the following: <br />• The proposed density of the project. <br />• The proposed lot size and lot width in relation to the allowance in the R-3 zoning district. <br />• Traffic <br />o Potential for cut -through traffic on 137th Street <br />o Additional traffic along 130th Street <br />• The location of stormwater ponds in relation to the existing homes in regards to flooding, <br />bugs, and odors. <br />• They wanted to ensure that the Commissions and City Council kept the neighboring <br />properties in mind during the approval process. <br />The Parks Commission also reviewed the sketch plan, at that time, and provided informal <br />comments in regards to trails, park improvements, and park dedication. In general the Parks <br />Commission liked the proposal, but realized there are several details to work out. The Parks <br />Commission provided the following comments: <br />• They liked the trails within the development and encouraged additional connections from <br />the adjacent neighborhoods to the active park area. <br />• They encouraged the trail along the north side of 130th Street to be constructed with the <br />development. <br />• They stated they were comfortable with the active park location but, encouraged a more <br />contiguous park area. <br />• They also stated they were comfortable with the use of the City owned outlot for the <br />passive park area, stormwater pond, and trails. <br />• They thought the developer was on track with the park dedication proposal. <br />• They stated that more analysis and discussion will need to occur in regards to phasing of <br />the trail and park improvements within the development. <br />It is in staff's opinion that the applicant has done a good job addressing the comments and <br />concerns from the proposed sketch plan of the City Council, Commissions, and residents. <br />3. CONTEXT: <br />A. Surrounding land Use and Zoning <br />The property to the north is zoned Low Density Multiple Family Residential (R-4) and occupied <br />by the Pineview Meadows townhome development. The properties to the east, south, and west <br />are zoned Single Family Detached Residential (R-3) and occupied by the Country Ponds, Beaver <br />Ponds, and Birch Tree Ponds residential developments. The properties to the west, across <br />Highway 61, are zoning General Industrial (I-3) and are occupied by industrial uses. There are <br />also a few vacant parcels to the east that are also zoned Single Family Detached Residential (R- <br />3). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.