Laserfiche WebLink
Adelaide Landing Residential Development EAW, Hugo January 31, 2017 <br />The proposed project is compatible with existing land uses and planned land uses in the area <br />because it offers single-family and detached townhomes and densities next to the potential Rush <br />Line Transitway corridor, consistent with implementation of the 2010 Hugo Comprehensive <br />Land Use Plan. Further, connections to this property have been made with existing adjacent <br />development. Portions of the project are also planned as public open space to include active and <br />passive park consistent with the 2030 Parks System Plan adopted as part of the 2010 Parks, <br />Trails and Open Space Plan. <br />c. Identify measures incorporated into the proposed project to mitigate any potential <br />incompatibility as discussed in Item 9b above. <br />Incompatibility of land uses is not anticipated as discussed in Section 9b. <br />10. Geology, soils and topography/land forms: <br />a. Geology - Describe the geology underlying the project area and identify and map any susceptible <br />geologic features such as sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, unconfined/shallow aquifers, or <br />karst conditions. Discuss any limitations of these features for the project and any effects the project <br />could have on these features. Identify any project designs or mitigation measures to address effects <br />to geologic features. <br />Topographic mapping indicates that elevations on the site range from approximately 926 to 940 feet <br />above mean sea level. The highest elevations occur along the western perimeter, northwest corner, <br />and southern section of the site. The lowest elevations occur in the southeast corner and through the <br />center of the site. According to the Washington County Atlas C-6, Plate 5, the groundwater table <br />elevation within the site is around 925 feet. Groundwater elevations fluctuate from season to season <br />and year to year. Groundwater elevations observed within the geotechnical boreholes during drilling <br />operations at 20 different locations across the site ranged from 6 to 10 feet below grade. <br />Piezometer readings collected at six locations on the site from March 24, 2016 to January 26, 2017 <br />indicate that the average depth to water at these locations was approximately 3 feet below grade <br />during that period (elevations of around 927 to 930). During dryer months, groundwater elevations <br />were observed in the 6-7 foot depth range at a couple of the piezometer locations. <br />Depth to bedrock was estimated from The Geologic Atlas of Washington County, Minnesota C-39, <br />Plate 6, Depth to Bedrock map (2016). The Geologic Atlas indicates that the distance from the land <br />surface to bedrock ranges between approximately 51 to 100 feet. <br />The Geologic Atlas of Washington County, Minnesota Data -Base maps (C-5, Plate 1 (1990) and C- <br />39, Plate 1 (2016)) and associated GIS data indicate there are no known sinkholes, exposed bedrock, <br />springs, or seeps on or near the site. In addition, no kart areas are mapped within or near the site <br />based on Minnesota Karst Lands Mapping (Alexander 2002) and MN DNR Minnesota Regions <br />Prone to Surface Karst Feature Development GIS data (2015). If such features are encountered on <br />the site during planned subsurface investigations, actions will be taken to mitigate potential effects <br />such as stormwater routing, soil stabilization, and groundwater protection practices. <br />The Geologic Atlas of Washington County, Minnesota, C-5, Plate 6, Sensitivity of Groundwater <br />Systems to Pollution map (1990) indicates that the sensitivity of groundwater to pollution in the <br />project areas is generally high (H) to very high (VH). Mapping also indicated that sensitivity of the <br />10 <br />