My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017.08.21 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2017 CC Packets
>
2017.08.21 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2017 9:01:52 AM
Creation date
8/18/2017 8:53:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
8/21/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Agenda Number: G.3 <br />CITY OF HUGO <br />PLANNING AND ZONING <br />APPLICATION <br />STAFF REPORT <br />TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator <br />FROM: Rachel Juba, Planner <br />SUBJECT: Elmcrest Investments, LLC. Request for an amendment to the <br />preliminary plat and PUD for "Fable Hill 4th Addition" to add 3 lots to the <br />preliminary plat. <br />DATE: August 16, 2017, for the City Council meeting of August 21, 2017 <br />ZONING: Planned Unit Development (PUD) <br />DEADLINE DATE: August 25, 2017 <br />1. PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE: <br />At its August 10, 2017, meeting the Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered <br />the application request. There were four residents that spoke during the public hearing. Some <br />asked questions about the phasing of the project and questioned adding additional villa home to <br />the project. The developer stated that the project would happen in two phases and that the project <br />was approved for a number of villa homes, the amendment is asking for 3 more units. There was <br />a resident that asked about putting a dead end sign at the cul-de-sac to discourage people from <br />going down the street thinking they can get to Elmcrest Avenue. Staff stated they would discuss <br />with the public works department and get back to the resident. There was a resident that spoke in <br />favor of the application request and stated that there is not a traffic problem. <br />There was one email that was submitted to public record asking for another access into the <br />development from Elmcrest with any new approvals to the Fable Hill development. The email <br />further stated that there has been a lot of construction traffic in the development. Staff explained <br />that this phase has been approved and this is an amendment to add 3 units. The applicant was not <br />required to have an additional access with the approval. If the development is expanded with a <br />new request, an additional access would be evaluated then, but not needed for this request. <br />The Planning Commission was comfortable with the application request and thought it meet the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.