Laserfiche WebLink
EMINENT DOMAIN TALKING POINTS <br /> A few facts: <br /> • The Kelo vs. New London Connecticut case did not expand eminent <br /> domain authority in Minnesota <br /> • Minnesota Cities use eminent domain sparingly, as a last resort and <br /> overwhelmingly for traditional public uses such as roads or utilities <br /> • Primary users of eminent domain for subsequent private development <br /> are the core cities, inner-ring suburbs and older Metro Area cities <br /> • Primary use of eminent domain by these cities is for revitalization <br /> activities including blight removal and contamination cleanup <br /> • Many eminent domain actions are non-controversial and initiated in <br /> order to arrive at an agreeable purchase price or provide the seller with <br /> a federal tax break <br /> • The Twin Cities Metro Area enjoys a nationally recognized reputation for <br /> being very "livable". The reputation is due, in part, to its economically, <br /> socially and culturally vital urban core. <br /> • Our vital urban core is not an accident. The vitality is the result of on- <br /> going public and private efforts to reinvest and revitalize. Imagine our <br /> core cities and inner-ring suburbs without Medtronic, U.S. Bank, the <br /> Target Center, Xcel Center, Lawson Software and others. (Eminent <br /> domain was not used on all of these projects. But all are examples of <br /> redevelopment that will be at risk if we effectively eliminate the tool for <br /> redevelopment.) <br /> • Redevelopment activities address specific problems with specific sites. <br /> But redevelopment is also initiated to stabilize neighborhoods and <br /> business districts and protect the investments on adjacent and nearby <br /> private property <br /> Association of Metropolitan Municipalities and the League of Minnesota Cities <br /> 145 University Avenue West,St.Paul,MN 55103-2044 <br /> AMM: 651-215-4000 and LMC: 651-281-1200 <br />