My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006.04.17 EDA Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
EDA
>
EDA Agenda/Packets
>
2006 EDA Packets
>
2006.04.17 EDA Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2017 1:21:06 PM
Creation date
8/24/2017 1:21:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
4/17/2006
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
EDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f <br /> Z , <br /> MACTA is a non-profit association representing 105 cities and 9 townships in <br /> Minnesota. MACTA was formed in 1982 as a trade association supporting its member cities by <br /> providing educational, networking, and legislative/regulatory assistance in areas relating to cable <br /> television and telecommunications. MACTA members include cities, cable commissions, <br /> community cable TV facilities, and advisors working with these organizations. <br /> INTRODUCTION <br /> The Minnesota local franchising authorities represented by the LMC and the MACTA <br /> (hereinafter collectively, "LFAs") wish to reply to initial comments submitted by the Minnesota <br /> Telecom Alliance ("MTA") and Qwest Communications International, Inc. ("Qwest"). As set <br /> forth in our initial comments, LFAs in Minnesota have been managing communications <br /> competition for many years and are excited to embrace competition in the video arena. LFAs are <br /> not barriers to entry, but rather simply following the policies set forth in state and federal law. <br /> These policies encourage competition but also seek to ensure that no provider is given an unfair <br /> competitive advantage over the other. LFAs are uniquely positioned to ensure that video <br /> providers meet each community's needs and interests in a fair and equitable manner. LFAs are <br /> also in the best position to ensure that provider obligations are enforced. The Commission <br /> should promote policies and regulations which protect LFAs' authority to supervise rights-of- <br /> way, require the payment of a reasonable franchise fee as compensation for the use of such <br /> rights-of-way and require sufficient outlets for local expression and appropriate institutional <br /> network obligations. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.