My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006.09.18 EDA Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
EDA
>
EDA Agenda/Packets
>
2006 EDA Packets
>
2006.09.18 EDA Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2017 1:32:52 PM
Creation date
8/24/2017 1:32:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
9/18/2006
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
EDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
State considering construction code and <br /> licensing proposals <br /> Laura Harris <br /> During the last few months,the state Department of 2) The municipality agrees to review plumbing plans/ <br /> Labor and Industry (DLI) has convened government and specifications for all construction and to perform all <br /> industry stakeholders to discuss legislative changes that are inspections required by the plumbing code. <br /> needed to complete the merger of the state's construction 3) Individuals who will conduct inspections and plan/ <br /> code and licensing activities into a single state agency— specification reviews for the municipality do not have <br /> the Construction Codes and Licensing Division(CCLD). a conflict of interest. <br /> This new division,which was authorized by a reorganiza- 4) Individuals who will conduct plan/specification <br /> tion order issued by the governor in April 2005,regulates reviews for the municipality are licensed master <br /> building codes and standards,boilers and high-pressure plumbers;licensed professional engineers;or indi- <br /> piping,electrical licensing and inspection,plumbing and viduals who are working under the supervision of <br /> engineering,and residential building contractors. a licensed professional engineer and who:a) are <br /> The Legislature considered a bill (HF 3525/SF licensed plumbers,b) hold a post-secondary degree <br /> 3176) in the 2006 session to complete this consolidation; in engineering,or c) are certified by a national model <br /> however,the legislation was not enacted.As a result,the code organization on plumbing systems. <br /> department has been seeking input from various stake- 5) Individuals who will conduct plumbing inspections <br /> holders with a goal of developing a new proposal for the for the municipality are:licensed master plumb- <br /> 2007 session. ers;licensed professional engineers;certified lim- <br /> Several provisions under consideration by the depart- ited building officials;certified building officials;or <br /> ment would affect local government operations relating to inspectors meeting the competency requirements <br /> construction code administration and enforcement.The established in rule. <br /> League is interested in hearing from local officials about 6) The municipality agrees to keep official records <br /> the impacts of the following proposals: related to plumbing inspections and plan/specifica- <br /> Licensing and bond requirements for electrical inspec- tion reviews and to maintain these records in accor- <br /> tors. This proposal would require all electrical inspectors dance with state record retention requirements. <br /> to hold licenses as master or journeyman electricians,and 7) The municipality and the commissioner agree that if <br /> inspectors under contract with DLI to pay a$1,000 bond. the municipality is not properly enforcing the plumbing <br /> Licensure verification for building contractors/remod- code,the commissioner may terminate the agreement <br /> elers. Another provision would require a local govern- and undertake administration and enforcement of the <br /> ment to verify licensure of building contractors and plumbing code,and the municipality may challenge the <br /> remodelers before issuing a permit.Cities are currently determination as a contested case under the APA. <br /> prohibited from issuing building,zoning or land use 8) The municipality and the commissioner agree that <br /> permits to unlicensed persons (see Minn.Stat.326.921), the municipality shall forward to the state for review <br /> and have permissive authority to verify licensure and all plumbing plans/specifications for the certain <br /> charge$5 per permit to cover costs of license verifica- health care facilities,state and federal buildings,and <br /> tion (Minn.Stat.326.86,subd. 1). other projects of a special nature upon request of the <br /> Agreements with municipalities to perform plumbing municipality of the department. <br /> inspections and plan reviews. The department is consid- State vs.municipal bond requirement for plumbing <br /> ering a new provision that would regulate agreements contractors. This proposal would replace local bond <br /> relating to plumbing inspection and plan/specification requirements on plumbing contractors with a state bond. <br /> review.The proposal would allow the commissioner to However,it would still allow a city,town or the Metro- <br /> enter into an agreement with a municipality to perform politan Airports Commission to enforce performance <br /> plumbing inspections and plan/specification reviews if: bonds that are required under a contract for plumbing <br /> 1) The municipality has adopted the plumbing code and work for the local government. <br /> agrees to enforce the plumbing code on all projects. Continued on page 9 <br /> Page 8 LMC Cities Bulletin September 13, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.