Laserfiche WebLink
MAY-19-2005 15:57 LEAGUE OF P1N CITIES 6512811296 P.05 <br /> — • Meetings to evaluate the performance of an;ne victual subject to the <br /> public body's authority, <br /> Mimi.Stat §§1:3D.05,subd..4(a)1 Procedure. The following must be done to use this exception: <br /> 131).01,suhd. <br /> i. The public body must identify the individual to be <br /> evaluated prior to closing the meeting. <br /> ii. The meeting must be open at the request of the <br /> individual who is the subject of the meeting, so some <br /> advance notice to the individual is needed in order to <br /> allow the individual to make an informed decision. <br /> iii. Before closing the meeting,the council must state on <br /> the record the specific grounds permitting the meeting <br /> to be closed and describe the subject to be discussed. <br /> iv, At the next open meeting,the public body must <br /> summarize its conclusions regarding the evaluation. <br /> The council should be careful not to release private or <br /> confidential data in its summary. <br /> Minn.Stitt.§13D.05,subd.i(b). . Attorney-client privilege. Meetings between the governing body and its <br /> PriorLrike.line vicmr v.Mader, attorney to discuss active,threatened,or pending litigation may be closed <br /> Goa N,w,24 729(Minn,20021, when the balancing of the purposes served by the attorney-client privilege <br /> Northwest Publicatioru,Inc.v. against those served by the open meeting law dictates the need for <br /> Ciiy of St,Paul,435 N.W2d 64 absolute confidentiality.The need for absolute confidentiality should <br /> (Minn.App.1989). relate to litigation strategy,and will usually arise only after a substantive <br /> decision on the underlying matter has been made.This privilege may not <br /> be abused to suppress public observations of the decision-making process, <br /> and does not include situations where the council will be receiving general <br /> legal opinions and advice on the strengths and weaknesses of a proposed <br /> underlying action that may give rise to future litigation. <br /> Minn,Stitt.§13L),pl.subd.3;See Procedure. The following must be done to use this exception: <br /> Ar Fria:Press v.Conray g191744, <br /> Fpr/ll,677 N.w,2d 471(Minn. i. Before closing the meeting,the council must state on <br /> App.2004)(holding that a the record the specific grounds permitting the <br /> statelllent that a meeting wits being <br /> closed under the attorney-client meeting to be closed and describe the subject to be <br /> privilege to discuss"vending discussed, The council should also describe how a <br /> litigation"did not satisfy the <br /> requirement to"describe the balancing of the purposes of the attorney-client <br /> subject to be discussed"at the privilege against the purposes of the open meeting <br /> closed meeting)_ law demonstrates the need for absolute <br /> confidentiality. <br /> ii_ The council must actually communicate with its <br /> attorney at the meeting. <br /> 2. Meetings that must be closed <br /> There are some meetings that the law requires to be closed.The following <br /> meetings must be closed: <br /> Meetings of City Councils 15 <br />