My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017.11.06 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2017 CC Packets
>
2017.11.06 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2017 4:28:56 PM
Creation date
11/2/2017 4:21:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
11/6/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
not shown on the plans, the applicant has indicated that there would be a dock constructed to <br />extend into Oneka Lake for public use. The developer has indicated that an HOA will be <br />established for the development to maintain community areas and landscaping. <br />The sketch plan shows three housing product types: single family homes, maintenance provided <br />villas, and maintenance provided townhomes. The townhomes are shown to the northwest of the <br />site. Staff does have concerns on the buffer between the townhomes and the industrial uses to the <br />west. Although the landscape plan shows a landscape buffer, staff recommends the applicant <br />review the townhome lot layout to provide further separation from the industrial uses. The villa <br />product is shown along Oneka Lake and on the west side of the project. There is not a good <br />transition from the villa product and single family homes. Staff recommends the applicant <br />consider clustering the villa products to a section of the project and provide appropriate <br />transitions between the product types. <br />Planned Unit Development <br />The Lincoln Group will be requesting an approval of a PUD for the Creekside Heights <br />development. PUD's offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of zoning <br />district standards. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for a greater variety of uses, internal <br />transfers of density, construction phasing, and a potential for lower development costs. In <br />exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan <br />will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the <br />case with the use of other, more standard zoning districts. <br />The applicant is proposing to subdivide the 132 -acre site to create 251 residential home sites. <br />The R-3 zoning district requires a minimum lot width of 80 feet. The applicant is proposing a <br />combination of product types and lot widths listed below: <br />Product Type <br />Proposed Lot Width <br />Proposed No. of Lots <br />Single Family Homes <br />65 feet <br />136 <br />Villa Homes <br />55 feet <br />76 <br />Townhomes <br />30 feet <br />44 <br />The applicant is proposing the following setbacks: <br />Single Family and Villa Homes <br />Yard <br />R-3 Zoning District Minimum <br />Proposed Setbacks <br />Front <br />30 feet <br />25 feet <br />Side <br />10 feet <br />7.5 feet (15 feet total between homes) <br />Rear <br />30 feet <br />25 feet <br />It's unclear from the sketch plan and information provided by the applicant how the setbacks <br />would be applied to the townhomes. Further, it is hard to determine the setbacks because the <br />townhomes are usually surrounded by common open space. Staff will continue to work with the <br />applicant on the setbacks for the townhomes. However, staff does recommend at least 30 feet <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.