My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018.06.04 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2018 CC Packets
>
2018.06.04 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2020 3:16:24 PM
Creation date
5/31/2018 2:04:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
6/4/2018
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1.0 INTRODUCTION <br />Oneka Place <br />Hugo, MN <br />45.183* N., 93.010*W. <br />Section 17, T.31 N., R.21 W. <br />Washington County, Minnesota <br />As authorized by CPDC-Pratt-Oakwood LLC, Earth Science Associates, Inc. (ESA) has performed a Wetlands <br />Functional Assessment on a 117.5 acre parcel consisting of agricultural land, woods, and wetlands. The site is <br />located north of the terminus of Oneka Parkway North (See Site Locator Map). On the agricultural portion of <br />the site, the western two-thirds, the developer plans to construct 177 single-family lots (142 single family and 35 <br />villa homes) in four phases. Oneka Parkway North will be extended to join with 165th Street North. The eastern <br />one-third, which contains high quality sedge meadow (Type 2) and shallow marsh (Type 3) wetland plant <br />communities, will be dedicated to the City of Hugo for preservation and a passive trail system, and possible use <br />for on -site wetland mitigation. <br />MNRAM, an acronym for Minnesota Routine Assessment Method for Evaluating Wetland Functions, was <br />originally devised after passage of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) in 1991 in order to fill the <br />need for a practical assessment tool that would help local authorities make sound wetland management <br />decisions as they assumed responsibility for regulating wetland impacts. Wetland Management Classification <br />within MNRAM applies the results of wetland functions and values in order to determine the various <br />management classifications. For each management classification level, management strategies can then be <br />applied to meet the general goals of wetland protection. <br />Our focus is on those wetlands which will be unavoidably impacted by the planned development. A wetlands <br />functional assessment has also been completed for the on -site replacement wetland in order to provide <br />assurance that the functions and values of the replacement wetland will exceed the functions and values of <br />those wetlands unavoidably impacted. <br />2.0 METHODS <br />Following completion of a wetland delineation and report of the subject property, the results were entered into <br />MNRAM version 3.4, the current edition of the program. The program asks 72 questions based on the physical <br />setting and field observations relating to the subject wetland. For each wetland evaluated, the program creates <br />Wetland Functional Assessment Summary for 12 wetland functions/value characteristics, a Wetland Community <br />Summary, and a Management Classification Report for each wetland evaluated. <br />The current grading plan (See #4 Current Preliminary Grading Plan 3-19-18) will unavoidably fill or drain portions <br />of seven (7) wetland areas. That is, wetland B, BB, D-E, F, I, L, and K (See Wetland Delineation Site <br />Diagram). A description of each wetland has been summarized in the wetland delineation report previously <br />prepared for this site. Information from the delineation report is entered into the MNRAM program. Two <br />summary reports are then generated by the program, 1) A Wetland Functional Assessment & Community <br />Summary, and 2) a Management Classification Report. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.