My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PC Packet 06.28.18
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2018 PC Packets
>
PC Packet 06.28.18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2018 10:57:52 AM
Creation date
12/6/2018 2:28:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
6/28/2018
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 <br />2. BACKGROUND: <br />In February 2018, TGK Automotive presented a sketch plan to the Economic Development <br />Authority (EDA), Planning Commission, and City Council for the auto repair business. They <br />asked for comments on the site layout, architecture, and rezoning of the property. <br />The Commissions and City Council were generally comfortable with the rezoning of the property <br />to General Business (C-2), but stated the transition and buffer to the residential properties to the <br />east is important and that the following items should be incorporated into the site plan: <br />• The number of cars parked/stored outdoors should be limited and screened from the <br />residential properties to the east and Highway 61. <br />• The architecture is important as it's on Highway 61. The building should be built out of <br />quality materials. <br />• Any roof top or ground mechanical equipment should be screened from view. The roof <br />top mechanical equipment should be screened with the extension of the parapet walls of <br />the building. <br />• The lighting should be directed away from the residential properties to the east. <br />• The transitions between the land uses should include ideas on how to abate noise. For <br />example, the overhead doors should remain closed as work is being completed on the <br />vehicles. <br />They agreed that the rezoning seemed reasonable, however the site plan will be essential in <br />making that decision. <br />At that time staff was comfortable with the request, as long as there are proper transitions <br />between the land uses and the impact on the surrounding residential properties is minimized. <br />Staff stated that if the rezoning of the property is supported, then it may be reasonable to expect <br />other property owners to the north and south of this site to request the same zoning. Staff was <br />also comfortable with these properties also being rezoned to C-2 as well. <br />3. LEVEL OF DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING <br />The City has discretion in approving or denying rezoning applications, based on whether or not <br />the proposal meets the standards outlined in the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance <br />requirements. If the City finds that all the applicable standards are met, the rezoning application <br />must be approved. However, if the City finds that any of the applicable standards are not met, <br />the application may be denied. <br />The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the <br />proposed project complies with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements. If <br />it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.