My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
EDA Packet 12.19.17
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
EDA
>
EDA Agenda/Packets
>
2017 EDA Packets
>
EDA Packet 12.19.17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2018 4:23:08 PM
Creation date
12/7/2018 3:03:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
12/19/2017
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
EDA
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
308
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Transitions <br />Developing and sustaining a well-balanced community --one that includes a variety of land uses that are conveniently located to one another --- <br />often requires that different types of land uses are located in proximity to one another. It also frequently requires the use of transitions from one <br />land use to another. However, a mixing of land uses and the accompanying transitions help create a more exciting and stimulating environment <br />than one dominated by a single land use. <br />The compatibility of one land use with another depends on what the uses are and the quality of site design. Compatibility may be judged broadly <br />based on general land use or narrowly on the design features of a specific project. What uses are compatible is often a matter of the particular <br />circumstances of a proposed development and its location. Therefore, there are no hard and fast rules that apply in every case. <br />Good transitions can be promoted both by land use planning and by development regulations and site planning techniques. Opportunities for <br />good transitions can be enhanced or lost when the overall land use pattern is set. For example, a Land Use Plan should anticipate the need for <br />transitions by using natural or manmade features, such as a wetland or a major roadway, as separation between potentially incompatible uses. <br />If incompatible uses are placed next to each other without physical separation, it is possible that no amount of site planning can mitigate the <br />potential problem. <br />Traditionally, it is the responsibility of the more intense land use to provide an appropriate transition to an adjacent less intense land use. <br />However, sometimes making an appropriate transition is the responsibility of the last property owner to develop. Consequently, it is important to <br />consider existing and future land use when planning for transitions. <br />DRAFT Dec14-17 <br />for review only <br />HUGO 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE LAND USE 71 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.