My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019.09.16 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2019 CC Packets
>
2019.09.16 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2020 1:33:41 PM
Creation date
9/12/2019 3:49:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
9/16/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Gopher State Storage Site Plan and Variance <br />Page 5 <br />Setbacks <br />The proposed development complies with the 30-foot front yard (south side) and side yard (east <br />and north) setbacks. The ordinance requires a side yard setback equal to the height of the <br />building, in no case less than 10 feet. The building height is proposed to be approximately 48 <br />feet at the highest point. <br />39 feet of right-of-way adjacent to TH 61 was dedicated to the City with the previous site plan <br />approval. The right-of-way easement was required as part of the TH 61 corridor plan, which <br />requires a 150 foot wide corridor for future expansion of the road. Since the right-of-way <br />easement was dedicated, setback of the building is measured from the easement line, not the <br />property line. <br />The applicant is requesting approval of a variance from the front yard setback requirements to <br />construct the building 0 feet from the right-of-way easement on the west side of the property, <br />where 30 feet is required by ordinance. The building will be 39 feet from the west property line, <br />consistent with the other existing buildings on the property. <br />VARIANCE STANDARDS: <br />The Board must review the requested variances with the standards outlined in Section 90-38 of <br />the land use regulations. Staff used these standards to review the variance request and finds the <br />following: <br />(1) Law. The variance as requested is permissible by law. <br />The proposed variance is permissible by law. <br />(2) Practical Difficulties. The applicant for a variance shall establish that there are practical <br />difficulties in complying with the provisions of the zoning regulations. The term "Practical <br />Difficulties" as used in the granting of a variance means: <br />a. Reasonable Use. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable <br />manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance and; <br />The property does have constraints due to regards to an existing drainage ditch, <br />floodplain, high ground water, wetlands, right-of-way dedication, and a sanitary sewer <br />pipe going through the property. This does limit the buildable area of the property. A <br />three story building with a maximum height is allowed on in the zoning district as well as <br />the proposed use. Requesting a building to be placed the proposed location is a <br />reasonable use of the property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.