My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PC Packet 09.12.19
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2019 PC Packets
>
PC Packet 09.12.19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2019 11:25:48 AM
Creation date
12/19/2019 11:23:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
9/12/2019
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Gopher State Storage Site Plan and Variance <br />Page 4 <br />building materials proposed include precast concrete panels of various brown colors with various <br />textures and red architectural metal. <br />The existing buildings on site are constructed with integrally colored rock face block that are a <br />buff and reddish color. The existing buildings have a pitched roof design. The gabled ends have <br />reddish siding and the roofs are copper color. <br />Since the applicant has changed the site plan and building design, it is a goal to ensure the <br />proposed building is cohesive with the existing buildings and character of the area. <br />The Planning Commission recommended that the applicant work with staff on revisions to the <br />plans to ensure the proposed building is cohesive with the existing buildings on the property. The <br />applicant has been working with staff over the last couple weeks on the items outlined in the <br />staff report and as recommended by the Planning Commission. The applicant has revised the <br />plan to include the following: <br />• The project will be completed in one phase. <br />• The tip -up concrete panel colors have been revised to match the rock -faced block colors <br />on the existing buildings. <br />• The architectural metal color has been revised to match the garage doors on the existing <br />buildings. Architectural metal will also be added to the existing building to be more <br />cohesive with the proposed building. <br />• The applicant has revised the architecture along the west side of the building to break up <br />the massing of the building. <br />• The applicant has added base details to the main entrance of the building. <br />• The exact colors and textures of the building materials shall be reviewed and approved by <br />staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. <br />The applicant has made changes to the architecture and building materials and has done a good <br />job working on making the project cohesive. The applicant is proposing to build the project in <br />one phase to complete the architecture of the building. It is in staff's opinion that there has been <br />progress made on the architecture and an effort to design the building with quality materials and <br />attractive details that are cohesive with the existing building on site in regards to building <br />materials and colors. <br />Setbacks <br />The proposed development complies with the 30 -foot front (south side) and side yard setbacks. <br />The ordinance requires a side yard setback equal to the height of the building, in no case less <br />than 10 feet. The building height is proposed to be approximately 48 feet at the highest point. <br />39 feet of right-of-way adjacent to TH 61 was dedicated to the City with the previous site plan <br />approval. The right-of-way easement was required as part of the TH 61 corridor plan, which <br />requires a 150 foot wide corridor for future expansion of the road. Since the right-of-way <br />easement was dedicated, setback of the building is measured from the easement line, not the <br />property line. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.