Laserfiche WebLink
Goodview Avenue had improvements in the 1970's, 80's, and early 90's. Since then, pavement <br />conditions have aged and are exhibiting distresses such as transverse and longitudinal cracking, <br />pavement rutting, and a fallen cross slope, with surfaces rated as fair to poor. <br />3.2 Drainage <br />Runoff is currently collected by the existing drainage ditches. Culverts are located across sections of the <br />roadways as well as across many of the driveways to convey runoff into adjacent wetland areas. <br />3.3 Private Utilities <br />Private utilities that have facilities in or near the project area will be notified during the final design phase <br />of the project and will be requested to coordinate any necessary repairs and replacements as needed at <br />their cost. Private utility companies that have facilities within the project area include the following: <br />■ Comcast (Cable) <br />■ CenturyLink (Telecom) <br />■ Koch Pipelines (Oil) <br />■ Xcel Energy (Electric/Gas) <br />■ Zayo Bandwidth (Telecom) <br />3.4 Sanitary Sewer <br />The properties within the project area are served by private sanitary systems. <br />3.5 Watermain <br />The properties within the project area are served by private water systems. <br />4. PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTS <br />4.1 Surface <br />4.1.1 Roadway <br />Two roadway design options were considered for this report. Both options proposed for the project area <br />include the reclamation of the existing asphalt pavement and aggregate base with only minor subgrade <br />corrections as needed with the roadway remaining a rural section. <br />The base roadway option considered for Goodview Avenue, Option 1, is to match the existing 24-foot <br />width. With this option, the roadway would be reclaimed and paved at the same width as the existing <br />roadway, with only minor improvements to the existing shoulder to meet State Aid Standards. The layout <br />of the roadway would include two 11-foot driving lanes and two 1-foot-wide paved shoulders, with a rural <br />typical section. This option minimizes both cost and construction impact to the adjacent properties; <br />however, it does not provide any extra shoulder space for bikers or pedestrians. <br />The second roadway option considered, Option 2, is to widen the existing rural section from a 24-foot <br />width to a 26-foot width. The layout of the roadway would include two 11-foot driving lanes and two 2- <br />foot-wide paved shoulders with a rural typical section. This option provides a somewhat wider and safer <br />route for pedestrians or bicyclists; however, the option would be more expensive than replacing in kind <br />Feasibility Report <br />2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project <br />City of Hugo, MN <br />WSB Project No. R-014873-000 <br />Page 3 <br />