Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Packet 04.23.20CI I Y OF�- Agenda Hugo Planning Commission Thursday, April 23, 2020 REMOTE MEETING 7:00 PM Meeting to be held remotely pursuant Minn. Stat. Sec. 13D.021 Anyone who wishes to speak at the meeting is strongly encouraged to make arrangements by 4:30 p.m. on the meeting day by contacting Community Development Assistant, Emily Weber at 651-762-6311 or eweber@ci.hugo.mn.us. For more information on the remote meeting and participation, go to: www.ci.hugo.mn.us/planning Meeting ID: 931-6280-4740 A. ROLL CALL: Arcand, Derr, Fry, Kleissler, Lessard, Luchsinger, Mulvihill, Tjernlund B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. April 9, 2020 D. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Tony Harmening - PUD, Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan Application for a Restaurant. E. NEW BUSINESS F. OLD BUSINESS G. ADJOURNMENT If you need accommodations for the Planning Commission meeting please contact Rachel Juba at (651) 762-6304 or rjuba@ci.hugo.mn.us, thank you. Minutes for the Planning Commission Meetine of Thursday. April 9. 2020 Meeting held remotely pursuant Minn. Stat. Sec. 13D.021 Chair Kleissler called the meeting to order at 7:07 pm. PRESENT: Arcand, Derr, Fry, Kleissler, Lessard, Mulvihill, Tjernlund (joined at 7:20 pm). ABSENT: Luchsinger. STAFF: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant Pledge of Allegiance. Approval of Minutes for the Planning Commission Meeting of February 27, 2020 Commissioner Arcand made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Derr to approve minutes for the meeting of February 27, 2020. Ayes: Arcand, Derr, Fry, Kleissler, Lessard, Mulvihill. Nay: None. Motion carried. Tonv Harmening — PUD and site plan application for a restaurant. The applicant tabled the application until the April 23, 2020 Planning Commission meeting. There was no discussion on this agenda item. Charles and Marykay Haas — Zoning amendment to rezone from Long Term Agricultural to Agricultural at the property located at 15500 Keystone Avenue. Staff provided background on the zoning amendment request. Charles Haas was present to provide further details on his request. Staff recommended that that the Planning Commission open the public hearing and take all public comment. Staff also recommended approval of the zoning amendment request. Chair Kleissler opened the public hearing at 7:19 pm. No one provided comments. Chair Kleissler closed the public hearing at 7:22 pm. There was no discussion from the Planning Commission on the application. April 9, 2020 PC Minutes Page 2 Commissioner Derr made a motion to approve the request to rezone the property located at 15500 keystone Avenue North from Long Term Agricultural Zoning District to the Agricultural Zoning District. Seconded by Commissioner Fry. Ayes: Arcand, Derr, Fry, Kleissler, Lessard, Mulvihill, Tjernlund. Nay: None. Motion carried. Chair Kleissler called a recess at 7:24 pm. The meeting was called back to order at 7:31 pm. Sullivan Day Construction — TGK Auto Site Plan Phase II Staff provided background on the site plan application submitted by Sullivan Day Construction on behalf of TGK Automotive. The applicant is requesting site plan approval for an approximately 2,900 square foot addition on the existing building located at 13891 Forest Boulevard North. Staff stated that the original site plan was designed to accommodate the addition and recommended approval subject to the conditions listed in the resolution. Troy Kaplan from TGK Automotive and Alisha Simones from Koma Inc. were present to further discuss the project and parking on site. Commissioner Derr stated that he was happy to see the parking on site addressed and Chair Kleissler commented that the expansion will be a good addition to the business. Commissioner Tjernlund, seconded by Commissioner Arcand, made a motion to approve the site plan for an approximately 2,900 square foot addition on the existing building located at 13891 Forest Boulevard North, subject to the conditions listed in the approval. Ayes: Arcand, Derr, Fry, Kleissler, Lessard, Mulvihill, Tjernlund. Nay: None. Motion carried. Adjournment Commissioner Fry made a motion, Commissioner Tjernlund seconded, to adjourn at 8:44 pm. Ayes: Arcand, Derr, Fry, Kleissler, Lessard, Mulvihill, Tjernlund. Nay: None. Motion carried. Respectfully Submitted, Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant Agenda Number DA CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Hugo Planning Commission FROM: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Tony Harmening — Planned Unit Development (PUD), Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan Applications for the Cattle House Restaurant DATE: April 15, 2020, for the Planning Commission Meeting of April 23, 2020 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Mixed -Use (MIX) ZONING: Central Business (C-1) REVIEW DEADLINE (120-days): June 30, 2020 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a planned unit development (PUD), preliminary plat, and site plan to construct an approximately 5,700 square foot restaurant building for Cattle House Restaurant. The PUD general plan will be for all 4.2 acres of the property and is proposed to be rezoned from Central Business (C-1) to Planned Unit Development (PUD). The property is located on the east side of Highway 61 in downtown along Egg Lake. The property includes wetlands and floodplain along Egg Lake for a total buildable acreage of 4 acres. The property is currently owned by the City of Hugo and the applicant has a purchase agreement to purchase a portion of the property totaling approximately 2 acres and is Phase 1 of the proposed development. The PUD general plan includes the restaurant for Phase 1 and for Phase 2 a 4,000 square foot event center and three retail/office buildings totaling 10,100 square feet. Phase 1 will only be approved. Phase 2 will need to go through another land use application review process at the time of development. The preliminary plat will include one commercial lot and one outlot to be known as "Shores of Egg lake". The site plan approval is for 2 acres on the north side of the property and includes the Cattle House restaurant, outdoor gathering spaces/amenities along the lake, and a parking lot. The site plan shows an expansion for an event center, but that is not being approved at this time. The applicant will need to apply for site plan approval for the expansion. Page 2 The applicant is requesting PUD flexibility on the following: Flexibility to allow a minimum shoreland setback of 49 feet, where 125 feet is required by ordinance. Flexibility to allow reduced parking space requirements for shared parking throughout the PUD. The flexibility will allow 174 parking spaces, where 192 are required by ordinance. Flexibility to allow parking side yard setback to be 4.3 feet, where 5 feet is required by ordinance. In exchange for this flexibility, the developer is: • Exceeding the landscape ordinance requirements. • Preservation of existing large trees on the property. • Public trails along Egg Lake with trails easements to extend the trail to the north and south. 2. LEVEL OF DISCRETION IN DECISION -MAKING The City has discretion in approving or denying rezoning applications, based on whether or not the proposal meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If the City finds that all the applicable standards are met, the rezoning application must be approved. However, if the City finds that any of the applicable standards are not met, the application may be denied. The City has relatively high level of discretion in approving a PUD. A PUD must be consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. The City may impose reasonable requirements in a PUD not otherwise required if the City deems it necessary to promote the general health, safety, and welfare of the community. The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the subdivision regulations in the City Code. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. 3. CONTEXT: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning The properties to the north is zoned Central Business (C-1) and Central Residential (CR-3) and is and are occupied with single family homes. The property to the east is occupied by Egg Lake. The property to the south is zoned Central Business (C-1) and is occupied by the Dominos Pizza Building. The property to the west across Highway 61 is zoned Central Business (C-1) and is E Page 3 occupied by the Hugo Feed Mill, single family home, and City Hall. All of the properties surrounding the property are classified as Mixed -Use (MIX) on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and are in the downtown plan. B. Natural Characteristics of Site The site is vacant and generally flat. There are existing mature trees on the property. The site is adjacent to Egg Lake and there are wetlands between the property and Egg Lake. 4. ANALYSIS: A. Planned Unit Development (PUD) The use of the PUD zoning allows the developer zoning ordinance flexibility to create a master planned development. The PUD zoning is tied to a specific PUD general plan that is proposed with this application. The applicant is requesting approval of a PUD for the development. PUD's offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of zoning district standards. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for a greater variety of uses, internal transfers of density, construction phasing and a potential for lower development costs. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the city has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the use of other, more standard zoning districts. In exchange for the proposed PUD, the applicant is proposing: • Exceeding the landscape ordinance requirements. • Preservation of existing large trees on the property. • Public trails along Egg Lake with trails easements to extend the trail to the north and south. Staff believes that the layout of the proposed PUD general plan exceeds the City's standards for commercial developments. The applicant has offered a more creative and efficient approach to the existing landscape and constraints of the property through the site design layout. The plan also meets the downtown plan and design guidelines. In order to approve a PUD, the City must find that the applicant has demonstrated compliance with the following criteria: 1. Provide for the establishment of PUD zoning districts in appropriate setting and situations, to create and maintain a development pattern that complies with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2. Allow for the mixing of land uses within a development when such mixing of land uses could not otherwise be accomplished. 3 3. Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporating design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. 4. Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability and general welfare of the City. 5. Preserve and enhance natural features and open spaces including but not limited to the width expansion of greenway corridors, conservation of wooded areas, development of buffer areas, reduction of impervious surface, and utilization of joint facilities and utilities. 6. Maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities. 7. Ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan shows the land use being Mixed -Use (MIX). The rezoning/PUD is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in terms of land use. It is in staff s opinion that the PUD general plan has offered a creative and efficient method to planning the site, all which meets the intent of the PUD ordinance. Lot Sizes The applicant is proposing to subdivide the existing 4.2 acre property to create commercial lots. The restaurant will be 2 acres and will be Phase 1. Phase 2 includes three retail buildings on the remaining 2.2 acres. At the time of approval for Phase 2, the lots could be subdivide into separate lots for each building. The lot size meets the minimum lot size of 8,000 square feet for the Central Business (C-1) zoning district. Setbacks Buildings in the Central Business (C-1) district are required to meet the minimum setback standards of 10 feet from the front property line, 30 feet from the rear property line, and zero feet from the side property lines. The building meets all of the building setback requirements. Although the building meets the City's building setback requirements, since the property abuts Egg Lake it is also in the Shoreland Overlay District and shall meet the shoreland setback requirements. E Page 5 The applicant is requesting flexibility for the shoreland setbacks for the development. The applicant is proposing the following setbacks: Shoreland Setbacks I Required Proposed Setback from the OHW 1 125 Feet 49 Feet (for the deck) Staff is comfortable with this request for flexibility from the shoreland setback requirements. The property is unique because it is a long and narrow piece between Egg Lake and HWY 61. It is limited on what they can do with the property. The property was previously occupied with buildings and parking lots that did not meet the shoreland setback requirement. There are expansion plans along Highway 61 that the applicant has taken into account. They will be required to dedicate additional right-of-way with the development along the front property line, which makes the property even smaller. The location of the north access into the site for circulation, has the effect of pushing the building back on the site closer to the lake. The downtown plan also shows a restaurant building along the lake to take advantage of the views across the lake. Building Setbacks Related to the Downtown Design Guidelines The downtown design guidelines state that buildings in this area should be oriented to the street with fully articulated street facades (doors and windows) based on traditional downtown storefronts. The downtown plan shows the buildings abutting Highway 61 and parking lots in back by Egg Lake. It also shows a restaurant pushed back towards Egg Lake and limited commercial buildings along Highway 61. Staff is comfortable with the location of the building being towards Egg Lake since that is the way that it is shown on the downtown plan. The restaurant then can take advantage of the views of the lake on the east side of the building that includes most of the dining area and a deck. The layout of the property is different than what is shown on the downtown plan. The downtown plan is simply a guide to show how the area could be development and it is not a plan to dictate the exact placement of buildings or parking lots. The area proposed to be developed shows a park area. Several years ago the Parks Commission discussed this and stated that as long as there are active areas along the lake a park is not needed. They stated that Lions Park serves this area and would rather see a trail along the lake as shown the Comprehensive Plan. Building Coverage and Lot Coverage The ordinance limits lot area to be covered by a building to 60% and lot area to be covered by impervious surface to 90%. The proposed site plan complies with the coverage requirements. The applicant also meets the shoreland impervious surface requirements for the development. The applicant is proposing the following: Shoreland I Required Proposed Maximum Im ervious 25% 25% 5 0 OM Density The maximum development density for a PUD in the Central Business (C-1) zoning district is 60 units per 1 acre. The applicant is not proposing any residential units at this time. Development Phasing The PUD General Ran proposes two phases at this time. Phase 1 wi I I be the restaurant with the proposed access off of H i ghway 61. Phase 2 i ncl udes the three retai I /offi ce bui I di ngs as wel I as access across from 140h Street on Highway 61. Phase 2 wi I I al so include event center expansion on the restaurant bui I di ng. Phase 2 wi I I need to go through another I and use appl i cati on revi ew and approval by the R anni ng Commi ssi on and Ci ty Counci 1. Parking The Comprehensive Land Use Regulations state that a restaurant user shall have 1 parking space per 3 seats for restaurants and events centers, based on capacity. There shall be 1 parking space per 250 square feet of building for retail buildings. Parking Calculations Required Proposed Overall Phase 1 Phase 2* 5,000 Sq. Ft. Restaurant 212 capacity 71 Parking Spaces 76 Parking Spaces 67 Parking Spaces 3,870 Sq. Ft. Event Center 241 capacity 81 Parking Spaces N/A 67 Parking Spaces 10,100 Sq. Ft. of Retail Total for Three Buildings 40 Parking Spaces N/A 40 Parking Spaces TOTAL 192 Parking Spaces 76 Parking Spaces 174 Parking Spaces *With construction of Phase 2 shared parking throughout the site is proposed. Staff has been working with the applicant on the number of parking stalls that would be adequate for the restaurant use. Staff is comfortable with the proposal since parking will be used for the overall downtown project and will be shared between users in the downtown. This is consistent with the downtown design guidelines which encourages businesses to establish or participate in providing shared parking with reductions in required on -site parking. The applicant has not provided calculations that would allow additional food service/restaurants in the proposed PUD in the retail buildings. If there are food service/restaurant uses proposed at a later date, the parking space requirements shall be further evaluated. Streets and Access The applicant has identified a concept for the entire property, however they are proposing only to build on the northerly portion of the site identified as Phase 1. The applicant will need to obtain FZ Page 7 an access permit from MNDOT and a permit to work within the right of way on Highway 61. The access from Highway 61 for the first phase is proposed to be a full access with turn lanes. There is already a full access designed for the site across from 146th Street that has been permitted by MnDOT. In addition, the applicant is proposing shared parking for the entire PUD. Staff is generally comfortable with shared parking based on the proposed uses. The applicant will be required to record a shared parking and maintenance agreement benefiting of the properties to the north and south. MnDOT provided a comment letter on February 26, 2020. Comments within this review letter will need to be addressed. Most of these comments are routine in nature, however the comments related to traffic safety will require additional study. Since the northern access will require geometric changes to TH 61, it will need to be reviewed through the Level 2 Layout review process. This process will identify if the northerly access can be constructed as proposed and if it can remain as a full access once the southerly entrance is constructed. Alternatively, if this access is not approved by MnDOT, the applicant can access the restaurant site via a driveway connection from the existing full access across from 146th Street. The property owner to the north along Highway 61 has their driveway on the City owned property. The applicant is working with the property owner on access to their property. C. Site Plan — Cattle House Restaurant Building Height In the Central Business (C-1) zoning district the maximum building height is 35 feet. The building at its highest dimension is proposed to be 22 feet and will meet the building height regulation. Landscaping Based on the type and size of the proposed restaurant building and the dimensions of the site, the landscaping plan should include a minimum of 13 deciduous shade trees, 7 coniferous trees, 7 ornamental, and 44 shrubs. The applicant's landscape plan not only meets all of the City's landscape requirements for a commercial use but exceeds the requirements. the applicant is also preserving existing trees on the site. The landscaping surrounds the building with perennials and has trees and shrubs located within the parking lot in the islands. There is a row of shrubs that are lined along Highway 61 that provides a nice buffer between the sidewalk and parking lot. There is also an evenly spaced row of trees proposed for the area along Highway 61. The remaining greenspace on the property will be sod. The downtown design guidelines state where parking is located along the street, it should be landscaped and screened with a combination of fencing or wall plantings along the street edge. The applicant has done a good job of creating a wall edge of shrubs and trees along the road, it also created a landscaped edge between the sidewalk and the parking lot. The applicant is also proposing decorative lighting along Highway 61. The applicant did not propose any landscaping 7 Z OM along the south property line surrounding the parking lot since the parking lot is planned to be extended to the north for future development. Sidewalks and Trials The downtown design guidelines promote a pedestrian friendly downtown area. The site plan does create a pedestrian friendly atmosphere by connecting the sidewalk along Highway 61 to a proposed boardwalk and trail system along the lake. The applicant has agreed to grant the City a trail easement along the lake which will be constructed in the future as development occurs. The trail easement will be condition of site plan approval. There are wetlands between the building and the lake and a boardwalk may need to be constructed for a portion of the trail to avoid impact to the wetlands. The boardwalks and dock will need to be reviewed and approved by the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) and the MnDNR. The applicant is requesting PUD flexibility for the dock construction regulations for the shoreland overlay district, however, until the dock is reviewed and approved by the MnDNR staff is unsure what the dimensions will be approved. The applicant will be required to obtain a permit of MNDNR prior to installation. Lighting The applicant has submitted a full lighting plan that includes decorative lighting for the site and the building. The lights are The photometric plan provided does not meet the ordinance standard. The lighting plans shall be revised and submitted to the City for review and approval by staff. Architecture and Building Materials The downtown design guidelines encourage new buildings to be designed with elements of traditional main street design, Hugo's French trading post roots, or prairie style architecture. Traditional main street style buildings usually have flat roofs with well defined roof lines. The French trading post architectural elements include steeper or mansard roofs, open storefronts, and exterior plaster with stone and brick. Prairie style architecture usually has hipped roofs with low spreading deep overhangs. Prairie style architecture also has horizontal line design elements and uses materials that can blend in with the natural environment. The applicant has designed the building to be reflective of the prairie style architecture. The building is designed with a large sloped roof that opens up to the lake with horizontal cornice, accent elements, and windows reflective of prairie style architecture. The large overhead glass doors open up the deck and the upper windows horizontal details are elements of prairie style. The timbers and the "barnwood" like facade are elements that relate to the natural environment. There is also stacked stone that is used on the building and there is significant amount of glass on the eastside of the building overlooking the lake. The downtown design guidelines encourage four-sided architecture, using the same quality materials on all sides. It also states that all facades shall be articulated with a variety of materials, F details, and visual interest. Roof lines and cornices shall be completed in the three dimensional manner and the front facade shall be unique and significant to the building. Its in staff s opinion that the applicant has done a good job of accomplishing these items encouraged by the downtown design guidelines by having the materials, design elements, and windows wrap around the building. They have also made the main entrance visible of the building that will lead the customer where to go when entering the building. The applicant has provided the building materials that will be used for the restaurant. Staff has reviewed the materials and it is in staffs opinion that the materials could be more cohesive in regards to material and colors. Staff has not received materials for the proposed metal panels or timber cladding. Staff recommends the applicant continue to work with staff to ensure the materials and colors are cohesive for the restaurant building. Staff will show the building materials at the meeting. The applicant is proposing a deck on the east side of the building. They have not submitted design plans for the deck to date. Staff will continue to work with the applicant to ensure the design is consistent with the overall architectural theme of the project. The proposed deck does not show railings. If the applicant adds railings to the deck they shall be reviewed and approved by staff. The applicant has provided an example of how the other buildings for the overall PUD could be designed to relate to the restaurant building. Phase 2 and the other buildings shall go through a PUD amendment and site plan process for review and approval. Screening The applicant is proposing the trash enclosure to be constructed to the west side of the building and it will be constructed of the same materials as the building. The trash enclosures will fully screen the dumpsters for the restaurant and the gates will be constructed of cedar. The trash enclosure is also screened by a variety of landscaping. Staff has some concerns about the location of the trash enclosure. The trash enclosure is located west of the building, specifically where the event center is proposed. Staff has requested that the applicant review this location and consider another location for the trash enclosure. The applicant has provided a roof top mechanical unit plan that shows how the equipment will be screened from view from the property lines. Most of the parapet wall is extended 4 feet above the roof line. Staff feels the parapet wall is of sufficient height to screen the roof top mechanical equipment from public view. Signage The applicant is proposing one wall sign for the building. They are also proposing a monument sign at the entrance of the site. Staff recommends the applicant continue to work with staff on the sign design and location. All signage is required to have a permit and approval by the City prior E Page 10 to construction and installation of the signs. Staff also recommends that development sign criteria will established for the overall PUD. Ponding and Stormwater Management The applicant is proposing a combination of pervious pavement and infiltration basins to meet the stormwater management requirements. The stormwater management plan for the site is generally constant with the City / Rice Creek Watershed District rules. Staff has been working directly with the applicant's engineer to revise the documentation related to the infiltration and stormwater pond for the site. Staff expects that the required changes can be made with minimal changes to the site plan. Stormwater reuse is not proposed to be incorporated into this project. Stormwater management features proposed can't support the water demand to irrigate the site. The applicant has been evaluating whether they can use Egg Lake for stormwater reuse. The applicant stated this continues to be evaluated. If it is feasible, it shall be constructed. Utilities An existing 15" sanitary sewer main extends through the property and will serve the proposed development. An existing 8" watermain along TH 61 and an 8" watermain within Fondant Avenue North will provide the site with water service. Staff has recommended looping the watermain from the dead-end water main on Fondant Avenue North to the watermain along TH 61. This looping will improve water quality and system reliability. Staff is working with the adjacent landowner to acquire an easement to accommodate this connection. The property owner has indicated they are willing to provide this easement. B. Preliminary Plat The preliminary plat includes one lot and one outlot. The lot is for the restaurant site plan. The applicant will be required to apply for a final plat to create the lot for the restaurant. Park dedication is not required for commercial developments. 6. CONCLUSION/STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It's in staffs opinion that the redevelopment project for Cattle House Restaurant is consistent with the downtown plan and design guidelines. The requests meet the criteria for approval and are also consistent with the downtown plan and design guidelines. Staff recommended the Planning Commission approve the PUD, preliminary plat, and site plan applications, subject to the conditions listed in the resolutions. 10 Page 11 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Ordinance 3. Resolutions (3) 4. Engineers Memo dated April 1, 2020 5. MnDOT Comments letter dated February 26, 2020 6. Downtown Plan & Design Guidelines 7. Applicants Narratives 8. Proposed Lighting 9. Proposed Building Materials 10. Site Plan/PUD Documents and Restaurant Building Elevations 11 z -74 LL Lower 147Th Street North A. J A69 145th Street North ORDINANCE 2020- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO AMENDING CHAPTER 90 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY CODE TO CLASSIFY CERTAIN LAND LOCATED SOUTH OF 147TH STREET AND EAST OF HIGHWAY 61 (FOREST BOULEVARD NORTH) THE CITY OF HUGO ORDAINS: Section 1. Amendment of the City Code. Chapter 90 of the City Code of the City of Hugo, Minnesota, is hereby amended by changing the classification on the City of Hugo Zoning Map to PUD (Planned Unit Development) with respect to the 4.2-acre property legally described as follows: See Attached Section 2. Effective Date. This amendment shall take effect upon its passage. ADOPTED by the City Council this 0 day of May, 2020. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk RESOLUTION 2020- APPROVING PUD GENERAL PLAN FOR ANTHONY HARMENING, FOR "SHORE OF EGG LAKE" ON PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF 147TH STREET NORTH AND EAST OF HIGHWAY 61 (FOREST BOULEVARD NORTH) WHEREAS, Anthony Harmening, has requested approval of a PUD general plan to allow the development of a an approximately 5,700 square foot restaurant with an approximately 4,000 square foot event center and three retail buildings totaling approximately 10,100 square feet on a 4.2 acre property legally described as follows: (See Attached) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the PUD general plan at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Anthony Harmening, subject to the following conditions: 1. A PUD general plan is approved to allow the development of a restaurant with event center and three retail buildings. The development shall be constructed in accordance with the application and plans received by the City on January 17, 2020, and April 10, 2020, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the requested rezoning of the 4.2 acre property and preliminary plat. 3. The PUD general plan is approved based on the finding that the proposed project is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 4. The developer shall comply with all conditions in the resolution for the site plan and preliminary plat (Resolution #2020- and Resolution #2020-__) 5. The developer shall comply with all conditions in the City Engineer's letter dated April 1, 2020. 6. The developer shall comply with all items in the MnDOT letter dated February 26, 2020. All access points require a permit to be issued from MnDOT. 7. The dock and boardwalk shall be reviewed and approved by the MnDNR and the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) Resolution 2020- Page 2 8. PUD flexibility is granted to allow: a. Flexibility to allow a minimum shoreland setback of 49 feet, where 125 feet is required. b. Flexibility for reduced parking space requirements for shared parking throughout the PUD to allow 174 parking spaces, where 192 parking spaces are required by ordinance. c. Flexibility to allow parking side yard setback to be 4.3 feet where 5 feet is required by ordinance. 9. The preliminary phasing plan is generally approved per plans dated April 10, 2020. Any major revisions to the phasing plan shall require PUD amendment. Minor modifications shall be reviewed and approved by staff. a. Phase 1 shall include: i. An approximately 5,700 square foot restaurant building. ii. All improvements shown in the phase 1 plan, including trails and boardwalks. b. Phase 2 shall include: i. Three retail buildings totaling approximately 10,000 square feet. ii. A 4,000 square foot event center. iii. All improvements shown in the phase 2 plan, including trails and boardwalks. 10. Phase 2 shall be required to apply for site plan, and other applicable applications, to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and City Council. 11. The developer has not provided calculations that would allow additional food service/restaurants in the proposed PUD in the retail buildings. If there are food service/restaurant uses proposed at a later date, the parking space requirements shall be further evaluated for review and approval by the City. 12. The building setbacks and impervious surface coverage requirements for the PUD are as follows: Front Setback 10 feet (min) Side Setback 0 feet (min) 4.3 feet for parking lot Rear Setback 30 feet (min) Lot Impervious 50% (max) 25% in shoreland overlay Resolution 2020- Page 3 13. A stormwater re -use system shall be further evaluated. If it is feasible, it shall constructed. 14. As the future phases are constructed the developer shall have a commercial association created to maintain the common areas, including parking, lighting, landscaping, and boardwalks. ADOPTED by the City Council this 4th day of May, 2020. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk RESOLUTION 2018-15 APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT REQUESTED BY ANTHONY HARMENING FOR "SHORES Of EGG LAKE" ON PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF 147TH STREET NORTH AND EAST OF HIGHWAY 61 (FOREST BOULEVARD NORTH) WHEREAS, Anthony Harmening, has requested approval of a preliminary plat to allow construction of 1 commercial lot and 1 outlot the 4.2 acre property legally described as follows: (See Attached) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the preliminary plat at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Anthony Harmening, for a preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. A preliminary plat is approved to allow the creation of 1 commercial lot and 1 outot, in accordance with the application and plans received by the City on January 17, 2020, and April 10, 2020, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of a rezoning to PUD for the 4.2 acre site. 3. The developer shall comply with Resolution 2020-, for the PUD. 4. The building setbacks and impervious surface requirements for the development are as follows: Front Setback 10 feet (min) Side Setback 0 feet (min) 4.3 feet for parking lot Rear Setback 30 feet (min) Lot Impervious 50% (max) 25% in shoreland overlay 5. The landscaping planned for the development shall be installed all at the same time during each phase. The developers shall take proper precautions to protect the trees as the homes are being built. Resolution 2020- Page 2 6. Prior to the release of the final plat for recording, the developer shall comply with the following conditions. a. The development shall comply with the Fire Chief s requirements regarding fire flow calculations, the location of fire hydrants, fire department connections, and fire lane signage. b. The developer shall vacate the existing easements and dedicated new easements on the property. c. The Property Owners Association (HOA) documents for review and approval by staff. d. Architectural design guidelines shall be reviewed and approved by staff. e. The City's development fees will apply to this project. The fee amounts will be calculated and included as part of the Development Agreement. A development agreement shall be executed and all fees shall be paid. 7. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall comply with the following conditions. a. The applicant shall record the final plat, development agreement and all other documentation at Washington County and provide the City with proof of recording. ADOPTED by the City Council this 4th day of May, 2020. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk RESOLUTION 2020- APPROVING A SITE PLAN FOR CATTLE HOUSE RESTAURANT ON PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF 147TH STREET NORTH AND EAST OF HIGHWAY 61 (FOREST BOULEVARD NORTH) WHEREAS, Anthony Harmening, has requested approval of a site plan for an approximately 5,700 square foot restaurant building on property that is legally described as follows: See Attached WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said site plan and recommends approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve site plan for TGK Automotive, under the following conditions: 1. A site plan is approved in accordance with the plans submitted on January 17, 2020, and April 10, 2020, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Prior to the installation of any signs, the developer shall obtain a sign permit. 3. Any expansions of the building will require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 4. The improvements on the property shall be maintained by the developer. 5. A stormwater re -use system shall be further evaluated. If it is feasible, it shall constructed. Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 5. All items on the Engineer's memo and "red -line" detailed engineering comments that have been sent directly to the developer's engineer dated April 1, 2020, shall be addressed. 6. All items in the MnDOT comment letter dated February 26, 2020, shall be addressed. An access permit shall be issued by MN DOT. 7. An eight foot easement shall be dedicated for right of way for the future expansion of TH 61. 8. A trail easement shall be dedicated to the City for the trail along the lake and connections to the south and north. Resolution 2020- Page 2 9. The boardwalk and dock shall be reviewed and approved by the MnDNR and the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) Architecture/Building Material 10. The developer shall provide a material samples and proposed colors for all building materials for review and approval by staff. 11. The developer shall provide construction details and material samples for the deck for review and approval by staff. If railings are installed, the details and design shall be reviewed and approved by staff. 12. The developer shall provide details for the awning for review and approval by staff. 13. The developer shall provide details and building materials for the boardwalk and dock for review and approval by staff. 14. The developer shall provide details for the glass for review and approval by staff. 15. The elevations shall be revised to include a stone sill, or comparable material, between the stacked stone and other building materials to provide a transition between the different materials. Streets and Access 16. An access easement shall be dedicated across the property for the benefit of adjoining properties to the north and south. The easement language is subject to review and approval of staff. 17. The developer shall work with the property owned to the north along Highway 61 on access. Miscellaneous 18. The developer shall continue to work with City staff on the lighting plan and type of lighting fixtures. The final plan shall be reviewed and approved by staff. 19. A stormwater re -use system shall be further evaluated. If it is feasible, it shall contracted. 20. The developer shall continue to work with the City on the location of the trail and what portions will be constructed with the development. Resolution 2020- Page 3 Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 21. Landscaping shall be fully installed per approved landscape plan. 22. All of the improvements shall be constructed per the approved plans. 23. All roof top mechanical equipment must be screened from view of adjacent properties. Staff shall perform an inspection when equipment is installed to ensure compliance with City code. 24. Drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated to the City over the stormwater management facilities. 25. The developer will be responsible for maintaining stormwater facilities and vegetation proposed as a part of the project. A maintenance agreement between the City and the developer shall be reviewed and approved by the City then recorded against the property. ADOPTED by the City Council this 4th day of May, 2020. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk wsb April 1, 2020 Ms. Rachel Juba Community Development Director City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: Site Plan — Preliminary Plat Review Cattle House Restaurant & Event Center WSB Project No. 015525-000 Dear Ms. Juba: We have reviewed the preliminary plat and site plan submittal for the above -referenced project. In particular, we have reviewed the following plans related to this particular request: • Cattle House Restaurant & Event Center PUD, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review combined plan set dated 3/2/2020 prepared by Architectural Consortium, LLC. and Elan Design Lab, Inc. • Preliminary Report- Stormwater Management System dated 3/2/2020 prepared by Elan Design Lab, Inc. • Geotechnical Exploration and Engineering Review prepared by NTI, dated January 16, 2020. • Preliminary Plat dated 01/16/2020 prepared by Cornerstone Land Surveying, Inc. Based on the review of the site plan documents, we offer the following comments related to this application: Site Plan/Utilitites 1. The applicant will need to apply for an MPCA NPDES permit due to the size of the area disturbed. The City will need to receive a copy of this permit in advance of any work taking place. 2. Minor flood plain impacts are proposed as part of the proposed plan. The applicant will be providing compensatory storage to ensure there are not any flood plain impacts. 3. An existing 15" sanitary sewer main extends through the property and will serve the proposed development. 4. An existing 8" watermain along TH 61 and an 8" watermain within Fondant Avenue North will provide the site with water service. Staff has recommended looping the watermain from the dead-end water main on Fondant Avenue North to the watermain along TH 61. This looping will improve water quality and system reliability. Staff is working with the adjacent landowner to acquire an easement to accommodate this connection. The property owner has indicated they are willing to provide this easement. 5. A Miscellaneous Work Permit for MNDOT for the water connection within the right-of-way of TH 61 will be required. Ms. Rachel Juba April 1, 2020 Page 2 Stormwater Management 6. The applicant is proposing to utilize pervious pavement and infiltration basins to conform with stormwater management requirements. 7. Required freeboard from groundwater, 100-year high water levels, and emergency overflow elevations with respect to the lowest floor elevation are met. 8. City staff is working with the applicant on maintenance agreement requirements for stormwater features that will be their responsibility. Stormwater features will be required to have drainage and utility easements. 9. A MNDOT drainage permit will be required to ensure that current drainage rates to MNDOT right-of-way will not be increased. Transportation/ROW/Easements/Agreements 10. The developer has identified a concept for the entire property, however they are proposing only to build on the northerly portion of the site identified as phase 1. 11. Consistent with the Access Management Plan and Memorandum of Agreement, the applicant is identifying an additional 8-feet of Right -of -Way along TH 61. 12. The plan proposes two access locations, one at the 146th Street (southerly access) and one at the northern portion of the site for access to the proposed restaurant. The southern access is already developed on Trunk Highway 61, while the northerly proposed entrance is not currently set up for a southbound left turn lane or a north bound right turn lane. 13. MNDOT has provided a review letter dated February 26, 2020. Comments within this review letter will need to be addressed. Most of these comments are routine in nature, however the comments related to traffic safety will require additional study. Since the northern access will require geometric changes to TH 61, it will need to be reviewed through the Level 2 Layout review process. This process will identify if the northerly access can be constructed as proposed and if it can remain as a full access once the southerly entrance is constructed. 14. Access permits for the north and south access locations will be required from MNDOT. 15. Existing easements on the property are proposed to be vacated and new easements for existing sanitary sewer, proposed watermain, proposed trail, proposed stormwater management features, and the additional 8-feet of ROW along TH 61 will be granted. 16. A cross parking agreement will be required to accommodate the proposed vision for the entire site. Wetland 17. The applicant is proposing a board walk within the wetland area as part of this project. 18. Wetland impacts are avoided with the proposed improvements. Under the Wetland Conservation Act boardwalks can be constructed in wetlands and qualify for a no -loss since the posts/pilings are not considered fill. The applicant will be required to apply for a "no -loss" permit for documentation purposes. 19. The developer will need to apply for a permit from the DNR in MPARS for the portion of dock/boardwalk located within the wetland below the ordinary high water (OHW) level of Egg Lake. Water Reuse Plan 20. Stormwater reuse is not proposed to be incorporated into this project. Stormwater management features proposed can't support the demand. Ms. Rachel Juba April 1, 2020 Page 3 Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this project. Additional detailed red -lined comments have been provided to the applicant's engineer. These comments will need to be addressed prior to approval of the construction plans. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 651-286-8463. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Mark Erichson, PE City Engineer cc: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director (email only) Liz Finnegan, Senior Engineering Technician (email only) Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant (email only) Tony Harmening, Cattle House, LLC (email only) Steve Johnston, Elan Design Lab (email only) DEPARTMENT OF 1 TRANSPORTATION February 26, 2020 Emily Weber Community Development Assistant City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 SUBJECT: MnDOT Review # P20-006 Cattle House Restaurant NE Quad US61 (Forest Blvd North) & 146rh Street North Hugo, Washington County Dear Ms. Weber, Metropolitan District Waters Edge Building 1500 County Road B2 West Roseville, MN 55113 Thank you for the opportunity to review the Cattle House Restaurant development. MnDOT has reviewed the documents and has the following comments: Water Resources: A MnDOT drainage permit will be required to ensure that current drainage rates to MnDOT right- of-way will not be increased. The drainage permit application, including the information below, should be submitted online to: httns:Hdotgpp7.dot,state,mn,us/OLPA The following information must be submitted with the drainage permit application: 1) A grading plan showing existing and proposed contours. 2) Drainage area maps for the proposed project showing existing and proposed drainage areas. Any off -site areas that drain to the project area should also be included in the drainage area maps. The direction of flow for each drainage area must be indicated by arrows. 3) Drainage computations for pre and post construction conditions during the 2, 10, 50 and 100 year rain events. 4) Time of concentration calculations. 4) An electronic copy of any computer modeling used for the drainage computations. 5) See also the Drainage Permits Checklist (referenced below) for more information. Once a drainage permit application is submitted, a thorough review will be completed and additional information may be requested. An equal opportunity employer MnDOT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113 Drainage permit application can be found at: http://www,dot.state.nm,us/utility/forms.html- Application for Drainage Permit A copy of MnDOT's Drainage Permits Checklist is attached. For questions on these points or to submit additional information, please call Jason Swenson, MnDOT Metro District Water Resources Engineering, at (651) 234-7539 or email Jason. Swenson@state.mn.us Permits: As mentioned previously, a Drainage Permit will be required. Also, Access Permits will be required for the south access to US 61, and a Miscellaneous Work Permit for the water connection within the right -of --way of US 61. Any other use of, or work within or affecting, MnDOT right of way will require additional permits. Permit forms are available and may be submitted online at: https:Hdotapp7.dot.state.mn.us/OLPA . Please direct questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section at 651-234-7911 or Buck.Craigna.state.mn.us. Traffic Safety: In order to maintain safety for southbound motorists turning into the site, the southern access which uses the existing left turn lane should be used for both the initial and final phases of development. Since the northern access will require geometric changes to US 61, it will need to be reviewed through the Level 2 Layout review process. The MnDOT Metro Area Engineer, Ryan Coddington, will be able to guide you through the layout review process. The following website provides layout design guidance and identify layout requirements: http://www.dot. state.mn.us/design/geometric/index.html The first link under Guidance is helpful, as well as the Design Resources tab. Please direct questions regarding the Leve12 Layout review process to Ryan Coddington, MnDOT Area Engineer at 651-234-7714 or Rvan.Coddington(a�state.mn.us. Materials: In general the plan sheets submitted don't }provide enough detail to review thoroughly. Providing more detail with respect to existing roadway features (centerline, edge line, etc.) would be helpful. It may be necessary for roadway Geotech investigations to be performed to determine whether the in place pavement is capable of handling the shifted traffic. For more information or for clarification, please contact Dave Van Deusen. Materials and Pavement at 651-234-7350 or dave.vandeusen(a�state.mn.us. MnDOT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113 ADA Office: There are Federal requirements for the pedestrian crossings at the entrance to the driveways. The ADA office has made comments (in RED) on the Pt 1. PUD Submittal sent by the developer. The plans with their comments are attached, as well as additional information about Curb Ramp Standards. For more information or for clarification, please contact Joseph Zilka, ADA Office at 651-366-3311 or ioseph.zilka state.mn.us. Bicycle/Pedestrian: As the development will be opposite the Hardwood Creek Bicycle Trail, MnDOT suggests adding bike racks or similar locking facility at the restaurant to accommodate any cyclists who wish to stop and dine. For more information, or for clarification, please contact Mackenzie Turner Bargen, Multi -modal, at 651-234-7879 or Mackenzie TurnerBargen@state.mn.us, Review Submittal Options MnDOT's goal is to complete reviews within 30 calendar days. Review materials received electronically can be processed more rapidly. Do not submit files via a cloud service or SharePoint link. In order of preference, review materials may be submitted as: 1. Email documents and plans in PDF format to metrodovreviews.dotnastate.mn.us. Attachments may not exceed 20 megabytes per email. Documents can be zipped as well. If multiple emails are necessary, number each message. 2. PDF file(s) uploaded to MnDOT's external shared internet workspace site at: https://mft.dot.state.mn.us. Contact MnDOT Planning development review staff at metrodevreviews.doi@state.mn.us for uploading instructions, and send an email listing the file name(s) after the document(s) has/have been uploaded. 3. Mailed or hand delivered documents in PDF format on a flash drive or CD-ROM to: MnDOT — Metro District Planning Section Development Reviews Coordinator 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113 4. Printed documents via mail or hand delivery to the address above. Include one set of full- size plans. If you have any questions concerning this review please contact me at (651) 234-7797. Sincerely, /V0� Cameron Muhic Senior Planner MnDOT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113 Copy sent via E-Mail: Buck Craig, Permits Ryan Coddington, Area Engineer Michael Kowski, Engineering Services Jason Swenson, Water Resources Kaare Festvog, Traffic Shane Rowbotham, Design Joseph Zilka, ADA Shelly Pedersen, Materials Michael Lynch, Right -of --Way Keith Jakober, Surveys Bryce Fossand, Water Resources Russell Owen, Metropolitan Council Lance Schowalter, Design Mackenzie Turner Bargen, Multi -modal David Van Deusen, Materials MnDOT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road 62 West, Roseville, MN 55113 I *ty of Hugo Downtown Plan & Design Guidelines April 10, 2007 Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Credits & Acknowledgements: We would like to thank the City of Hugo's citizens — the residents and business owners — who attended the workshops and meetings, sent in their comments and gave their time to participate in the planning process Their input has been invaluable in developing a master plan and design guidelines for the downtown area. We would like to thank the City of Hugo's City Council, Planning Commission, City staff and consultants for leading this planning process. Funding for development of the downtown design guidelines and the preparation of this document was provided by a Livable Communities Opportunity Grant from the Metropolitan Council in 2004. City Council Fran Miron, Mayor Becky Petryk, Council Member Ward 1 Frank Puleo, Council Member Ward 2 Chuck Haas, Council Member Ward 3 Mike Granger, Council Member At Large Planning Commission Dave Schumann, Chairperson Bronwen Kleissler Tom Weidt Ron McRoberts Victoria Hoffbeck Bob Rosenquist Kelly Bailly City of Hugo Mike Ericson, City Administrator Bryan Bear, Community Development Director Michele Lindau, Community Development Assistant Mary Ann Creager, City Clerk Jay Kennedy, City Engineer (WSB) Kendra Lindahl, City Planner (Landform) Planning & Urban Design Consultant Carolyn Krall, AIA LANDFQRM Page 1 of 23 Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Hugo Downtown Planning Framework Incorporated in 1906, Hugo is a rural small town with a family -oriented feel. As Hugo grew, the intersection of Forest Boulevard (now Highway 61) and Frenchman Road (now 145t' Street) became the center of town. With a train depot and an active feed mill, this was the ideal location for local, small businesses. A downtown neighborhood began to grow into a comfortable, rural village. It is this small village familiarity that the residents of Hugo wish to preserve. Aerial Photograph of Hugo in 1974 Minnesota Historical Society The Hugo Downtown Framework Plan and Design Guidelines are intended to provide direction to new development in downtown Hugo and, where needed, to shape plans for redevelopment. The Plan illustrates the type of commercial and residential development, civic and community facilities, and amenities envisioned by the citizens of Hugo. The Plan extends beyond the central commercial business district (CBD) to illustrate the entire downtown commercial area of Hugo, both existing and envisioned in the future. This vision of future development in Hugo encourages commercial growth, while seeking to concentrate that growth, around the downtown area. The Planning Process The Hugo downtown plan and preliminary design guidelines were originally developed in 1998 to address redevelopment of the downtown commercial "Main Street" on Forest Boulevard (Highway 61). But the County Road 8 improvements and rerouting required that the original plan be revisited. The new plan was needed to address the developable area along County Road 8 and to consider the impact of the new County Road 8 and Highway 61 intersection. This planning process began in the fall of 2003 and included workshops with the City Council and downtown business and property owners. A community -wide open house was held in May 2004 to encourage public input on the final plan. In August 2004, the City was awarded an Opportunity Grant from the Livable Communities Demonstration Account to develop design guidelines for the downtown area to assist in implementation of the downtown plan. The process for developing these guidelines has continued through 2005-2006 with significant public participation in the planning process. Page 2 of 23 Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines The Influence of Transportation Improvements A major influence on the plan is the County's re -alignment and improvement of County Road 8. The county's plan will widen and reroute the road to the south, connecting to Highway 61 at approximately 143rd Street. The County Road 8 re- alignment will have a significant impact on the downtown, offering opportunities for growth, improved vehicle and pedestrian access around the downtown area, and the potential for redevelopment to make improvements to the core of the downtown CBD and surrounding public and civic spaces. It is vital that the CBD not be cut off from County Road 8 and from the high volume of traffic which will use this route to access the interstate. Highway 61 is planned to continue to run north and south through downtown and the CBD. Despite projections of increased traffic volumes, this highway should not be widened beyond four lanes except to provide for turn movements. Instead, improvements to the roadway and access improvements can help accommodate the increased volumes. The downtown plan recommends improvements to improve street access and connectivity within downtown, as well as enhancements to pedestrian access and walkability. Y Future Signal Future Road Alignments City ❑l Hugo Washing[on County, MN The plan also calls for extending the regional trail south across County Road 8 on the existing railroad bed and allows for the possibility of future commuter transit within this corridor (in the railroad ROW or on Highway 61). If Hugo is to continue to have a healthy downtown, it is important to plan for these future transportation changes. Page 3 of 23 Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Defining Downtown The downtown CBD in Hugo has always been located on Forest Boulevard (Highway 61) on both sides of the main traffic signal at 145th Street. But over time, the commercial area has grown and extended north and south along Highway 61, and the new development has been less compact and more auto- or highway -oriented than the older, more traditional downtown CBD. Without planning controls, this same pattern of commercial development could be expected to occur along the improved and upgraded County Road 8. While the core downtown central business district (CBD) is focused along Forest Boulevard - Highway 61 from County Road 8 to 147th Street, the Downtown Plan extends north to the Post Office and 150th Street, south to 140th Street, and from the shores of Egg Lake on the east to the bend in County Road 8 to the west. One of Hugo's planning goals is to maintain a more compact and concentrated downtown CBD. This goal will be achieved by encouraging new development in and around the core of the downtown area, while planning for limited but well -ordered commercial development in specific areas along other commercial routes such as Highway 61 and County Road 8. Community feedback has consistently supported new CBD uses which complement downtown (such as restaurants and entertainment) and suggest that larger, single -use development and auto sales/service businesses, for instance, be located in commercial areas planned closer to 1-35. Page 4 of 23 Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines To create a sense of arrival in downtown, the plan recommends placing gateway elements — a landscaped sign, monument, or other feature — at these key entry points into downtown. While the plan doesn't specify the elements at each location, when you enter downtown you should know that you are downtown. New development at these "gateway" locations should be planned not only to allow for these gateway elements but to convey the sense of quality and character that the downtown plan envisions. Gateway elements — signs, flags or monuments — should be included in the new downtown area to welcome a resident or visitor into an established and thriving downtown. Elements depicting the quality and character of downtown Hugo are displayed based on the historical and current architectural elements of Hugo. Proposed monument sign, Nov. 29, 2004 RSP Architects for Contractor Property Development Company The Downtown Plan The plan is a tool to help the City of Hugo create a pedestrian -friendly downtown and concentrates new development and redevelopment around the existing intersection of 145t" Street and Highway 61. As Hugo continues to develop, the actual projects built may differ from the Illustrative Downtown Plan in the details of the development of any specific block or site, but the primary elements of the plan, including the public infrastructure (roads, parks, trails, open space) and the quality and character which makes this plan unique to Hugo are expected to be maintained. Page 5 of 23 Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines The Downtown Plan Improved park with future community center Traditional residential blocks New mixed -use development with - housing, offices and complementary retail/commercial uses New mixed -use development blending office and multi -family housing uses ,Fj7 Proposed trail connections u■ q;jI - ,� Hugo Downtown Framework IlVorth City park with trails, gazebo, dock, pedestrian bridge Shared public parking Carpenters on the Lake Walkable community spaces along trail ROW Additional downtown senior housing Page 6 of 23 Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Design Guidelines The intent of the Hugo Downtown Design Guidelines is to provide a baseline for quality in order to revitalize and expand the downtown business district. These guidelines are written to meet the community's goals: Goal 1: Preserve the rural small town character of Hugo Goal 2: Establish a threshold or baseline for design and quality Goal 3: Maintain a harmonious visual environment within the existing architectural context Goal 4: Communicate the community's high expectations for new development in Hugo Obiectives The specific objectives for downtown Hugo design guidelines are: • To establish a clear definition of urban design standards that informs property owners, developers, builders and decision -makers. • To serve as a tool that planners and designers can use and incorporate into their plans to achieve and support the City's design objectives. • To act as a basis for a uniform and consistent review of development and redevelopment proposals by the City Council and Planning Commission. The design guidelines which apply specifically to the CBD also include principles that can be broadly applied to the entire Hugo Downtown Area. Downtown CBD The Design Guidelines apply specifically to the central business district or "Old Downtown" concentrated around Highway 61, from 147t" Street to the new County Road 8 intersection. The guidelines provide more detailed definitions of requirements for site planning, placement of building mass, materials, architecture, lighting, signage, and design of the public realm. Page 7 of 23 Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Framework Principles for Downtown Hugo RIC *i AV l 1. Preserve and celebrate Hugo's small town character. 2. Enhance the public realm, to maintain a pedestrian -oriented downtown. 3. Expand civic space and uses around City Hall. 4. Add new retail which complements existing businesses and shops and supports downtown neighborhoods. 5. Encourage unique small businesses to locate downtown and larger, single -use developments closer to the 1-35 corridor. 6. Provide life -cycle housing to encourage senior -living in the downtown area. 7. Provide recreational uses for diverse age groups in the downtown area. 8. Improve downtown access and circulation with improvements to Highway 61 and downtown intersections (147t", 145t", County Road 8). 9. Reduce the impact of development close to Egg Lake to improve lake quality and preserve wildlife habitat. 10. Build upon unique assets such as the church, feed mill and City Hall with complementary design and materials. Page 8 of 23 Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Downtown District Design Guidelines General Design Standards • These design guidelines are intended to apply to the Downtown District CBD, but include principles that can be broadly applied to the greater Hugo Downtown Area (as indicated on the Downtown Plan), including the Central Business, Future Central Business and Central Residential zones If the CBD development extends beyond this boundary, the Downtown District boundaries may need to be extended accordingly. • On all streets in the downtown district, the guidelines are intended to apply to street frontage properties on both sides of the street. • New downtown development shall provide for pedestrian as well as vehicular circulation and shall create linkages to existing and proposed sidewalks and trails. • All new development should be sensitive to existing downtown neighborhoods and residences in the design and location of new uses and buildings with respect to shading, views, light or noise pollution; where necessary appropriate screening or buffering shall be provided. • All new development shall be designed to value, respect, and preserve identified natural features and resources. • A sense of City history should be encouraged, and landmarks such as St. John's Cemetery and St. John's Church should be preserved as important contributors to Hugo's character. • Key points which have been identified as primary entrances to downtown Hugo should be designed as "gateways" to the City; gateway elements could include open space, unique landscaping, walls or gates, water features and City identity signage. These points include: • From the west — the bend in the County Road 8 at the western edge of Hugo; • From the east — At Egg Lake and the intersections where 147th and 140th meet Highway 61; • From the south — Where 140th meets Highway 61; • From the north — Where 147th meets Highway 61. Along the west side of Highway 61, new downtown development will need to be designed to integrate with the railway corridor as it comes through the center of town: as a public open space, supporting the proposed trails, and considering future uses. Page 9 of 23 Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines General Land Use • Downtown development should be appropriate for a traditional downtown area: mixed - use buildings combining retail, commercial, and residential uses, and encouragement of multi -story buildings in the downtown. • Neighborhood retail, service, and commercial buildings and uses which support downtown residential neighborhoods such as drug stores, banks, and specialty markets or small grocers are encouraged. • Destination retail, restaurant and entertainment uses, particularly mixed with compatible, complementary, or other synergistic uses, are highly encouraged. • New auto -dominated commercial development such as fast food, auto service, or similar high traffic drive -through facilities and large, single -use developments are discouraged in the downtown CBD. • Uses appropriate to the downtown area such as banks, coffee shops and pharmacies which enhance their business by providing drive -through services may be permitted provided they are designed to minimize impact on local downtown traffic circulation and pedestrian access. • Parking lots should only be allowed as an accessory use, except for municipal or public district parking; larger parking areas should be broken up into smaller areas to reduce the overall area of paving and promote a friendlier pedestrian environment. • New residential development should provide for the full range of life -cycle housing, offering choices of housing types (single -level flats, condominiums or lofts, single -level and multi -story townhouses, and single-family attached or detached), styles and prices, at a density appropriate to the downtown area. • New residential development should be sensitive to existing residential neighborhoods and incorporate well -designed transitions from multi -family to existing single-family residential areas. • Traditional neighborhood design (TND) based on a traditional street grid is a desirable option for downtown, medium -density areas. Single-family homes (detached or attached) or row townhomes should line the street with front porches and stoops, front yards, sidewalks and boulevards with regularly spaced trees and street lights. Garage access at rear of house .TND example with traditional street grid and porches facing the street Sidewalks and boulevards on both sides of the street with regularly spaced street trees Page 10 of 23 Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines All downtown residential developments should be planned and designed to minimize paving for driveways and surface parking. Garage -forward or "snout -house" homes or townhomes are highly discouraged. Highly Discouraged: Example of Garage -forward design, dominating view from sidewalk and street. Streets, Public Space & Amenities Forest Boulevard (Highway 61) and 145th Street should be restored to be closer to their original, traditional downtown "Main Street" form, lined with street trees and planters, pedestrian street lights, and street furniture including benches and trash receptacles. The fixtures that are selected for these streets should be required continuously within the downtown CBD district and highly encouraged throughout the downtown commercial area for visual continuity. Downtown intersections should be designed to be safe for pedestrians; enhancements to safety include use of textured -colored paving or striping to mark crosswalks, narrowed or throated intersections, pedestrian -oriented street lighting, planted center medians or landscaped boulevards, and warning signage at busy crossings along Highway 61, such as 147th, 145th and County Road 8. Change in paving or striping marks the safe crossing zone for pedestrians at major crosswalks. Planted center medians or landscaped boulevards provide resting points for pedestrians at major crosswalks, facilitate turning movements, and help calm traffic speeds. Page 11 of 23 Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines To be safe for both pedestrians and vehicles, downtown Hugo should include street improvements: narrowed intersections, pedestrian lighting (top left), planted medians (top right and bottom left), and visible signs warning of pedestrian crossings/vehicular speed decrease (top right). • The City street grid is a vital part of the way the downtown functions, so restoring streets or adding new streets that connect to the existing street grid are encouraged; disconnected streets and cul-de-sacs are highly discouraged. • Forest Boulevard (Highway 61) and 145th Street are the original "Main Streets" of downtown and, to an extent, the few remaining brick buildings along these streets should be preserved, renovated, or restored to productive use; new buildings close to these older structures warrant careful attention to design and detailing in order to relate well to the original structures. • The small park which is planned on Highway 61 across from City Hall is intended to act as a Town Square or Village Green — a community focal point with passive uses (green space, gardens, historical markers) and active uses (a gazebo, lake overlook, Farmers Market) incorporated into the design. Civic and mixed -use buildings should be located adjacent to the Town Square or Village Green, welcoming visitors to downtown Hugo. • The plan proposes a future pedestrian bridge over Highway 61, connecting the park and Egg Lake to City Hall and the bulk of the downtown area. This bridge, if well -designed, could also act as a visual cue to drivers to reduce speed and could create a sense of arrival and welcome for the downtown CBD. Page 12 of 23 Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines The edge along the railroad ROW and the Hardwood Creek Regional Trail along the west side of Highway 61 should be maintained as an open -space corridor connecting City Hall and the CBD to new development to the south. This edge should include: • trail connections for bicycles and winter sports uses • landscaping to act as a year-round buffer; • pedestrian -oriented trail and street lighting; • places to rest with benches, planters and trash receptacles. On downtown streets where retail and commercial uses are proposed, on -street parking is encouraged; streets should be designed with the parking lane designated either by curbing or with a change in paving materials. Downtown district streets should allow for public right-of-way between the curb and the building wall, a minimum 10'-12' wide. This area should be "zoned" to provide for street signs, landscaping and street trees, and both street and sidewalk lighting closest to the curb. There should be a clear pedestrian walking path in the center, and then an area designated for seating or other street furniture (trash receptacles, bus benches, etc) and commercial opportunities (including newspaper boxes). Where necessary, such as where the street ROW does not allow for a wider sidewalk, these amenities may need to be accommodated within the parcel boundaries. Page 13 of 23 Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Minimum ROW from curb to buildit (10'-12') 2'-3' Shop related furniture & ameniti 5'-6' Walking Area 3' Public Area: trash receptacles, newspaper stands streetlights, signs & street trees plan where sidewalk wi nother option is a defined 20' ead-in angled parking zone Page 14 of 23 Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Architecture • Architecture of new buildings should be respectful of the existing historical structures which enhance the character of Hugo; design which reflects the elements of vernacular "Main Street", Hugo's French trading post roots, or mid -western "prairie style" architecture is encouraged: Well defined roof line tivx Al Cornice or roof lineL _ _���distinguishes 1st story from I 1St story with glazed 2"dstoryr z display windows Ill�i �i11'.��I� lWll�lllCiit iWliilll ii • �ti f� _� i� ���Mill Awnings with accent lighting and graphics instead of applied signs IRP ki Building base expressed with masonry Entry feature; well distinguished and covered from the weather r Early trading post and mill buildings in rural Minnesota were often made of stone with a simple gabled roof and expressed chimney. Page 15 of 23 Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Traditional Main Street style building: flat roofs, often an extended or false parapet on "front" side or marking the main entrance. Prairie Style: roofs are hipped, low and spreading with deep overhangs and eaves; Hugo City Hall has many of these elements. Hugo was once a French trading post, and many residents have expressed a desire to reflect those roots in the architecture of the downtown. Appropriate architectural elements include: steeper or mansard roofs with dormer windows, open storefronts with awnings, and exterior plaster, stone and brick. Page 16 of 23 Final Plan & Design Guidelines Hugo Downtown Framework Plan • Architecture of new buildings should be built upon Hugo's existing assets such as the church, the feed mill, and the new City Hall, with complementary design and sense of scale. • Buildings should be designed to relate well to the existing natural and man-made environment and stay within context in massing, materials, style and color; design of the landscape and hardscape should be coordinated and harmonious with the building design and materials. • Buildings should be constructed and maintained for permanence and longevity; therefore durable, maintainable materials (brick, stone, etc.) should be used; temporary buildings, metal sheds, etc. shall not be permitted. New "Main Street" buildings should complement an established downtown through their architectural character. • Building entries should be visible from the street, well lit, covered or protected from weather, and include significant glazing and glass doors where the public will be entering buildings. Page 17 of 23 Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines • Awnings, overhangs and arcades are encouraged where pedestrians are expected to walk and shop ; flat awnings are preferred (no barrel awnings) with adequate clearance above sidewalk. • Building design elements should include an expression of a building base (of brick or stone), a middle, and a top with cornice elements at the top of the first floor and the top of the building. • Buildings should be designed with "four-sided architecture", using the same quality materials on all sides: • all facades shall be articulated with a variety of materials, glazing, awnings, or other details to add visual interest; • roof lines and cornice details shall be completed in a three-dimensional manner so that the features on the back of the roof or similar unfinished areas are not visible; • the front fagade may have a unique design or more significant glazing. • Buildings should be oriented to the street with fully articulated street facades based on traditional storefronts (doors and display windows) along the sidewalk. • Zero Lot Line commercial buildings are allowed and highly encouraged on all streets within the downtown district. • Along CR 8 and Hwy 61, entrances may be oriented to a side or rear parking lot, as long as the entry also has good pedestrian access and visibility from the street, and any building wall along these streets must contain significant amounts of "real" windows. • Equipment, mechanical systems, transformers, trash enclosures, etc. must be screened from view in a way that is integral to the architecture of the building with similar materials: • metal fencing or a mechanical vent screen alone is not sufficient; • access to these service areas needs to be provided at the alley, side or rear of the building. Rooftop equipment shall be screened from the line of site of pedestrians and integrated into the design and massing of the roof form s r r w ` 47� %.A 0 Page 18 of 23 Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Parking & Service Areas • Within the downtown CBD, shared parking is encouraged to take advantage of varying parking demands between mixed uses. • Businesses are encouraged to establish or participate in a municipal parking district providing shared, public parking with reductions in required on -site parking. • Parking should not be located between a building and the street or main road the building faces and be distributed around the building, especially to the side and back of buildings. • Parking adjacent to the street should be minimized; • Where a parking lot is located along a street, the same zero -lot -line or setback conditions of the adjacent buildings should be maintained with a wall, ornamental fence, or similar landscape elements to continue the built edge along the street. • Where a parking lot is located along a street, it should be well landscaped and screened with a combination of fencing or wall plantings along the street edge. 6' zone between parking and sidewalk with fence or wall centered in zone indscaped edge combines fence th trees, low shrubs and ground ver for parking lot screening and iffering along the street Page 19 of 23 Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines • Larger parking areas (over 25 vehicles) should be planned with internal landscaping, pedestrian sidewalks or walkways and be divided into smaller areas where possible: ■ pedestrian walkways provided in larger parking lots should be landscaped, include path lighting, and provide direct access for pedestrians to an entrance of a commercial building; ■ walkways should be raised, paved areas or defined paths distinguished by striping or a change in paving provided that pedestrians are kept safe from vehicular travel on the route to an entrance of a commercial building. �fi Pedestrian walkways through busy parking lots are important because they provide a safe, well lit, direct access to the entrance of a building. Larger parking lots should have pedestrian walkways that are clearly identified and combined with landscaping to break up large areas of pavement. Page 20 of 23 Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Buildings should be oriented to minimize views of service areas and loading docks from the street; service areas should be buffered with a combination of landscaping and screening; mechanical equipment and trash areas must be fully enclosed and integrated into the architecture using the same materials as the building: • metal fencing or a mechanical vent screen alone is not sufficient; • access to these service areas needs to be provided at the alley, side or rear of the building. Residential buildings (single-family homes and multi -family buildings) should be oriented to minimize views of garages and parking areas from the street: • free-standing or detached garages should not be allowed for multi -family residences. • parking should be located below buildings or underground where possible. Below -grade parking: side or rear access. Garages should not be as invisible from the street as possible to create a traditional neighborhood feel. Page 21 of 23 Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Signage • Downtown signage is critical to the character of the area, especially at night; all downtown signage is subject to careful review with the City and must comply with all zoning and ordinance requirements for size, placement, materials, etc; • Signage and graphics should be integral to the building architecture or used as a decorative design element. Back -lit, box signs are not acceptable downtown. • Decorative neon, moving or other decorative sign types are desirable only when displayed within storefront window interiors of downtown buildings. • Corporate chains are encouraged to customize their architecture to express their design "brand" within a design, context, and material appropriate to the character of downtown Hugo. Projecting or Hanging Sign Wall Sign integrated into the building design I IL Awning sign should be located. awning - or fringe Pmjesdirtg or Hanging Signs, Building Face & Mndum Signs. Page 22 of 23 Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Open Space and Storm Water Management New development should provide both private and public usable open space, plazas etc; these spaces should be connected to existing or proposed trail and sidewalk networks. • The downtown area should plan cohesively for storm water management and for improving the water quality of Hugo, however, where possible rain gardens or similar infiltration and holding areas should be integrated into the design of parking areas; design which harmonizes more groomed and landscaped areas with more natural landscape is encouraged: and soil provide filtration • Storm water ponds, rain gardens and other storm water management or holding areas shall be designed to be attractive in both flooded and dry conditions; use of native plants for filtration around pond and wetlands and other sustainable design approaches to site and landscape design are encouraged: -1 Filtration Egg Lake Vegetation More formal Trail or and groomed Sidewalk landscape Page 23 of 23 A 5,665 SF Cattle House Restaurant is proposed as phase 1 of the city owned property on Hwy 61 and Egg Lake. The restaurant will be a family style steakhouse and bar with a brand that reflects a local and organic menu for gathering families and events. The building is designed to accommodate a future 200 capacity event center that would share the kitchen facility. The developer/ owner Tony Harmening has extensive catering experience that will be beneficial in orchestrating community gatherings. SITE PLAN FEATURES The entire site is master planned to accommodate the restaurant and parking in phase 1 with room for a future event center. Future phases have been planned to provide buildings along the highway for an urban character. The plan takes advantage of views to the lake as well as maintaining views of the lake from Hwy 61.The street is lined with extensive landscaping and 16' tall decorative light pole fixtures to reinforce the pedestrian experience. The entire site has pedestrian connections throughout with trails along the lake and connections to other structures. A large outdoor wood deck is over looking the lake and the building is situated to take advantage of the views. Along the lake is a variety of walking surfaces including wood plank and concrete and features multiple opportunities for interacting with the lake with benches, fire pit and a seasonal dock. The restaurant is surrounded by recreational activities such as horseshoes, corn hole toss in the summer and broomball, snowmobiling and fir pit in the winter. On off- peak hours a farmers market with local vendors could occur in the parking lots that could reinforce the organic and local branding of the restaurant. These activities would be a great way to gather the community. ARCHITECTURE The restaurant interior will have an industrial barn -like feel with heavy timber beams and large open ceilings. Fire places are located in the entry as well as the lounge area. The exterior architecture is designed with a large sloped roof that opens up to the lake. Horizontal cornices, awnings and window frames are reflective of prairie -style. Large overhead glass doors open up to the deck and window patterns with upper transoms reinforce the prairie -style. The large sloped roof and simple box -shaped massing takes its cues from the grain silos across the highway as well as prairie style forms. The tall stone mass has a great presence as you enter the site and provides a grand backdrop for the sign. This tall mass also screens the rooftop units by parapet The barnwood facades feature living walls of vines growing on trellises that promote the organic nature of the business. High quality materials such as stone, timbers, glass and barnwood siding combine for a rustic/ industrial vibe. The wall mounted decorative light fixtures feature prairie style horizontal banding and will wash the walls at night to make a warm appearance from the highway and the lake. The architecture of the future buildings would incorporate the same palate of materials established with the restaurant and feature simple massing and windows that are reflective of prairie style. CIVIL ENGINEERING To address stormwater management requirements and to limit impervious surfaces the entire parking lot will be paved with a porous bituminous mixture. The building will be served with sanitary sewer from the existing main that runs along the shoreline. The developer will work with the city to extend a new watermain through the site to provide redundancy to an aging city system. TRAFFIC The first phase access will be on the northen edge of the site. The future phases access would be full access aligning with 146t' Street, and the first phase access would become a right in/ out only. Parking is shared throughout the site and offers easy access for all uses. The ratios for each phase are in line with industry standards for food and retail uses. Retail 10,100 SF 40.4 stalls required 51 stalls proposed Restaurant 5,000 SF 66.6 required 50 stalls proposed (69 installed in phase 1) Event Center (200 seats) 133.3 stalls required 150 stalls proposed Total parking 182 stalls At times of planned events such as farmers market or recreational events the developer would seek temporary permits for parking. In order to attract quality future tenants such as coffee or ice cream, a drive through has been incorporated. r D E S I G N 901 N 3rd St, Suite 120 Minneapolis, MN 55401 tel 612.260.7980 fax 612.260.7990 www.elaniab.com April 10, 2020 Rachel Juba Community Development Director City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Ave N Hugo, MN 55038 Cattle House Restaurant RE: PUD Attributes Dear Rachel: At your request we have reviewed Section 90-141 of the City's Zoning and Land Use regulations and offer the following justification for the use of Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning for the proposed Cattle House Restaurant. Criteria (1) The establishment of PUD zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations, to create or maintain a development pattern that complies with the city's comprehensive plan. Response: The proposed redevelopment of the site is in keeping with the comprehensive plan and the goals of the City's Economic Development Authority (EDA) which has compiled the site over time for the purpose of redevelopment. Criteria (2) The mixing of land uses within a development when such mixing of land uses could not otherwise be accomplished under this chapter. Response: The proposed development provides a blend of uses (restaurant, event center, retail, and public) that rely on shared outdoor spaces and parking. Development under Central Business District (C-1) would require minimum lot dimensions, setbacks and use restrictions that would alter the character of the development. Strict conformance with the Shoreland Overlay District requirements would severely limit development of the property. Criteria (3) Variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in this chapter in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporating design elements (e.g., construction materials, landscaping, lighting, open space, etc.) that exceed the city's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Response: The proposed development integrates walkways, plazas, boardwalks and lake access that affords the public access to Egg Lake that would not otherwise be availed in traditional development. The building architecture will have an industrial barn like feel that draws upon a historical small town palate. A downtown streetscape is created with a combination of minimal setbacks, extensive landscaping and decorative lighting. Site Analysis & Planning I Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services RE: Cattle House Restaurant — PUD Attributes April 10, 2020 Criteria (4) A more creative and efficient approach to land use within the city, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the city. Response: It is the goal of the developer to create a destination where the public gathers as a community for planned seasonal activities focused on the lake and wellness. A dock is proposed to facilitate lake access for peddle boats and canoes. In the winter there may be ice skating and snowmobile races. A farmers market would provide residents with the opportunity to support local agriculture. The high quality restaurant and event center fill an identified need in the community. Criteria (5) Preservation and enhancement of natural features and open spaces, including but not limited to the width expansion of greenway corridors, conservation of wooded areas, development of buffer areas, reduction of impervious surface, and utilization of joint facilities and utilities. Response: In addition to the design elements previously described the site has been engineered to optimize development potential through the use of an innovative stormwater management system that facilitates the infiltration of all runoff through the use of 100% porous pavement. Besides the obvious environmental benefit this allows open space to be used for active and passive recreation rather than stormwater management. The plan avoids direct wetland impacts and preserves mature trees along the shoreline and in the northeast corner of the site. By seamlessly blending the parking facilities for each of the four proposed buildings it is possible to limit the overall number of parking stalls while still providing sufficient parking for large gatherings at the event center and special community events. Criteria (6) Maintenance or improvement for the efficiency of public streets and utilities. Response: The site has been designed to integrate the established intersection at 146t" Street North as its main access. A secondary access to Highway 61 is proposed at the north end of the site. The site utility plan takes advantage of the existing sanitary sewer that bisects the site. The water system offers a needed upgrade to the existing system by looping to provide a redundancy in the system. The site plan provides opportunities to extend the redevelopment to the north and south without the need for additional access points onto the highway. Criteria (7) Establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. Response: The site has been designed with a significant open space buffer to the residential properties to the north east. Landscape screening is provided to the residence immediately to the north while preserving the opportunity for that site to ultimately redevelop in a manner similar to this redevelopment. The business uses to the south of this development are similar in nature and require limited transitions. Page 2 of 3 RE: Cattle House Restaurant — PUD Attributes April 10, 2020 Through the use of a PUD zoning the applicant is requesting the following flexibility from the zoning code: Shoreland Overlay District — Regulation — Recreational Lake Requirement Proposed Variance Requested Minimum Lot Area 25,000 sf 83,653 sf No Minimum Lot Width 100 ft 248 ft No Structure Setback 125 ft Deck 49 ft Building 75 ft Yes Structure Height 25 ft 22 ft No Impervious surfaces within setback 25% 25% No Dock Area 600 sf 1310 sf Yes Dock Length 100 ft 155 ft Yes Dock Width 6 ft 8 ft Yes Central Business (C-1) District — Requirement Proposed Variance Requested Front Yard Building Setback 10 ft loft No Side Yard Building Setback 0 ft loft No Rear Yard Building Setback 30 ft n/a No Parking Setback to ROW 10 ft loft No Parking Setback Side Yard 5 ft 4.33 ft at drop off Yes Landscaping (% of parking area) 5% 4.9% Yes Parking is addressed in the provided project narrative. If you need additional information do not hesitate to contact me or a member of the design team. Sincerely, e%' t Steve Johnston, PE Principal Engineer Cc: Elan File #ARC19010 Tony Harmening Kathy Anderson Page 3 of 3 Model: Chateau 1760LLU Finish: BK (Black) sk — - W��-4 �1{ - { i 1 _ - 1 - 1p �4�r�ra Eclipse Galileo "Aurora" XL3 Dark Bronze 3.25" Wide x 30" Tall x 4" Cultured Stone Veneer Exterior Composite Decking Sierra Premium- Shake Sample rk, Premium- Shake Stained 3laple ena SPrenu48 .SS b4plr ■A-hered char �d ■ - ■ bad. ■ Primed Sena ftm,- tihak, R,1­1 - - Fiber cement pikw-1 craekrotrcdelmiate. Ptad.n er mt 5perifiradan9.1. Ihl 8 keII1Fnonunmx Fiber cement panels withstand extreme weather eoadhions. 186 Al /Imo' YL'eigl, I8 66: per parel/ Shake mailable in primed. prellnished In an, mlor and 116s, MN ft 5`pre-finished stain mlces. (.Nartufxtumd M- N, khark Prnefuns, In". O-rw 6sq- h. pe w d lkpo� C ,ge 51'sq ft-Per pied A ra wamnn•d s . finmh and Ihear—nn" on 1-ir fish} —bp . Fa Cory primed and faavn. Baled on six sides. Mam,f—r d. kzhod 5W PSI p —d- �y Ritter rl greater than 15U mph. sustaulahle winds-ASTN E330, AurcelareJ: Yes 4-d L-- bmikage during Insr:dleunn with thkker 12' panels. wiled: Bh.slds� • lewgr�r pands mean k- c�r¢ing and quicker in -Nation. Finch, �� 3U+'ear rrar aahle limited n.mranr}- . PnkWng � 6 1PAt>ftt ftk % ' 9reMwLLe�7t! 7d lw3ml(Wal NICHIHA - fiber cement ..:,...� Date: Project Name: Color: #381 MONASTERY BROWN Dryvit Texture: QUARZPUTZ Distributed By ... LK: LUTZ COMPANY 8801 Xylon Avenue North Brooklyn Park, MN 53445 763-315-5886 763-315-5891(fax) *This sample is provided for this project only. C tlor formulations are subject to change or be discontinued without notice. Please contact Lu , Company before using this sample for future projects_ The intent and purpose of this sample is to provide 2 basic tepresentation of Dryvit Systems, Inc. finish textures and colors. It is offered as a sales aid only to guide in final color selection. Actual color may vary slightly. The approved sample(s) for each project mist be kept at the jobsite. It is the responsibility of the owner or owner's representative to verify that the act ial finish material provided matches the approved sample odor to finish installation. Texture may appear Slightly different from the sample, depending on the tools and techniques used by the Dryvit contractor on the project. Exterior Synthetic Stucco (EIFS) 146TH STREET NORTH I I 1 I ' 1 � I I ' I I 1 ' I I g32.7 ' 'EX. B RIM g32.1 R EX. CB INV-g27.4-� i 12IM=g32.4 0 / L INV=g27J g32.6 �� 9 g32.4 0 CB Q IIIX=g32.3 INw=g28.1 �- y Q " g33.4 932.7 Zy • Y� I 1 z - x 34.c LOI Ln L 933.5 I r' EX. CB ' T ' PIr1=g33.8 EX. B PIr1= 33,5 F — \V= 2g.2 —� V � /FUTURE BUILD LOCATION 1 1 ; - -_ J m ' FUTUR! � fl 934.1 GJ � RCP (PFK PLAiv) k' aJ o � FUTURE - / �� xg35 2 F�U�E CURB CURB EX. FES i Ii 0 J O 0Z I LU I I � _ / \ ",SW CO2NER OF LOT 2 OF KENNETH N. I ' GPANGE2 ADDITION ---- 20" UTILITY EASEMENT ' ' J PEP- DOC. NO. 324264-v - I o ' 30' UTILITY EASEMENT -- PEP, DOC. NO. 324268___ JLM UTILITY EASEMENT PEP INV=g3I.9 I =g34.8 9�_ _ vX. LOCATION -_ — NV=g2g.7(E) k /� F 30 UTIL �T PE2 p \NA-EPNAIN --- c- '�� °C. SUMP=g2q.4' O �, EX. CB-- Z -E"LY R/W LINE OF ' RIN-934.1 US HWY NO. 61 NVg2g.6 �� m CIO,� r EX. CB-- ��= i v � RIM=g34.3 LO 3 INV=g2g.g ' EXISTING SIGN I L0� 14 ` SIGN TOP= g48.2- F Tu F L2 Xg35.6 19� F 00 ' 4( ? I 9 34,E vo / O cn O S78 °02 24 I P.O.B. 80 110 f�0 �RB D)I'Y _ S89°54'43"W 770.38 _ NO2TH LINE GOV'T LOT 4, SEC. 20, TWP. 31, RN(;. 21 z LLJ w Q - LU Z - I OF V✓ r- n / A / r- —/— / / n / V ILL ♦ r\ n ♦ r- r\ n rl rl / -- \ A / l \l l \l F- l /--1 / /A\ l \ L— I 11 V L— l I I I V \/ \ — 1/ I/ V\/ L— l 1 / I L/ L/ l l l\/ l V --10" UTILITY EASEMENT O PER DOC. NO. 324266 —--------------!--J -Fx_ r1H `--20' UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 324263 6' 97 - � 4.47 / xg30.` I /---W"LY LINE OF LOT 1 i 3 OF KENNETH N. / - g2ga I I �t GRANGER ADDITION q2q w m g27.g ICO CO O oLn B< \ O o 7' oS,IE / �� N� 1°S9'gg / '-__ --64" UTILITY EASEMENT / R NC i PEP DOC. N0. 755836 SU i /- SURVEY LINE LOCATION AS SHOWN ON WSB SURVEY ='_30" UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 324272 UTILITY EASEMENT PE2 DOC. NO. 324274 \\\�------30" UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 324273 --__=--==--30' UTILITY EASEMENT PEP DOC. NO. 324275 --------30' UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 324276 \`--30" UTILITY EASEMENT PEP DOC. NO. 324277 -30" UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 32427q I I I I I �I ------ SURVEY LINE LOCATION AS SHOWN ON WSB SURVEY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOTES: THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM FIELD SURVEY INFORMATION AND EXISTING DRAWINGS. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE. THIS SURVEY HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL LOCATE TICKET NUMBER(S) 193261460. SOME MAPS WERE RECEIVED, WHILE OTHER UTILITIES DID NOT RESPOND TO THE LOCATE REQUEST. ADDITIONAL UTILITIES OF WHICH WE ARE UNAWARE MAY EXIST. LEGEND: FOUND MONUMENT FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION O SET 112" IRON PIPE HYDRANT MARKED RLS NO. 25718 0 CURB STOP v CABLE TV PEDESTAL WATER WELL AC AIR CONDITIONER O WATER MANHOLE OE ELECTRIC MANHOLE wn WATER METER an ELECTRIC METER POST INDICATOR VALVE EP ELECTRIC PEDESTAL WATER VALVE er ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER O BOLLARD L� LIGHT POLE p FLAG POLE GUY WIRE Mg MAIL BOX POWER POLE TRAFFIC SIGN OG GAS MANHOLE O UNKNOWN MANHOLE cn GAS METER SOIL BORING O TELEPHONE MANHOLE X g50.0 SPOT ELEVATION v TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ® TRAFFIC SIGNAL co SANITARY CLEANOUT �o SANITARY MANHOLE CONIFEROUS TREE O or (D CATCH BASIN 0 or ❑ STORM DRAIN DECIDUOUS TREE ® FLARED END SECTION O STORM MANHOLE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND CABLE TV UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD UTILITY UNDERGROUND GAS SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FENCE CURB [TYPICAL] CONTOURS CONCRETE SURFACE leLM DENOTES FOUND JUDICIAL LANDMARK r------1 DENOTES PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT L-----J \ NE COP. GOV"T LOT 4, \\ SEC. 20, TWP. 31, PNG, 21 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of Lots 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 1 1 , 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 all in COUNTY AUDITORS PLAT NO. 7, as is on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota, and that part of Government Lot 4, Section 20, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast Corner of Government Lot 4, Section 20, Township 31, Range 21, Washington County, Minnesota; thence South 89 degrees 54 minutes 43 seconds West, assumed bearing along the north line thereof, 770.38 feet to the easterly Right of Way Line of U.S. Highway No. 61 ; thence South 11 degrees 51 minutes 27 seconds West, along said easterly Right of Way Line, 1150.20 feet to the Southwest Corner of said Lot 1 5; thence South 78 degrees 02 minutes 24 seconds East, 173.48 feet to the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence North 1 1 degrees 51 minutes 27 seconds East, 46.00 feet; thence North 78 degrees 09 minutes 34 seconds West, 173.48 feet to said easterly Right of Way Line; thence North 11 degrees 51 minutes 27 seconds East, along said easterly Right of Way Line, 612.17 feet; thence South 79 degrees 15 minutes 40 seconds East, 145.81 feet to the southerly extension of the westerly line of KENNETH N. GRANGER ADDITION, as is on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota; thence North 1 1 degrees 13 minutes 45 seconds East, along said southerly extension, 61.34 feet to a point distant 50.47 feet southwesterly of the Southwest Corner of Lot 2 said KENNETH N. GRANGER ADDITION; thence North 79 degrees 24 minutes 05 seconds West, 145.15 feet to said easterly Right of Way Line; thence North 1 1 degrees 51 minutes 27 seconds East, along said easterly Right of Way Line, 278.07 feet; thence North 89 degrees 54 minutes 43 seconds East, 209.14 feet to the east line of said Lot 5; thence South 00 degrees 32 minutes 40 seconds West, along said east line, 58.99 feet to the south line of said Lot 5; thence South 89 degrees 54 minutes 42 seconds West, along said south line, 75.38 feet to the Northwest Corner of Lot 1 said KENNETH N. GRANGER ADDITION; thence South 1 1 degrees 13 minutes 45 seconds West, along the westerly line of said KENNETH N. GRANGER ADDITION and it's southerly extension, 244.73 feet to a point distant 50.47 feet southwesterly of the Southwest Corner of said Lot 2; thence South 76 degrees 42 minutes 05 seconds East, 274.47 feet to the westerly line of Lot 3 said KENNETH N. GRANGER ADDITION; thence South 00 degrees 20 minutes 17 seconds West, along said westerly line, 64 feet more or less to the shore line of Egg Lake; thence southwesterly along said shore line, 737 feet more or less to a line which bears South 78 degrees 02 minutes 24 seconds East from the point of beginning; thence North 78 degrees 02 minutes 24 seconds West, 1 10 feet more or less to the point of beginning. EXCEPTING THEREFROM That part of Lots 5, 7, 8, all in COUNTY AUDITORS PLAT NO. 7, as is on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota: described as follows; Commencing at the Northeast Corner of Government Lot 4, Section 20, Township 31, Range 21, Washington County, Minnesota; thence South 89 degrees 54 minutes 43 seconds West, assumed bearing along the north line thereof, 770.38 feet to the easterly Right of Way Line of U.S. Highway No. 61 ; thence South 11 degrees 51 minutes 27 seconds West, along said easterly Right of Way line, 153.32 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing South 11 degrees 51 minutes 27 seconds West, along said easterly right of way line, 278.07 feet; thence South 79 degrees 24 minutes 05 seconds East, 145.15 feet to the southerly extension of the westerly line of KENNETH N. GRANGER ADDITION, as is on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota, point being 50.47 feet southwesterly of the Southwest Corner of Lot 2 said KENNETH N. GRANGER ADDITION; thence North 1 1 degrees 13 minutes 45 seconds East, along said westerly line and its southerly extension, 244.73 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 1 said KENNETH N. GRANGER ADDITION, also being the south line of Lot 5, said AUDITORS PLAT NO. 7; thence North 89 degrees 54 minutes 42 seconds East, along said south line, 75.38 feet, to the east line of said Lot 5; thence North 00 degrees 32 minutes 40 seconds East, along said east line 58.99 feet; thence South 89 degrees 54 minutes 43 seconds West, 209.14 feet to said Easterly right of way line and the point of beginning. (PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PROVIDED BY WSB & ASSOCIATES. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION IS CURRENTLY BEING SPLIT THROUGH AN EXAMINERS DIRECTIVE.) TITLE NOTES: NO TITLE WORK PROVIDED FOR THE BENEFIT OF THIS SKETCH. EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY ARE THE SAME AS THOSE SHOWN ON PREVIOUS SURVEYS OBTAINED FROM WSB AND ASSOCIATES. ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS OF WHICH WE ARE UNAWARE MAY EXIST. EXISTING AREAS: TOTAL AREA = 1 84,61 6 SQ.FT., BEING 4.24 ACRES, MORE OR LESS (AREA MEASURED TO THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER LINE) PROPOSED AREAS: PROPOSED LOT 1 = 83,651 SQ.FT. PROPOSED OUTLOT A = 96,067 SQ.FT. DEDICATED FOREST BLVD NORTH = 4,898 SQ.FT. TOTAL AREA = 1 84,61 6 SQ.FT., BEING 4.24 ACRES, MORE OR LESS (AREA MEASURED TO THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER LINE) OUTLOT NOTE: AT THIS POINT SITE DEVELOPMENT WILL ONLY TAKE PLACE ON THE PROPOSED LOT 1 AND THE REMAINDER OF THE SITE WILL BE PLATTED AS AN OUTLOT. PLANS FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF SAID OUTLOT INCLUDE SEQUENTIAL PLATTING INTO THREE ADDITIONAL LOTS WITH A BUILDING AND IMPROVEMENTS ON EACH FUTURE LOT. THE FUTURE BUILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS ARE SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY FOR REFERENCE AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. SURVEY NOTES: 1. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON COORDINATES SUPPLIED BY THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYORS OFFICE (NAD83). 2. WETLAND DELINEATION LINES PROVIDED BY WSB AND ASSOCIATES AND HAVE NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. VACATING EXISTING EASEMENTS NOTE: IT IS THE INTENDED THAT ALL THE EASEMENTS AFFECTING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY WILL BE VACATED PRIOR TO THE FINAL PLAT BEING RECORDED. NEW UTILITY AND ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL BE RECORDED ONCE THE AS -BUILT LOCATIONS OF UTILITY PIPES AND ACCESS AREAS ARE DETERMINED. NEW DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS WILL BE DEDICATED ON THE FINAL PLAT PENDING CITY ENGINEER COMMENTS. CATTLE HOUSE ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT CONTACT: ELAN DESIGN LAB Steve Johnston 901 N 3 rd Street Suite 120 Minneapolis MN 55401 612-2607982 sjohnston@elanlab.com COUNTY/CITY: WASH 1 NGTON C O U IV TY CITY OF H U G O REVISIONS: DATE REVISION 01-16-20 INITIAL ISSUE 04-03-20 PROPOSED EASEMENTS CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Dani hurmes Registration N tuber: 25718 Date:__ 01-_ 1-6 _20--- PROJECT LOCATION: l 4xxx FOREST BLVD. N. PID#2003121240035 PID#2003121240038 -2003121240049 PID#2003121240053 Suite #200 1970 Northwestern Ave Stillwater, MN 55082 Phone 651.275.8969 Fax 651.275.8976 dan@ cssurvey .net CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC. FILE NAME SURVEDL31 PROJECT NO. EDL1 9031 PRELI M I NARY PLAT -30' UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. N0, 324279 I I � I ] Ln I � RIM=g30.0 OF WATERMAIN--- / I INV-g2q.6(N) o . __/ Xg3o0 __ INV=glB.l �3 SUMP=g2q.4' O US HWY N0. 61 30' UTILI Y EASEMEN , ° 9 _ I(PER PLAN) q3h� EX. CB-- X935.8 PER DO NO. 3242 O___Z l I n Q) / RIM=g34.1 ED E OF TALL 1 I Xq2 .4 II a- WE DS/GRASS-1 I p \ PO ER OLE w z I APPROX. LOCATION l T\ O I - / xg34.2 I a� (N WI ES) v EX. CB-- OF WATERMAIN \ c\ i RIM=934.3 ' (PER PLAN) \ 6 L T 13 xg3z5 a I 3 0 INV=g2q.9 LO 14 Xg31.7 _ _ I EXISTING SIGN ° 0" UTILITY EASEMENT 31.1 I 9 SIGN TOP= 948.2-I9 X „ ; 4 PER DOC. 324281--­7_ _ - /00 - s2 X g35.6 x X g35.4 LOT _ - 0 93, OUND PING ED LOT I i g2q.1 37.2 q3'' +�3h. 1 N PIPE (I. - N "LY OF C RNER)- . q35 �/ 11 I'll i 11I EXISTING 75 Xq 4 kBUILDING 3.48 / X g33.0 8°�3 JLM 0 9 / I g35.b `9 4"� rn3k- LOT 15 Icv 9 LO 16 X _ e 5 �' 1 � x 1 I q3A ^� o R J 6 I r 173.48 ) g a � JL I ���� z 934.6 \� �82 g 2 FOUND I/2 INCH IRON 8 1 30 -- - - 3 / z > ---PORTION OF PARCEL EGAL DESCRIPTIONDNOTRIBED LL_--� LJ..I Q - I (-APPROX. LOCATION LU SHOWN AS PART OF THIS SURVEY-/ 0 z OF WATERMAIN \ Q - (PER PLAN) 1 I I I O_ n l LL K l- - l\ l l\/ F- l l- i l\ l I \\ SW CORNER OF LOT 2 --APPROX. SMH Q ] OF KENNETH N. LOCATION ­10' UTILITY EASEMENT O GRANGER ADDITION ----- _ I �\\ / (PER PLAN) i i PER DOC. N0. 324266 /00 II 20" UTILITY EASEMENT > > > PER DOC. N0. 324264-; - � I 66 FOUND I/ 2 INCH IRON `� `�-�------�-------------%/ � //�IJ - / I � / PIPE MARKED "RLS 13115"-, �� I / / �- EX. SMH / EXISTING / / RIM=g33.8 BUILDING / / INV=q Iq.O(N/W) v I I FOUND 3/4 INCH I \ x 7 INV=gl8.8(SW) v IRON PIPE (4.4" cr - NW'LY OF CORNER / L / I 30' UTILITY EASEMENT i - 93s I PER DOC. N0. 324268g\ / JLM q32 q I �q xg33.7 g33.4 �D // UTILITY EASEMENT PER /' 9 / ` �� DOC. NO. 324265-=�_ I \ W `� �` C� ,�20" UTILITY EASEMENT � IEXISTING' ` z ° I g336/�6'o I X132� / PER DOC. No. 324263 BUILDINGS EXISTING I \ \\ I Id x� EX. SI'1%I �0 4� �cS��/ / xg32.3 v Xg32.6 I\ �r Ctij RIM-q 3.6 �� 12 4& / Xg32.4 9� Jr � „ q\Bo I LDI NG q3�\I } INV=g,20.g 711 rO BASKETBALL l 4� / q32 --1_ Xg33.q HOOP POST 145g33.7 I q33' X Y EXTENSION Xg33.7 IO"C / /k 2/ TNH=g36.75--\ U 28 ou X93 9 OF Y LINE OF 70„ / q31 �" -FOUND I/2 INCH IRON a 7" BL / PIPE MARKED "RLS 13115" I 0 NNE / I L ' g32.7 I ql� 30 934.o� .4- \\II GRANGER DTION ED OF TALL Sty / +� xg3o.5 930 Xg2q.q M 1 /---W'LY LINE OF LOT 93 EX. SMH �I EEDS GRASS ^ i 3 OF KENNETH N. 2.4 22 � I R / / / �° , °/ „� q33RIM=g34.5I 'I93s, l 1 0� 1 � _�q2 � ,~5 GRANGER ADDITION I EX. CB a\� 15' INV=g2l.4I ° I L 4 3° \ xg34. / / �� ��� ^h 0128 °� _ � PIH=g32.1 P 1 �/ 20' UTILI EASEMENT / g2g.l °�_ Wu -- o, w- o I n Xg34.4I II FOUND I/2 INCH \ PER DO N0. 324264 +9 Xg32.4 / i �� `� m INV=g27.4- cl)934.6 IRON PIPE , 00 CO EX. CB / 6 t o, g2zq I RIM=g32.4--APPROX. LOCATION 6 -_ R / 8„ . p INV=g27.1 ° OF TERMAIN ' �1ARKED "RLS6617"- / yg31 ) � Cn W _ (PE PL I� X-206 UTILITY EASEMENT 32"-12" pg / 6� \ \ 4 M I ' PER DOC, NO. 32426 / QX 7 \\ 1 _H Og326 1 X 2� I /I \�``�� Xg343 / / �� \ \,I co = g32.4 L J 0\33 2� `L� 7n I ° Xg34.0 q3 '3 Xg34.5 15" / \\ -EX. FES L ` -; I z �'p ( 3.1 q3Z __ �o? 12" L 1E / I 0 INV=g26.8 I E CLEAN -OUT I to / / 3 z M=g33.2 _ -- xg33.8 xg33.6 / C), + 3 Q� N� °89 98 / \� --64" UTILITY EASEMENT I PER DOC. NO. 755836 > IRT=g24.3 I ` 20' UTILITY EASEMENT /03� A- 0' / UN 1 ( ) PER DOC. NO. 32427 CLI I.5 OST/ - g2q.7 / --EDGE OF ICE MEASURED ON 12-05-Iq sz NO LID ON PIPE q2 7 /SURVEY �. w j xg33.3 0�� I p /A / // ICE ELEVATION = OHWL q3�q EX. CB .� `��I LOT 8 RIH=g32.3 \3 \�0 � -SURVEY LINE LOCATION AS I O I -- y NV-g28.1 SHOWN ON WS6 SURVEY _ LOT g FOUND I/2 IN IRON / +�ZA�/ �0 ` CIP WATERMAIN Xg33.4 l s' PIPE MARK "ANEZ" � P -lQ � � � `\ I (PER PLAN) (1.2" Nw" of S VEY / �� ���a UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOTES: SIN NGLE PO t) / / 2p,/ �Q w� Q��r7QQ / 30' UTILITY EASEMENT �� / / �0 �o �V� i THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM J co Xg34.0 PER DOC. NO. 32427 Xq 4 s, l 0 a� � � � a Q �-��, FIELD SURVEY INFORMATION AND EXISTING DRAWINGS. THE q33 0 ; . „ -- - / / J�a �� 0� �� Q� �a SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND y. Xg33.4 7 Xg33.g \ QQ - Q v� P Q Q- Q '1327 ° 9,34 93 6 0 a� �� ��`� �� ��o UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, \�Q�P FOUND I INCH IRON PIP ��� j/ /o, �' �Q�V� �oQ EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER y- 33+ (1.3' NW'LY of SURVE / �� j �� �� �� ��Q� a� ����� DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN O Ix LINE LINE ANGLE OINT °O Q 2 )- / ^�4' Qo��o�a ?���p ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE DOES 2211 93 EX. SM 20 / \ 3---- CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE I L j o TIy RIM= q.5 / X / -- Q Q) FROM THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE. THIS SURVEY HAS NOT I EX. CB xg34o fig" �`m INV g18.0- '! �/q25� �' �OgQ�a PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. GOPHER g33.z RIM=q32 8 STATE ONE CALL LOCATE TICKET NUMBER(S) 193261460. SOME I INV=g28.6 � OT IO Q MAPS WERE RECEIVED, WHILE OTHER UTILITIES DID NOT RESPOND Xg33.7 Xg32q Xq 2.3 ,'-_ __�- - _-----��� TO THE LOCATE REQUEST. ADDITIONAL UTILITIES OF WHICH WE I Z o ARE UNAWARE MAY EXIST. =-�30' UTILITY EASEMENT I O y 24" I q3o 2 I PER DOC, N0. 324272 ro g34.2 I CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! I ^ _, t I I 934 3 C2 i _ -_ Gopher State One Call I �^ J g33.5 ° � �}_ // 3---------'-- 30" UTILITY EASEMENT (9) TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Ii \ Xg34.0 ^ o I PER DOC. N0. 324274 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 ,-APPROX. LOCATION ° I I -- - V I OF WATERMAIN ti+ �8„ Gov i I ------EDGE OF DELINEATED WETLAND AS I � (PEP, ) PLAN �� W PROVIDED BY WSB AND ASSOCIATES Z y I rP )kg30. IO I g34.2 LOT Io + / xg34.2 LOT II EDG OF TA L i�I _- �� k qj Oy -she p I933.5 Xg33.7 WE S/GRA S EX. CB I/� ,TNH=g37.60 _ ^� z �� I II = ----- I I (C`° LEGEND: I EX. CB + v RIH-g33.5® g34.3 -30' UTILITY EASEMENT FOUND MONUMEN T FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION INV-g2q.2 PER DOC. N0. 324273 - I / LOT I I _ _------- O2 0 SET 1 /2" IRON PIPE F� HYDRANT v MARKED RLS NO. 25718 O CURB STOP LOT 12 --3O" UTILITY EASEMENT ry CABLE TV PEDESTAL WATER WELL �► Xg34.5 I I I I PER DOC. N0. 324275 AC AIR CONDITIONER y Xg33.8 I I O WATER MANHOLE q3 OEELECTRIC MANHOLE \ \ I wM WATER METER X q32. EM T ELECTRIC METER ® POST INDICATOR VALVE EP ELECTRIC PEDESTAL Xg34.5 X930.7 I II � � WATER VALVE I er ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER BOLLARD 93I ,• Xg34.8 I g2q.8 --30' UTILITY EASEMENT �. _ LIGHT POLE p FLAG POLE L T 12 PER DOC. N0. 324276 42 rP - - - GUY WIRE Mg MAIL BOX I I \l 1 N T 3 3 POWER POLE POST--14" POST-oSTRAFFIC SIGN 146TH EX. SMH RIM=g35.0 INV=g15.5 STREET NORTH 934.1 �0 I-5" POST Xg33.4 X 32.5 , 6 a 9� I ��� � `--30" UTILITY EASEMENT x6 - - - - - - - - _ _ `, - EX. SMH - - +_ j I W 6 PER DOC. N0. 324277 90 I pJ RIM=g31.0 1 \v A 3 xg3ssINV=glB.q < < m C g35.IX J\ INV=q17. NE/W) I I I ° to 15"RCP (PER PLAN) k I a\) o EX. SMH i i i d c^ Xg352 RIM=g35.4 \� /S S N.jPIpE \` Xg33.6 / h rn INV=g16.2 �PE of I v PLAN) P VI Imo.` a' -- - - - - - - - - - r -- n ° Xg35.5 11 I \ 89 I 1 EX, FES E STMH n� 40' UTILITY EASEMENT xg35.7 NV-g31.q I IM=g34.8 9� q3 PER DOC. NO. 324278 -`== xq3 INV=g2q.7(E) x - r I \ I APPROX. LOCATION _ �-E'LY R/W LINE OF 932 0 _ W � w yw Lu ------- SURVEY LINE LOCATION AS SHOWN ON WSB SURVEY Q I- C) W _Q � � U z� o oQz° Q C.0 Cw5 II I PIPE (LAYED OVER)--- ! p,0,g 0,9' ° 9 __--APPROX. SMH 3m 05 ' DES ,24" k LOCATION g33.5 I I I X034.8 CR/BE0 I (PER PLAN) / g32.0 X 31.8 OG GAS MANHOLE @ UNKNOWN MANHOLE GM GAS METER a SOIL BORING O TELEPHONE MANHOLE X g50.O SPOT ELEVATION rc TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ® TRAFFIC SIGNAL co SANITARY CLEANOUT SANITARY MANHOLE CONIFEROUS TREE ® or O CATCH BASIN ® or ❑ STORM DRAIN DECIDUOUS TREE ® FLARED END SECTION O STORM MANHOLE uE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC ury UNDERGROUND CABLE TV uF UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC ur UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE ou OVERHEAD UTILITY uc UNDERGROUND GAS > SANITARY SEWER >> STORM SEWER WATERMAIN x FENCE CURB [TYPICAL] 1230 CONTOURS BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE QJLM DENOTES FOUND JUDICIAL LANDMARK 0 ILU Q VJOLU Ii _j U Z I LUZi^> J J ILL 0 O Q U N } _ OZ>� o�< 0�V)z w ~ O 1­-0 Z N LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE FOLLOWING LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AS SHOWN ON SURVEY PRODUCED BY WSB AND ASSOCIATES. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY BEING REGISTERED AND THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE. That part of Lots 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 all in COUNTY AUDITORS PLAT NO. 7, as is on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast Corner of Government Lot 4, Section 20, Township 31, Range 21, Washington County, Minnesota; thence South 89 degrees 54 minutes 43 seconds West, assumed bearing along the north line thereof, 770.38 feet to the easterly Right of Way Line of U.S. Highway No. 61 ; thence South 1 1 degrees 51 minutes 27 seconds West, along said easterly Right of Way Line, 1 1 50.20 feet to the Southwest Corner of said Lot 1 5; thence South 78 degrees 02 minutes 24 seconds East, 173.48 feet to the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence North 1 1 degrees 51 minutes 27 seconds East, 46.00 feet; thence North 78 degrees 09 minutes 34 seconds West, 173.48 feet to said easterly Right of Way Line; thence North 11 degrees 51 minutes 27 seconds East, along said easterly Right of Way Line, 61 2.1 7 feet; thence South 79 degrees 15 minutes 40 seconds East, 145.81 feet to the southerly extension of the westerly line of KENNETH N. GRANGER ADDITION, as is on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota; thence North 1 1 degrees 13 minutes 45 seconds East, along said southerly extension, 61.34 feet to a point distant 52.40 feet southwesterly of the Southwest Corner of Lot 2 said VPKInIGTIA AI rRAAIrGR AnnlTlnnl- thence South 76 degrees 42 minutes 05 seconds East, 274.47 feet to the westerly line of Lot 3 said KENNETH N. GRANGER ADDITION; thence South 00 degrees 20 minutes 17 seconds West, along said westerly line, 64 feet more or less to the shore line of Egg Lake; thence southwesterly along said shore line, 737 feet more or less to a line which bears South 78 degrees 02 minutes 24 seconds East from the point of beginning; thence North 78 degrees 02 minutes 24 seconds West, 1 10 feet more or less to the point of beginning. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SURVEY ONLY A PORTION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS SHOWN GRAPHICALLY. TITLE NOTES: NO TITLE WORK PROVIDED FOR THE BENEFIT OF THIS SKETCH. EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY ARE THE SAME AS THOSE SHOWN ON PREVIOUS SURVEYS OBTAINED FROM WSB AND ASSOCIATES. ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS OF WHICH WE ARE UNAWARE MAY EXIST. SURVEY NOTES: 1. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON COORDINATES SUPPLIED BY THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYORS OFFICE (NAD83). 2. WETLAND DELINEATION LINES PROVIDED BY WSB AND ASSOCIATES AND HAVE NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. CATTLE HOUSE H UGO, MN CONTACT: ELAN DESIGN LAB Steve Johnston 901 N 3rd Street Suite 120 Minneapolis MN 55401 612-2607982 sjohnston@elanlab.com COUNTY/CITY: WASH 1 NGTON C O U IV TY CITY OF H U G O REVISIONS: DATE REVISION 07-09-1 9 PRELIMINARY ISSUE 12-12-19 INITIAL ISSUE 04-03-20 NORTH DRIVEWAY CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Dani hurmes Registration N mber: 25718 Date:_-1 2 =12 _1 9--- PROJECT LOCATION: 1 4 XXX FOREST BLVD. N. PID#2003121240035 PID#2003121240038 -2003121240049 PID#2003121240053 Suite #200 1970 Northwestern Ave Stillwater, MN 55082 Phone 651.275.8969 Fax 651.275.8976 dan@ cssurvey .net CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC. FILE NAME SURVEDL31 PROJECT NO. EDL19031 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY =-i — — m rn ANC z 0/veo o BURL/iyG/GN -__ W p 1 NCT N COUNTy THERN RGADJ REGIONAL US HIGHWAY N p, 61 = _ - — - - RAI �R�A p AU7-H0 _ RITY Ir'0� SMM VICINITY MAP LOCATION MAP fir`• vtams I� II RETAIL / l RETAIL l RESTAURANT I \ 1 I EGG LAKE OHW=926.62(NAVD88) IV\J I I V JL. h1 LL PROJECT CONTACTS FUTURE EVENT k CENTER FUTURE DECK CATTLE HOUSE LLC TONY HARMENING OWNER 18100 FOREST BLVD FOREST LAKE, MN 55025 T (218) 349-4673 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM KATHY ANDERSON ARCHITECT 901 N 3RD STREET SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 5501 T (612) 436-4030 ELAN DESIGN LAB, INC. STEVE JOHNSTON, PE CIVIL ENGINEER 901 N 3rd STREET SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 T (612) 260-7982 LANDSCAPE ELAN DESIGN LAB, INC. PILAR SARAITHONG, RLA ARCHITECT 901 N 3rd STREET SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 T (612) 260-7982 CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC. DAN THURMES, LS LAND SURVEYOR 6750 STILLWATER BLVD. N. SUITE 1 STILLWATER, MN 55082 T (651) 275-8969 COMMUNITY CITY OF HUGO RACHEL JUBA DEVELOPMENT 14669 FITZGERALD AVENUE N CITY PLANNER HUGO, MN 55038 T (651) 762-6304 CITY OF HUGO MARK ERICHSON, PE PUBLIC WORKS 6900 137TH STREET N CITY ENGINEER HUGO, MN 55038 T (651) 286 8463 CATTLE HOUSE RESTAURANT NOT TO SCALE SHEET INDEX C-000 COVER SHEET C-001 PRELIMINARY PLAT BY CORNERSTONE C-010 OVERALL DEMOLITION PLAN C-101 OVERALL SITE PLAN C-102 PHASE I SITE PLAN C-201 OVERALL GRADING PLAN C-202 PHASE I GRADING PLAN C-203 SWPPP C-204 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C-301 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN C-501 DETAILS C-502 DETAILS C-503 DETAILS C-504 DETAILS C-505 DETAILS L-101 OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN L-102 PHASE I LANDSCAPE PLAN L-501 LANDSCAPE DETAILS E-101 PHOTOMETRICS PLAN & EVENT CENTER HUGO - MINNESOTA PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)J, ARY PLAAT, SITE N REVIEW JANUARY 17., 2020 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-436-4030 PROJECT CATTLE HOUSE RESTAURANT & EVENT CENTER HUGO, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN REVIEW 01/17/2020 ISSUE DATE AMENDED CITY APPLICATION 02/20/2020 CITY COMMENTS 03/02/2020 CITY COMMENTS 1 04/10/2020 D E S I G N Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 www.eIanIab.com f 612.260.7990 No lvCj\o NS�� GD SHEET COVER SHEET C-000 PROJECT NO. ARC19010 7v � -, M al / � 00n STMH\z /� PTO RIM-9 CB - �/�/ NV 929.7(E) �� - >> EX. WAS RIM= RIM=933.8 NV-929.6=929.6(N) g ��--- - TON SUMP- PROTECT STORM SEWER - _ - / Q EXISTING SIGN �. - _ _ _ - _ 0(JN% SIGN TOP- 948.2 I EX. C z�� PROTECT OVERHEAD POWER LINE - = / RIM=934.3 `�� REC INV-929.9 ,- --- --- i_ �_ _ = � - _ Nq - ---� PROTECT WATERMAIN s$ �� PROTECT CURB Cly - =3 R Oq --- Y • __°.- - 8"R &GUTTER r A NO - - C \ - - ='� _ T HORS ry ou EX °u >> TING STRIP EX. CB �� _ ❑u - -----------�.-e�----=-------------------- - DHASNOT IE\�BAS ON AERIAL = RIM=932.4 N B R N Z \ --- ° ,�� RIM=933.5 ONFI MED PHOTO _ __ INV=927.1 � --� --_ 2 I T FIELD � REMOVE CONCRETE - w- $'_ - - _ _ OVERHEAD co WALK ------ - ' ' EX CB UTILITY REMOVE REPLACE Z APPROX. LOCATION -° - - = - - _ _ _ E STORM CASTING - c OF WATERMAIN PROTECT SANITARY - RIM=932.8 SEE SHEET C 301 Wi (PER PLAN) MANHOLE - _ - \�� _ _ _ _ _-----8.6-----___ ,,------_ -- - _------ --- - - - EX. S H` - -_ _ --___ --------- RIM=95.4 �W`_ EX. CB INV=916.2 �W °- ° °u --' - RIM- I N V- 9313 PROTECT GAS EX. CB \ RM 932 1 PROTECT HYDRANT _ - W - _ _ _ _ =927.4 I SB-\ ` _ 4 - - _ PROTECT POWER POL & GUTTER URB RELOCATE HYDRANT RELOCATE SIGNAGE PROTECT STORM - RELOCATE POWER POLE / PROTECT CURB - - W- U_ � REMOVE POST CATCHBASIN _ -- -_ ��ll IITTTT / I� RRCONCRETE ' - -- °u G _ - ______ WALK RMAIN - w ' 8I E �8" % „ CP WAT - - ou REMOVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY PROTECT WATERMAIN 20' / \ R PLAN) COORDINATE WITH HOME OWNER /\ gg_g r / r I � TO REPLACE NEW DRIVE CONNECTING FROM NORTH CURB \ / 2 REMOVE CONCRETE 2 / LINE SB-1---------- - p WALK fps" PROTECT SANITARY SEWER0-15#' TWIN / i i SB-14 10' --- jl REMOVE TELEPHONE ® / 18"QUAD I I PEDESTAL -_ REMOVE TELEPHONE - - -4 iSB- PEDESTAL *SB-7 REMOVE TELEPHONE B-15 10' - �OVE SANITARY SEWER TO �711 SB-5 REMOVE TELEPHONE��PEDESTAL EX. CLEAN OUTPEDESTAL -_--/Co RIM=933.2 PROPERTY LINE \/ SB-2--------��---- EX. SMH 1 --___- ------ �, DIRT=924.3 - r� o RIM=931.0 � REMOVE SANITARY MANHOLE I o c M o m _ / (NO LID ON PIPE) o o N V918.9(SE) a �� REMOVE SANITARY REMOVE TELEPHONE ,- o INV-917.3(NE/W) F-, / 0 o m lg• CLEANOUT � PEDESTAL � co zo m o SB=3--------'' o / 24"DBL - --_- SMH Ci o r E D / 71 PROTECT SANITARY,$EWER------__ - REMOVE SANITARY RI = 21.4 > -------_ I -92L4 v PROTECT SANITARY ' ----'- D---_- - SEWER Z Z r' z N MANHOLE < ' - / ` �L v� <it M 0z viv i _�RIM=929.5----- SB 1710 �o_---- ----- _ PROTECT SANIT R\ NV=98.0 SB-10c I - z m < 24r D ' 20 --MANHOLE v RDE/v Om -- wL �'i� w� _ wL� \ POWER POE E N) \ < _ `\ \ P PIPE PROTECT SAN ItARY i o m \� ----_ - {W\ WIRES SB-8i </_ ` MANHOLE ` SB-1'12D'i _ �` z � li i _/ J / PROTECT SANITARY -II APPROX, SMH wL� ` 13"DBL9v / �' MANHOLE / LOCATION ` 4< - / �� (PER PLAN) y - -y I ------ w � ----- V� - ' �. \ N rm --- EX. SMH i EDGE OF DELINEATED \ /ssq . ` Jo o RIM-933.6 WETLAND AS wL\ ?�/ / %wL < �\ V\`. \ \ INV=920.9 t > PROVIDED BY WSB c / AND ASSOCIATES REMOVE POWER POLE Ex SMH v - � �� �� �. � �� � z � RIM-91 r- / \ o NV-918. N. \Cn HWL 928.5 ���"1 �� `� �� 4'DBL -- ` PROTECT SANITARY SEWER 7 EGG 0 ' F_0 OHW=926.62(NAVD88) SB 1220' DEMOLITION NOTES EDGE OF DELINEATED L \24" 5°15"`� p ` ` WETLAND AS WIL \� �� �� �` 70' 6" PROVIDED BY WSB ' wL \\ V vv v\ Av ` 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY TAKEN FROM SURVEY PERFORMED BY AND ASSOCIATES } 24` w� \� \ 24" co X CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC., ON DECEMBER 12, 2019 EXPRESSLY FOR THIS PROJECT. ELAN I �� r \� 8 DESIGN LAB CANNOT GUARANTY THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THIS INFORMATION. VERIFY ALL \\ \ �� REMOVE BASKETBALL on o Cn _ 0 0 f - FIELD CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY 0 \L� �� v �\ _ __ 32"-12" DBL HOOP POST EDGE OF ICE MEASURED ON _ - DISCREPANCIES OR UNKNOWN UTILITIES ARE FOUND THAT IMPACT DESIGN OR IMPAIR CONSTRUCTION, THE \ ��if ENGINEER AND OWNER SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED. 12-05-19 i `. \ EDGE OF TALL v' ICE ELEVATION = ASSUMED OHWL ��`� ����`� AEDS�GRASS ��� o 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BRING ANY CHANGED OR UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS THAT COULD RESULT IN FOUND FADED WETLAND --' I I \ �. \ 4"TIP R\ r \ 7"DBL PROTECT TREES ADDITIONAL COST TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND ENGINEER AS SOON AS THEY ARE DISCOVERED DELINEATION FLAG \` \, \ \-- (TYP) z < SO THAT THEY CAN BE PROPERLY DOCUMENTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OR COVERING UN -WITNESSED WORK (TYP.) \ \ \`� J 10"CL`L�M o D SHALL RESULT IN REJECTION OF CLAIMS FOR ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. `� \ w m �\ N K 8 m 3. PROTECT ALL STRUCTURES AND LANDSCAPE NOT LABELED FOR DEMOLITION FROM DAMAGE DURING V 1 �1° D 7 CONSTRUCTION. ANY ON -SITE OR OFF -SITE AREAS DISTURBED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY DUE TO ` \ PROTECT TREES � � � � \ � p REMOVE VEGETATION CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RETURNED TO A CONDITION EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN THE EXISTING (TYP) CONDITION. CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CIVIL PENALTIES RESULTING FROM THEIR 1\7 \ \ WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT. 4,4 4. NO DEMOLITION MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF ON -SITE. ALL DEBRIS SHALL BE HAULED OFF -SITE TO A V L DISPOSAL AREA APPROVED BY APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES FOR THE HANDLING OF DEMOLITION DEBRIS. WORK SITE SHALL BE LEFT IN A CONDITION THAT MINIMIZES EROSION POTENTIAL ON A NIGHTLY BASE. \ 5. LIMIT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. IF WORK NEEDS TO EXTEND TO PUBLIC STREETS OR RIGHT OF WAY IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO APPLY FOR ALL PERMITS, PREPARE ALL DRAWING AND PAY ALL FEES AND COST. ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL COMPLY WITH LOCAL ORDINANCES. \ \ r EDGE OF DELINEATED \ 6. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF DEMOLITION OPERATIONS. WETLAND AS SEE SHEET C-202 AND C-201 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND APPROPRIATE STAGING AND LEGEND PROVIDED BY WSB I SEQUENCING. AND ASSOCIATES \ / I EX. SMH 7. PROVIDE NECESSARY BARRICADES, SUFFICIENT LIGHTS, SIGNS AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL METHODS \ RIM-933.8 AS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR THE PROTECTION AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC AND MAINTAIN THROUGHOUT ,'. REMOVE CONCRETE i / INV-919.0(N/W) THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT. 1 _ __ I I� � i � I I INV918.8( S(SW) 8. REMOVE ALL EXISTING SURFACE SITE FEATURES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO CONCRETE APRON, SITE REMOVE CURB & GUTTER ,/ LIGHTING AND RELATED FOUNDATIONS, SIGNAGE AND RELATED FOUNDATIONS, AND LANDSCAPING WITHIN / THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. X REMOVE STORM SEWER \ I I I 9. RELOCATION OF UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES. ELECTRIC y HANDHOLES, PULLBOXES, POWERPOLES, GUYLINES, AND STRUCTURES DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION I ACTIVITIES TO BE RESTORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFIC OWNER REQUIREMENTS AT CONTRACTORS � -P L EXPENSE. o­1 a OVERALL DEMOLITION PLAN Z z om 1" = 30' J > Know what's below. � � Call before you dig. 00m w z OAK STREET 30 CC] SCALE IN FEET ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-436-4030 PROJECT CATTLE HOUSE RESTAURANT & EVENT CENTER HUGO, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN REVIEW oz/17/2020 ISSUE DATE AMENDED CITY APPLICATION 02/20/2020 CITY COMMENTS 03/02/2020 CITY COMMENTS 1 04/10/2020 D E S I G N Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 www.eIanIab.com f 612.260.7990 C E R T I F I C A T 1 0 N I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professio eer under the laws of the statey,Qf�ll A. 0si4 ONS� C Stephen M. Johnston DATE REGISTRATION NO. 18914 01/17/2020 SHEET OVERALL DEMOLITION PLAN C-01 0 PROJECT NO. ARC19010 �P PARKING SE m CY) z= /-PARALLEL PEDESTRIAN RAMP EXISTING PEDESTRIAN RAMP OBE t=--_===___- CTON COV NTY REGION HIC -- _=- RAILR r HwAY NO. - O US qp 6 I A v � THORIT �. Y Z TBACK � r 8' NE O V RIGHT OF WAY 80 W / 18, lot chi I 24' / 18, / I 9.3' ° 12' PYLO� SIGN _ 2 r - �zl 6.67' DRIVE THRU — o 16' WINDOW ° 10'BUILDINGS 3 ' v, ETB �I l F F / F-F 16' RETAIL e ' 80' ACK 2,500 +l- SF. °� I ° ° 20'DRAINAGE& UTILITY EASEMENT TRASH ° ° / / ° 20' RETAIL FUTURE DRIVEWAY Y / ENCLOSURE / / ° ° ° °°/ o CONNECTION I / ° 38, U/' OUTDOOR 4,000 +/- SF. Q O ° ° I SEATING AREA U ° f° ° C I 7yp 8' g / TRASH / 0 ° ° WALK CONSTRUCTED IN .i�*� , o / "' �►' / ENCLOSURE / ° PHASE II 6° _ I 125' SHORELINE SETBACK FUTURE WALKWAY ° 99' j, N I 8' 8 CONNECTION I /Q / T' yP/ L� 1 r— 10, BIKE RACKS _ FF � \ ISLANDS I _ J RETAIL / 11' 6 4'5\ CONSTRUCTED -ITV_ I PHASE II FUTURE WALKWAY 3,600 +�- SF. / / � / ° I -I-_ CONNECTION / 30, / 30' DRAINAGE & ° / UTILITY EASEMENT P2 BIKE RACKS 30' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT SEE ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN FOR STREETSCAPE LIGHTING o 8' NEW RIGHT - I OF_WAY 10' PARKING ° '' 21 SETBACK 24' T20' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 0 D4 34 _ 125' SHORELINE SETBACK 24' e 18, -� 1 NOTE: PROPOSED RE -STRIPING SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL FIELD WORK AND MNDOT LEVEL 2 LAYOUT REVIEW PROCESS PERPENDICULAR PEDESTRIAN RAMP ti5 CO PARALLEL PEDESTRIAN RAMP o 24' 8' FF i -o N �9, , I_ p/ 80 a 80 I wj o �I m _ Q \ _hz I r LIGHT POLE � y ° ° \ ' x Qj CONSTRUCTED IN ' PHASE II BIKE RACKS ` \ RESTAURANT ° \\ ® 6 5,700 SF. \ 5' GARDEN POND EASEMENT \ ' ° o_ — SETBACK w w� / w< � \ � \ - ® \`\ � TRASH wL �� �\ \ \ _ \ � \ • ° ENCLOSURE / \ \ \\ FUTURE EVENT 3 / CENTER POTENTIAL FUTURE DRIVEWAY CONNECTION \\�� 3,985 SF. EGG LAKE r \ \ \ �` POND EASEMENT \� \ \ \ EASEMENTDRAINAGE & UTILITY OHW=926.62(NAVD88) v\ NORTH > �> _ INFILTRATION wL wL v� BASIN \ ` Wl C �` �� �� / / � CD F9 WOOD BOARDWALK FIRE PIT SITE PLAN NOTES SEASONAL DOCK UNDER DECK INFILTRATION BASIN/F- 1. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE TO FACE OF CURB AND EXTERIOR = = - _ _ FOR FLAT ROOFED EDGE OF OPEN WATER FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. _ _ PORTION OF BUILDING PROJECT SUMMARY = 10' PUBLIC TRAIL EASEMENT �� \ NO HARD SURFACED TRAIL TO BE CONSTRUCTED ADJUSTED TO RESTAURANT. SETBACK SUMMARY TRAIL CONSTRUCTION TO NORTH BY BOCCE BALL \ PARKING SUMMARY �� OTHERS IN FUTURE \ \�`��/ \ / COURTS ZONED C-1 CENTRAL BUSINESS REQUIRED PROPOSED N. 4-1 REQUIRED PROPOSED �\ DRAINAGE & UTILITY / \ FRONT YARD BUILDING SETBACK 10, 10, �\ EASEMENT \ / DRAINAGE &UTILITY SIDE YARD BUILDING SETBACK 0 10, RETAIL 40.4 STALLS 51 STALLS \\ \ \\ \<- REAR YARD BUILDING SETBACK 30' N/A RESTAURANT 66.6 STALLS 50 STALLS (69 STALLS IN PHASE I) \ \\ \ � \ EASEMENT \ RIGHT-OF-WAY PARKING SETBACK 10' 10' EVENT CENTER 200 SEATS 133.3 STALLS 150 STALLS \ \\\ \ \ / 10' TRAIL EASEMENT PROPERTY PARKING SETBACK 5' 4.33' AT DROP OFF \\\ \ w \ TOTAL PARKING 182 STALLS \\\\\\ HWL 928.5 AREA SUMMARY (MEASURED TO OHWL) 6 - 8'X18' ACCESSIBLE STALLS \\\ EDGE OF DELINEATED WETLAND \ / 176 - 9'X18' STANDARD STALLS \\\ PROPERTY AREA 184,616 SF. (4.24 AC.) \\�\ EDGE OF ICE MEASURED ON 12-05-19 \ n ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY 4,898 SF. PROPOSED BICYCLE 10 BIKE RACKS - 20 SPACES \ ICE ELEVATION - ASSUMED OHWL PROJECT AREA 179,718 SF. (4.13 AC) \\ LAND USE EXISTING AREA OUTSIDE SHORELINE SETBACK WITHIN SHORELINE SETBACK TOTAL PROPOSED BUILDING 0 SF (0%) 7,863 SF (10%) 7,937 SF (8%) 15,800 SF (9%) FUTURE BUILDING 0 SF (0%) 77 SF (0%) 3,908 SF (4%) 3,985 SF (2%) \\ PAVEMENT (WALK/ DRIVE/ PARKING) 0 SF (0%) 12,087 SF (15%) 13,055 SF (13%) 25,142 SF (14%) TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 0 SF (0%) 20 027 SF (25%) 24 900 SF (25%) 44 927 SF (25%) \\� � / I PAVEMENT 0 SF (0%) 44,209 SF. (54%) 24,646 SF (25%) 68,855 SF (38%) \\POROUS PERVIOUS TOTAL PARKING LOT AREA TOTAL LANDSCAPED INTERIOR 179,718 SF (100%) 16,805 SF (21%) 49,131 SF (50%) 65,936 SF (37%) 179,718 SF (100%) 81,041 SF (100%) 98,677 SF (100%) 179,718 SF (100%) 71,752 SF. 3,508 SF. (4.9%) LEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK/ PAVEMENT PERVIOUS AREA WOOD BOARDWALK/ DECK PLAY SURFACE \\\ / \\\ \\\ (REQUIRED 5% MIN., 100 SF. MIN AREA) \\\ OVERALL SITE PLAN ill =30' • Know wha 's below. Cal before you dig. OAK STREET 30 0 SCALE IN FE T ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-436-4030 PROJECT CATTLE HOUSE RESTAURANT & EVENT CENTER HUGO, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN REVIEW 02/17/2020 ISSUE DATE AMENDED CITY APPLICATION 02/20/2020 CITY COMMENTS 03/02/2020 CITY COMMENTS 1 04/10/2020 D E S I G N Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 www.eIanIab.com f 612.260.7990 C E R T I F I C A T 1 0 N I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Profess io eer under the laws of the state�f�ll A. `per` ONS' G Stephen M. Johnston DATE REGISTRATION NO. 18914 01/17/2020 SHEET OVERALL SITE PLAN C-1 01 PROJECT NO. ARC19010 — I I 4' CURB 2 10'PARKING SETBACK I OPENING C-501 671 I I 1 EDGE OF BITUMINOUS IN PHASE I a I CURB/ WALK CONSTRUCTION IN PHASE II I L WHEEL STOP 12 ~ (TYP) C-501 18, 8' — _ LIGHTING (TYP) F.F _ R1O _ \SyDRFl7iyF — _ C-502 o N POROUS-PAVE-MENT & UTILITY IAl SECTION (TYP) — _ _ EASEMENT PHASEI TEMPORARY '--__ ��o PARKING \ o TO- R3.67 ° � ° e o 24' C-0 ° Q PERPENDICULAR PEDESTRIAN RAMP B612 CURB & GUTTER 8 COMMERCIAL CONCRETE (TYP) C-501 DRIVEWAY IS TING RAIL SECTION 5 � NGPRO.ERTYLINE (TYP) C-502 s NEW RIGHT o OF_WAY LINE PARALLEL LRESIDENTIAL 10'BUILDING ° o PEDESTRIAN RAMP DRIVEWAY SETBACK STOP SIGN CONNECTION FROM ° CURB LINE N 9, 9, TYP 1 TYP ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP (TYP) LIGHTI G (TYP) 1 C-50 ' 1 \&> POR US — _ P VEMEN SECTIO — — LI HTING ( YP) ° 6 — _ BIKE RACK (TYP) 6.67_ r 4 INTEGRAL CURB 9 SIDEWALK JOINT ° C-501 AND WALK (1"Yfl C 502 �Y) ° \ \ ACCESSIBLL \ , 15 Cl?M CURB RAMP (TYP -'-- ^ p WOOD RAMP ° \ CONCRETE SIDEWALK 4 -' — — PAVEMENT ° 7 ACCESSIBLE ° \ ° R10' \ o' _ — C-502 TY N TI SECO(P) --9'--- C 501 CURB RAMP (TYP) \ \ ° — _ _ _ 4. ° 1 RESTAURANT \ c \ _ 30' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT M CONCRETE WALK---' � w UNDER DECK INFILTRATION BASIN ' RIBBON CU`RB TEMPORARY VERTICAL �b PLANTING ALONG WALL r r �•• _ SEE LANDSCAPE �„♦' A WOOD STAIR \e \ tk9 it 3-6" RISERS \ `' TARLABLE HEIGHT♦� WOOD DECK \� INTEGRALCURB ♦+-_ \ RAIN GUARDIAN 10 / WL \ FOXHOLE wL \ wL C 502 - WL BOARDWALK 11 \ (TYP) C-501 END PERMANENT / BOARDWALK AT OHWL 7YP R.6CO \ ° B612 CURB ,s C-501 & GUTTER (TYP) 5,700 SF. . 6 ° ACCESSIBLE �s C-501 SIGNAGE (TYP) DROP OFF SPACES 0 \ CURB TRA%ITION _ _ TPOND EASEMENT L FROM 1302 TO _� \4 \ \ ° Tt \\ \ \ SEASONAL DOCK 10' WIDE WOOD \ BOARDWALK LVL wL FIRE PIT 10 C-501 ACTIVE LAWN EDGE OF OPEN WATER PHASE I SITE PLAN WL EXISTING TREES EDGE OF DELINEATED - WETLAND 10' PUBLIC TRAIL EASEMENT - NO HARD SURFACED TRAIL TO BE CONSTRUCTED ADJUSTED TO RESTAURANT. TRAIL CONSTRUCTION TO NORTH BY OTHERS IN FUTURE EDGE OF ICE MEASURED ON 12-05-19 ICE ELEVATION = ASSUMED OHWL III T1��8.16� _ 24 " MONUMENT SIGN i 3 BITUMINOUS C 502 PAVEMENT SECTION _I CD CD I � j 1 � � I CO 1 1 QI „'ml m POTENTIAL FUTURE C I GO COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY z CONNECTION �1 m� z z R50' m 1 � I 2 CONCRETE I C-502 PAVEMENT SECTION 5' Gq RDEN Rao, 7 CONCRETE C-502 PAVEMENT JOINT I (TYP) PARKING SE ° ° o ETBACK CURB TRANSITION 5 / \\ 12'X 26' TRASH & FROM B612 TO RIBBON C-501 ° ° RECYCLING CURB TYP o \� ° ENCLOSURE RIBBON CURB \ / C-501 \ 33' ♦ \\ FUTURE EVENT L \ \ Y DRAINAGE & UTILIT EAS CENTER \ v� 3 985 SF. FUTURE �a@ FUTURE WALK \ \ _ �\ \ �� \\ EXISTING TREES \ \ \ \ D E K �POND EASEMENT I \ / 453' / NORTH INFILTRATION / BASIN FUTURE WOOD \�®®` .% /� \ \ \ STAIR /i 414 Ro 4f co 41 41 wt \ BOCCE BALL 9 C-501 COURT (TYP) WL 928.5 \ \ < \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 EXISTING TREES \ \ \ & VEGETATION \ DRAINAGE & UTILITY \ a EASEMENT 10' TRAIL EASEMENT TRASH & RECYCLING TRUCK CIRCULATION 1"=50' SITE PLAN NOTES 1. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE TO FACE OF CURB AND EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. MEET AND MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS. PROVIDE PROPER TRANSITION AS NECESSARY. 3. ON -SITE CURB TO BE B612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER UNLESS NOTED. 4. ALL CURBS TO HAVE 3/4" EXPANSION JOINTS AT A MAXIMUM OF 100'-0" AND CONTROL JOINTS AT A MAXIMUM OF 10'-0". 5. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE PAINTED WITH A 4" WIDE WHITE STRIPING. ACCESSIBLE SYMBOLS TO BE PAINTED IN WHITE AND ACCESSIBILITY ACCESS AISLES TO BE PAINTED WITH A 4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED STRIPE 18 INCHES ON CENTER AND AT 45 DEGREE ANGLE TO STALL, WITH NO PARKING' MARKED NEAR THE DRIVE AISLE. REFLECTORIZED PAINT SHALL COMPLY WITH MNDOT 3592. PHASE I SUMMARY AREA SUMMARY LOT 1 83,653 SF LAND USE EXISTING AREA BUILDING 0 SF (0%) FUTURE EVENT CENTER 0 SF (0%) PAVEMENT (WALK/ DRIVE/ PARKING) 0 SF (0%) TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 0 SF (0%) POROUS PAVEMENT PERVIOUS 83,653 SF (100%) TOTAL 83.653 SF (100%) PARKING SUMMARY REQUIRED RESTAURANT = 66.6 STALLS PROPOSED 69STALLS 4 - 8'X18' ACCESSIBLE STALLS 65 - 9'X18' STANDARD STALLS PROPOSED BICYCLE 3 BIKE RACKS - 6 SPACES LEGEND PHASE OUTSIDE SHORELINE SETBACK 1,425 SF (4%) 77 SF (0%) 3,598 SF (9%) 5,100 SF (13%) 24,548 SF (64%) 8,588 SF (23%) 38,236 SF (100%) CONCRETE SIDEWALK/ PAVEMENT WOOD BOARDWALK/ DECK POROUS PAVEMENT PERVIOUS AREA PLAY SURFACE PHASE WITHIN SHORELINE SETBACK 4,275 SF (9%) 3,908 SF (9%) 8,211 SF (18%) 16,394 SF (36%) 4,490 SF (10%) 24,533 SF (54%) 45,417 SF (100%) TOTAL PHASE 5,700 SF (7%) 3,985 SF (5%) 11,809 SF (14%) 21,494 SF (26%) 29,038 SF (35%) 33,121 SF (39%) 83,653 SF (100%) Know what's below. CaII before you dig. 20 60 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-436-4030 PROJECT CATTLE HOUSE RESTAURANT & EVENT CENTER HUGO, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN REVIEW 02/17/2020 ISSUE DATE AMENDED CITY APPLICATION 02/20/2020 CITY COMMENTS 03/02/2020 CITY COMMENTS 1 04/10/2020 D E S I G N Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 www.eIanIab.com f 612.260.7990 C E R T I F I C A T 1 0 N I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professio eer under the laws of the statl A. `O(�` NU bI`wGj ONAs G Stephen M. Johnston DATE REGISTRATION NO. 18914 01/17/2020 SHEET PHASE SITE PLAN C-1 02 1"=20' SCALE IN FEET PROJECT NO. ARC19010 rod _ '9 ICJ .p m093 A��o �6 \\ B�� L �VGT�N x 1 ,, ,q cn > Q \� °� � _ ANC o - = T� T ti - _- NT x _ Y w x ------ - w6 V _ONqL R , MATCH '- HICHw ' ILR pq� - (A 6 MATCH `/ w � r - � w - N - OR/ ���� 934.6 ul ? \\ --- - W 0 -----W--------------- -- ------------ A Z w 935.0 s � w o w ----=__- j i 934.9 _ 934.607 3 p� - _ _•_ : - - - o a�� - w N = T a _ xl � 9 .3 o N-_ ---------_---------------------------- - - - - --------- OD a W - ED w ° it 933.9 \\\ �Ro, _-,\_ / ° ° `°--_1/ / / 933.6 < -_ X933.2 ���61 Nli 935.0 SB 6 934.4 / 933.4 1 ° ' 934 Ro - - - -� = e-----_= N ° N 934.4 933.3 - - 3 X a ° 3 - _ _ _ I i 934.7 934.45 934.4 �; s - _ _ _ _ I 935.0 1 934.25 / / R E TAB I L ° /- / x ° 134.0 x ° - - <o I / `O - _ - --- 933 ° 1 / FFE 934.1 P �k I 933.9 - - _ _ • - - _ _ ------ h w / 934.70933.6- - ° ° / / � I '/w - >, o m �+ Ix 1 934.55 / /RP -TAIL ° / �w w / 9� ---- - ---- - ---- / + ° ° 933.55 I°° ° SB-9 916 �0' g33.a 0 �° FFE 933.35 934.35 � G� / 934.45 -/ 934.25 m _ 9 3.5 ° ° I °I ° 934.15 ° y ° 933.5 934.7 / 1933.66 x 3 933.9 %33.3 / / ° s r ° ° 34.7 x - 933.7 125' SHORELINE 933.3 75 °° '�----- 02 - - - I ° > ° ° (A SETBACK -- / j \ 934.2X \ L 1 \ x ® _ 932.7 ewe s3a & 933.2 �' f' = \ _ � 932.65 - ,, \ - / w 33.15� 1 1 � 934.5 x I - , ° /- 932.5 \ - _ - 932.4 '� \ \ �/ I' c _ 93 05 RETAIL N ° ' SB-5 / / . ° .1 - - 932.1 x------- ' / SB2 'g o� / � __� W - 1 \ FEE 935.4 w UTIL o �, / DRAINAGE & ITY / `1 x _- \ \ x / / EASEMENT 932.9 + 31.8 / C _ x ° ro i - - ° ° 934.2 - -x \ J 9 4.5 so / / J 932.65 932.3 - // 932.85 � � w I / �A 931.85 w 931.75 x w� ° w � w °w � _ 931.65 931.49 - _ 12HORELINE w io w - ' I ° ^` ° ° �' / - 933.15 932.2 / -- - / j w -� N ° 8 ° - ° X.- 1 / j / \ \� \ - - - - +�s�. 32.75 / qe 931.70 0 / g 3 w \ SB-15 10' w .41 :DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT x ° w� A to (,A, w�A w X __ _ N -_ \ --- `; �_-- 7 `� / /L - \ ---� _ 32. /� -_-- `._ - _ / to SIB 1710' � RESTAURANT, /� \� \ - _ N 93 s610 UR CA \ \ 931.1 WL ate_- �� �/// / . '` �\\ \\\ R 08% \ �`\ _ \\ \\ °D cn ����� L/�`�I,� ®® wL \\ �:\\\ - SB-8 .��° ° \\ \ -\ SB1120'i 1,140 CF FLOOD PLAIN \ \ � wL \ \� REPLACEMENT �� �� / \ w� \ \ \ \ \ ,rPOND EASEMENT wL \ w�Y- 929 \,# __ 8.3OHWL �wL HWL 928.5 WETLAND BOUNDARY \� EDGE OF DELINEATED WETLAND EDGE OF ICE MEASURED ON 12-05-19 ICE ELEVATION = ASSUMED OHWL OVERALL GRADING NOTES 1. VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR UNKNOWN UTILITIES ARE FOUND THAT IMPACT DESIGN OR IMPAIR CONSTRUCTION, THE ENGINEER AND OWNER SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED. 2. ALL WORK TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MNDOT) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS NOTED. 3. FOLLOW ALL RECOMMENDATIONS PRESENTED IN GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT PREPARED BY NTI . FLOOD PLAIN SUMMARY TOTAL FILL 1,100 CF TOTAL REPLACEMENT 1,140 CF OVERALL GRADING PLAN ill =30' NPDES AREA SUMMARY EXISTING PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS BUILDING PAVEMENT TOTAL IMPV 0 ACRES 0 ACRES 0.454 ACRES 0.578 ACRES 0 ACRES 1.032 ACRES PERVIOUS 4.126 ACRES 3.094 ACRES TOTAL 4.126 ACRES 4.126 ACRES EGG LAKE OHW=926.62(NAVD88) L W L 1,110 CF FLOOD PLAIN - FILL 932.85 932.75 - 932.52 932.3 MATCH 932.6 A MATCH 933.0 -_--- - 932.7x .0- k932 6 ® e 933 S 432.85 933.20 x 933.02 w, 932.9 -/ �i 932.65 to w Ca ° W w io X V� \ 932.6 \ x ZZ \ L4 I ;o A00 W j \ x V '1 to w w.41 \_- o I -4 w \ Mtn G X ®06 \ � , - ARDEN \� 932.24 93`4 0 3 3 - SB_ �10 ° _ a to WLA \\ \ 11 x / \\ �� w \ w vv FUTURE EVENT yv v CENTER \ \ n 2 \ N / •�6 0 w W \� ys POND EASEMENT \ WL UNDER DECK INFILTRATION BASIN BOTTOM 929.6 OVERFLOW 930.8 HWL 930.9 \ \�v\k930 v� \ \c � \ WC \ \ HWL 928.5 EDGE OF DELINEATED WETLAND EDGE OF ICE MEASURED ON 12-05-19 ICE ELEVATION = ASSUMED OHWL SB 12 20 x / w �•Y` r � // // 1 `w \/ x r / / 933.3 v V �32 DRAINAGE & UTILITY\ \ \ \ T EASEMENT NORTH INFILTRATION BASIN BOTTOM 929.7 \ OVERFLOW 931.2 \ '9 \ \ HWL 931.3 B+ v v X TRAIL EASEMENT 1 io - io \ . •� \ \\ \J r\ � w 1 0 \ L / 1 i � x 19 I 1 I < /« , + 92 8, co m C X oct) Z Z � OAK STREET a Know wha is below. Cal before you dig. 30 CC] SCALE IN FEET ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.c. 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-436-4030 PROJECT CATTLE HOUSE RESTAURANT & EVENT CENTER HUGO, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN REVIEW oz/17/2020 ISSUE DATE AMENDED CITY APPLICATION 02/20/2020 CITY COMMENTS 03/02/2020 CITY COMMENTS 1 04/10/2020 D E S I G N Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 www.eIanIab.com f 612.260.7990 C E R T I FICATION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professio Per under the laws of the statey,Qf�ll A. 01 �Au ONS' C Stephen M. Johnston DATE REGISTRATION NO. 18914 01/17/2020 SHEET OVERALL GRADING PLAN C-201 PROJECT NO. ARC19010 (10 -�X933.2 T- 1 934 - o-------- > -} - 934.0 9 932.0 ------- / 0 / , ' ! 933.9 - ' - �1� MATCH 933.80 - / r 93 / CV cxo / 30 / 932.75 933.5 933.40 / 931.91 932.90 -IR ------ - - � - - 932.25 i M ° OVERFLOW PATH (10 w ry i----= rn =__- 932.7p- 933.00 k9`32.6 932.80 ® 0.. .20 933.50 933.10 0aA 931.85 i 932.85 0 / 932.75 ��� X93 1 ' 932.90 I 931.77� ° - ° o °° 933.02 / X ---__ 3 l / _ - � \ CA- - CAW�LA CA I 0 932.75 Xco 932.62 / 932.25 2.1 % 31-75 _ 0.5% p-�OVV X l _ / l I - -I ' cc 931.61 931.55 �J o - _ 931.65 _ - - _ 0.5%- p=LOVy 932.70 i 7 _ 932: t0- _ _ ° 932.66 o.i _ �) 932.06 x 931 931.60 _ _ _ M 932.23 __ ___ CA 931.23 932 52 " �o + �`' 931.49 ( 931.51 932.37 9 co 931.87 - _ _ X 1� `°p° p� co p w � OVERFLOW PATH w cN 932.49 x_W ___- CA � \\ ��� o w/CA X ° ° w X \ � ------ __ CD �932.03 °� 32.65 ° 932.30 \ i V 932.60 x __� /--_� C� 931.70 I ° \ \ w = �_ _ Z _Z p \ 932.8 0 9 9 1. �4 � � 932.3 \ rn � b � � zz J + 931.65 932.27 p ° \ 932.72 �a�" X + S�8 931�625 ° ° A 932.67 W m .6� - 932.51 �zj� _ x ����_, 931.62 AV �` �. Ln W 931.21 932.9 ° 932.78 \ o _ W ------------ - _ _ 931.15 931.577 931.90 �� \ 932.78 \ °° `S� m 'J o F// RESTAURANT-N, 932.51X931.53 �i co X 2 931.09 931.53 c° \ 931.50 ° 6 �� -)- i CA A 9341 �i x Gq R 931.34 - 931.50 w� X i x \ DEN -0- - f FFE 933.0 Q �� °i o CA 932.39 19 w I o °° 932.78 \ \RS`3S X 93 - - _ _ +9�9 � 931.10 � i 0 931.66 93'L 14 - ? , 932.78 �� - ------ -�__ 931.70 p 0 931.16 \\ 932.9 932.9 SS ° S ti 932.24 g34 w - _ 932.25 '� _ 9 931.62 302 - 931.15 931 932 - _ _ �C�r ��\� \ ° 933 \ - 931.58 - - - 931.4 6 - - 93,1.05 929 -_ 32.5 0 - - _ 2 - DECK o ° x ` \�N � � \ 932.9 �� � � ° p � `/� _ ° \ \ 92 �y W �< \ "' \ \ cxo \�� ` \ 932.15 \m 932.5 wL� 28 3 g g v M�43 v VA w �� `�� \ �° o \ ---- 929.93- - - - - - - - \\� wL \ \ % \\rn _ \� X �� 931 0 -- A `° X v 930.38 v ° v v 931.4 \ VA EVEN �\ \ 932.09 ( / \ 932.9 \ FUTURE T \ \ \ \ \ \ v 932.4, CENTER 931.4 y off� � v � �� '_A �`, 931.9 � � � c9 \ �� -_,: EGG LAKE 928.1 ���.A `� 931.4� ��� 932.9 N \ CI6 p \\�9� v \ TUBE w��� ���� 932.65 OHW-926.62(NAVD88) � � v DE n - \ + �.�� / CA/ 933.0 \ ,.10wLwL \ 4 .a✓ �/ 933.0 LWL- \\�'' N , / \ x 932.65,,I� NI iN,Ndo x UNDER DECK INFILTRATION BASIN \\\ 932.4 \ \ / �� / / X 9� 2 BOTTOM 929.6 �'< \ t 932.4 �� ` X OVERFLOW 930.8 \`N\ 931.9 / / / /� W HWL 930.9 I \� - \ N'\ 43`� 928.1 PHASE I GRADING PLAN 1"=20' INFILTRATION CONSTRUCTION ( 1 (TYP) C-503 EDGE OF ICE MEASURED ON 12-05-19- ICE ELEVATION = OWHL EDGE OF DELINEATED WETLAND HWL 928.5 NINII 933.�`,`\ \ \ / < <� IN / NORTH INFILTRATION BASIN \ \ BOTTOM 929.7 933.0 \ OVERFLOW 931.2 \ 3� \ J HWL 931.3 � 3 / \ \\ N, IN \\ !v`; / LA \ V \ ry w� \ \ \ IN.NN / NN IN NI �9� \� IN �S7 N CP c° I 933.3 GRADING NOTES 1. VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR UNKNOWN UTILITIES ARE FOUND THAT IMPACT DESIGN OR IMPAIR CONSTRUCTION, THE ENGINEER AND OWNER SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED. 2. ALL WORK TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MNDOT) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS NOTED. 3. FOLLOW ALL RECOMMENDATIONS PRESENTED IN GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT PREPARED BY NTI, EXCEPT AS MODIFIED IN THESE NOTES. 4. ALL NON -GRANULAR SOILS, AND TOPSOIL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM WITHIN THE PROPOSED BUILDING PAD. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE SHALL OBSERVE THE PROJECT EXCAVATIONS TO VERIFY THAT UNSUITABLE MATERIALS HAVE BEEN PROPERLY REMOVED FROM PROPOSED STRUCTURAL AREAS, THAT ADEQUATE BEARING SUPPORT IS PROVIDED BY THE EXPOSED SOILS AND THAT STRUCTURAL FILL IS PLACED APPROPRIATELY. THE EXPOSED SOIL AT THE BASE OF FOOTINGS OR THICKENED SLAB SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 98 PERCENT PROCTOR DRY DENSITY (ASTM D698). 5. ON -SITE GRANULAR SOIL IS GENERALLY SUITABLE FOR STRUCTURAL FILL. SILTY OR ORGANIC SOILS SHALL NOT BE USED FOR STRUCTURAL FILL. PLACEMENT OF STRUCTURAL FILL SHALL BE OBSERVED AND TESTED BY AN EXPERIENCED TECHNICIAN OR ENGINEER TO VERIFY THAT PROPER COMPACTION HAS BEEN ACHIEVED. STRUCTURAL FILL SHALL BE MOISTURE CONDITIONED (DRIED OR WETTED) AS APPROPRIATE PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. MOISTURE CONDITIONED ENGINEERED FILL SHALL BE PLACED AND COMPACTED IN LOOSE LIFTS OF 8 INCHES OR LESS. EACH LIFT OF FILL SHOULD BE COMPACTED BY LARGE VIBRATORY EQUIPMENT UNTIL THE IN -PLACE SOIL DENSITY IS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THE CRITERIA ESTABLISHED WITHIN THE FOLLOWING TABULATION. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION COMPACTION CRITERIA MOISTURE CONTENT VARIANCE FROM OPTIMUM (% RESPECTIVE PROCTOR) -3 TO +3% FOR SAND AND GRAVEL SOILS NON -ENGINEERED FILL (GREEN SPACE) 95 <3% FOR CLAY SOILS -3 TO +3% FOR SAND AND GRAVEL SOILS ENGINEERED FILL BELOW FOUNDATIONS 98 <3% FOR CLAY SOILS -3 TO +3% FOR SAND AND GRAVEL SOILS ENGINEERED FILL BELOW FLOOR SLABS 98 <3% FOR CLAY SOILS 6. PARKING LOT SUBGRADE SHALL NOT BE COMPACTED. EXCAVATED TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION WITH TRACKED EQUIPMENT THAT IMPARTS MINIMAL LOAD. DO NOT EXCAVATED WORK IN SUBGRADE WHEN WET OR WHEN PRECIPITATION IS IMMINENT. 7. SIDEWALLS SHALL BE RETAINED BENCHED OR SLOPED TO PROVIDE SAFE WORKING CONDITIONS. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSESSING THE STABILITY OF AND EXECUTING PROJECT EXCAVATIONS USING SAFE METHODS. THE CONTRACTOR IS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR NAMING THE "COMPETENT INDIVIDUAL" AS PER SUBPART P OF 29 CFR 1926.6 (FEDERAL REGISTER - OSHA). 8. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN OF SOIL, UTILITY AND BUILDING RETENTION SYSTEMS. 9. PAVEMENT: SEE DETAILS SHEET C-502 FOR BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION. 10. CONCRETE MIX NO.3F52 (MNDOT 2461) SHALL BE USED FOR HAND PLACED FORMED CURB AND GUTTER, MEDIANS, DRIVEWAYS, CROSS GUTTERS, SIDEWALKS, PEDESTRIAN RAMPS AND MEDIANS. CONCRETE MIX NO.3F32, MNDOT SPECIFICATION 2461) SHALL BE USED FOR AN EXTRUSION MACHINE PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE. IN THE PRODUCTION OF CONCRETE, AN AIR ENTRAINING AGENT SHALL BE ADDED TO THE MIX ACCORDING TO MNDOT 2461.4. 11. FORM COATING MATERIAL SHALL MEET MNDOT 3902. 12. CONCRETE INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM WITH MNDOT 2531. 13. SITE CONCRETE FINISHING - CONCRETE SHALL BE STRUCK TRUE TO CROSS SECTION AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. NO ADDITIONAL WATER MAY BE ADDED TO AID IN THE FINISHING PROCESS. A LIGHT BROOM FINISH WILL BE REQUIRED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE CENTER LINE ON ALL CONCRETE WORK UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE. ALL EXPOSED EDGES AND JOINTS IN CURB,GUTTER, SIDEWALK AND STEPS SHALL BE ROUNDED WITH A SUITABLE EDGING TOOL. BEFORE FINAL FINISHING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK THE CONCRETE WITH A TEN (10) FOOT STEEL STRAIGHT EDGE TO ENSURE THERE IS NO VARIATION GREATER THAN 3/16"FROM THE STRAIGHT EDGE ON TANGENT LINES OR GRADES. IF DEVIATIONS GREATER THAN 3/16" ARE FOUND THE WORK WILL BE CONSIDERED AS UNACCEPTABLE AND WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED AT NO EXPENSE TO THE OWNER. 14. CONCRETE CURING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY APPLYING A MEMBRANE CURING COMPOUND (TYPE 2, WHITE PIGMENTED, MNDOT 3754) TO THE EXPOSED SURFACE OF THE CONCRETE WITHIN ONE (1)HOUR AFTER FINISHING THE CONCRETE SURFACES. WHEN THE FORMS ARE REMOVED IN LESS THAN 72 HOURS AFTER PLACING THE CONCRETE, THE CURING COMPOUND SHALL BE APPLIED IMMEDIATELY TO THE EXPOSED SURFACES. THE RATE OF APPLICATION OF CURING COMPOUND SHALL BE 150 SQUARE FEET PER GALLON. THE COMPOUND SHALL APPEAR AS WHITE AS A SHEET OF PAPER AFTER APPLICATION ON THE CONCRETE SURFACE. 15. PREFORMED EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL MEET MNDOT 3702, AND SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: AT THE BEGINNING AND END OF ALL CURB AND GUTTER RADII. WHERE NEW CONCRETE SURROUNDS, ADJOINS, OR ABUTS ANY EXISTING FIXED OBJECTS SUCH AS FIRE HYDRANTS, BUILDING FOUNDATIONS, CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS, SIDEWALKS, AND OTHER RIGID STRUCTURES. AFTER EACH LOAD OF CONCRETE WHEN PLACING CURB AND EVERY 100 FEET WHEN PLACING SIDEWALK. CONTRACTION JOINTS WILL NOT BE SEALED BUT WILL BE REQUIRED AT A SPACING OF 10 FEET ON CURB AND GUTTER AND ON SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. CONTRACTION JOINTS WILL BE CUT TO A DEPTH 1/3 THE THICKNESS OF THE CONCRETE, SURFACE AND BACK OF ALL CURBS. CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED SO THAT NO SLAB IS LARGER THAN 100 SQUARE FEET IN AREA. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTING CONTRACTION JOINTS THAT PREVENT CONCRETE FROM CRACKING AT OTHER LOCATIONS. 16. CONCRETE TESTING INCLUDING SLUMP, AIR ENTRAINMENT, TEMPERATURE AND COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SHALL BE PERFORMED ON THE FIRST LOAD OF THE DAY FOR ALL CONCRETE POURS OF AT LEAST 4 CUBIC YARDS. AN ADDITIONAL TEST SHALL BE PERFORMED FOR EACH 100 CUBIC YARDS OR PORTION THEREOF. a Know what's below. 20 60 CaII before you dig. I SCALE IN FEET ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-436-4030 PROJECT CATTLE HOUSE RESTAURANT & EVENT CENTER HUGO, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN REVIEW 02/17/2020 ISSUE DATE AMENDED CITY APPLICATION 02/20/2020 CITY COMMENTS 03/02/2020 CITY COMMENTS 1 04/10/2020 D E S I G N Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 www.eIanIab.com f 612.260.7990 C E R T I FICATION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professio eer under the laws of the stateyQf 11 A. `0\ NU `wC, G ONS� Stephen M. Johnston DATE REGISTRATION NO. 18914 01/17/2020 SHEET PHASE GRADING PLAN C-202 PROJECT NO. ARC19010 Project Name / Location Project Name Cattle House Restaurant Project Address XXX US Highway 61, Hugo, MN 55441 Property ID Latitude / Longitude 45.161685,-92.992219 Project Type Commercial Site Redevelopment Contacts Owner Contractor (Operator) Preparer Tony Harmening TBD Steve Johnston, PE Cattle House LLC Elan Design Lab, Inc. 18100 Forest Blvd 901 N 3rd St. Forest Lake MN 55025 Suite 120 Minneapolis, MN 55401 218-349-4673 612-260-7982 fancyfarmerorganics@gmail.com sjohnston@elanlab.com SWPPP Design Certification Expires 2020 General SWPPP Responsibilities The Contractor (Operator) shall provide a knowledgeable and experienced person(s) to oversee the implementation of the SWPPP and the installation. Inspection and maintenance of the erosion and sediment control BMP's before and during construction. Training must be in conformance with the NPDES Construction Permit requirements. Training documentation must kept on -site with the SWPPP and the trained person must be available on -site within 72 hours. Both the Owner and Contractor (Operator) shall be responsible for the proper termination and/or transfer of the permit. The owner will be responsible for the long term operation and maintenance of the permanent storm water management system(s). Unless specifically stated the engineer shall have no responsibility for any SWPPP activities during or after construction. Project Description The 4.237 acre project site is located on the east side of US Highway 61 at 146th Street North. The site is directly adjacent to Egg Lake. The site has been cleared of all buildings as a precursor for redevelopment. Prior to clearing the site approximately 44% was covered with impervious surfaces. The proposed development includes a 5,000 square feet (sf) restaurant, 3,870 sf event center and three retail buildings totaling 10,100 sf, along with associated parking and other site amenities. This report only addresses the first 2 phases of the development which includes the restaurant, event center and 8ppsoximately 60 stalls. The stormwater solution for the first phase will be utilized for the future phases. Topsoil over apparent undocumented fill soils were encountered extending to depths ranging from approximately 2.0 to 9.0 feet below the existing ground surface. The soils encountered beneath the undocumented fill soils generally consisted of poorly graded sand (SP), poorly graded sand with silt (SP- SM), and silty sand (SM) soils. The undocumented fill soils encountered in the soil borings are not considered suitable for direct support of the foundations and slabs. Receiving Waters The site is directly adjacent to Egg Lake. Project Plans The following plan sheets are hereby incorporated into this SWPPP Sheet Number Description Date C-201 Grading Plan 03-02-2020 C-202 Phase I Grading Plan 03-02-2020 C-204 Erosion Control Plan 03-02-2020 Stormwater Related Reviews and Permits Agency Type of Permit or Review Status City of Hugo PUD, Platting, Stormwater Management, Pending Erosion and Sediment Control, Grading Permit, Building Permits MPCA Construction Stormwater To be acquired by contractor. Stormwater Management System Overview See Stormwater Management Plan incorporated herein by reference for details on system design, flow rates and volumes and system capacities. In general to achieve rate and volume control it is proposed to construct the entire parking lot utilizing porous bituminous pavement. The grading plan shows a typical grade of 0.5% on the pavement which will facilitate 100% infiltration of rainfall events up to the 10 year 24 hour storm and surface overflow for the 100 year event. The portion of the building with a flat roof will drain via an internal drain system and discharge into a rock lined filtration basin under the deck. The trash area and overflow from the east side of the site pass through a grass surfaced infiltration basin. See Operations and Maintenance Manual for post construction system maintenance requirements. Erosion Prevention, Measures - General The Contractor (Operator) is responsible for all erosion prevention measures for the project including but are not limited to the following: 1. The Contractor (Operator) shall plan and implement appropriate construction practice and construction phasing to minimize erosion and retain vegetation whenever possible 2. All areas not to be disturbed shall be delineated with flags, stakes, signs, or other means necessary to protect these areas before construction begins on the site. 3. All drainage ditches and/or swales shall have temporary or permanent stabilization within 24 hours of connecting to a surface water or 24 hours after construction activity in the ditch/swale has temporarily or permanently ceased. 4. All pipe outlets shall have temporary or permanent energy dissipation within 24 hours of connecting to a surface water. 5. All exposed soils shall be stabilized as soon as possible to limit soil erosion. In no case shall un- worked areas, including stock piles, have exposed soils for more than 14 days without providing temporary or permanent stabilization. (7 days for projects with a receiving water that is impaired or special) Sediment Control Measures and Timing - General The Operator (Contractor) is responsible for all sediment control measures for the project. Sediment control measures include but are not limited to the following: 1. Sediment control measures shall be established on all down gradient perimeters before any up - gradient land disturbing activities begin. These measures shall remain in place until final stabilization has been established. 2. On slopes with 3:1 or steeper grades there shall be no unbroken slope length greater than 75 feet. 3. All storm drrain inlets and culvert inlets shall be protected by an appropriate BMP during construction until all sources with potential for discharging to the inlet has been stabilized. Inlet and culvert protection shall conform to the MnDOT Specifications 2573 and 3891. 4. Stock piles shall be provided with an effective sediment perimeter control and shall not be placed in any type of surface water or drainageway. 5. Vehicle tracking shall be minimized with effective BMP's. Where the BMP's fail to prevent sediment from tracking onto streets the Contractor shall conduct street sweeping to remove all tracked sediment. 6. The Operator is responsible for identifying the need for temporary sediment basins based on actual field conditions to protect downstream resources. Temporary sediment basins shall be constructed before up gradient vegetation is disturbed and maintained until the risk of damage to downstream resources is mitigated by other means. Dewatering and Basin Draining Activities - General The Operator is responsible for adhering to all dewatering and surface drainage regulations, including but not limited to the following: 1. Whenever possible water from dewatering activities shall discharge to a temporary and/or permanent sediment basin. 2. If water cannot be discharged to a sedimentation basin, it shall be treated with other appropriate BMP's, to effectively remove sediment. 3. All discharge points shall be protected from erosion and scour. 4. Discharge water shall be dispersed over an effective energy dissipation measure. 5. All water from dewatering shall be discharged in a manner that does not cause nuisance conditions, erosion, or inundation of wetlands. Water shall not be discharged to adjacent residential properties. It must be discharged to the public street. Final Stabilization - General The Operator is responsible for ensuring final stabilization of the site, including but is not limited to the following: 1. All soil disturbing activities have been completed. 2. All exposed soils have been uniformly stabilized. 3. All drainage ditches, ponds and all storm water conveyance systems have been cleared of sediment and stabilized to preclude erosion. The contractor will remain responsible for establishment of at least 80% perennial vegetation coverage and the removal of temporary BMP's. Temporary Sediment Basin During construction the contractor shall excavate and maintain temporary sediment basins as needed to prevent sediment from reaching the storm drainage system, permanent filtration areas, wetlands and other environmentally sensitive areas or impeding access to the site by tenants. Construction Sequencing Contractor shall comply with the following sequence. The Contractor may make adjustments to the sequence if needed) to address their means and methods and unanticipated field conditions. Note: this section is subject to revision after construction sequencing is determined. 1. Install inlet protection in downstream structures. 2. Install perimeter silt fence and other barriers as indicated on the plan (at a minimum). The contractor is responsible for any additional sediment control that is needed to prevent sediment from leaving the site. 3. Install rock construction entrance. Move as needed during construction. 4. Do not strip topsoil in parking areas. Limit construction traffic within the parking lots to the extent practical. 5. Perform earthwork for building, install utilities. 6. Construct building. 7. Construct infiltration basin before deck construction. 8. Restrict access to the site during parking lots construction. 9. Strip and salvage topsoil from parking lots. Perform excavation and embankment necessary to bring parking lots to subgrade elevation. Remove and replace any non -granular soils encountered. 10. Scarify subgrade to a depth of 12". Blade to final subgrade elevation. 11. Perform double ring infiltrometer tests on subgrade at the minimum rate of 1 per 5,000 square feet. The minimum acceptable infiltration rate is 0.3 inches per hour. 12. Install curbs, sidewalks, rock, choker and pavement. 13. Install permanent landscaping. Do not store any landscape materials on pavement surface. 14. Remove sediment barriers as building construction and permanent landscaping is completed. 15. Vacuum pavement surface when all construction except striping has occurred. 16. Stripe parking lot 17. Monitor vegetation and reinstall as needed until fully established. 18. File NPDES Notice of Termination ("NOT") with MPCA within 30 days of final stabilization. Note that the north infiltration basin is not constructed until event center is complete. Inspection and maintenance All inspections, maintenance, repairs, replacements and removal are to be considered incidental to the BMP bid items. The Contractor (Operator) is responsible for completing required inspections maintenance and observation of weather conditions and rainfall amounts to ensure compliance with the permit requirements. The Contractor (Operator) shall observe the construction site once every seven (7) days during active construction and within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours. The Contractor (Operator) shall keep a summary maintenance/construction observation report to be recorded after each site visit/observation. The Contractor (Operator) shall submit a copy of the written inspections monthly to the Owner. Records shall include the following: 1. Date and time of inspections 2. Name of person conducting inspection 3. Findings and recommendations for corrective actions if necessary 4. Corrective actions taken 5. Date and arnount of rainfalls greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours 6. Mention of any changes made to the SWPPP 7. A site map indicating active construction areas and land disturbing activities. The Contractor (Operator) must keep the SWPPP, all inspection reports and amendments onsite. The Contractor (Operator) shall designate a specific location to keep the records whenever construction activity is in progress. All erosion prevention and sedimentation control BMP's must be inspected to ensure integrity and effectiveness. All nonfunctional BMP's must be repaired, replaced or supplemented with functional BMP's. The Contractor (Operator) must investigate and comply with the following inspection and maintenance requirements: 1. All sediment barriers including silt fence, bio-logs, and similar devices must be repaired replaced or supplemented when they become nonfunctional or the sediment reaches 1/3 of the barrier height. These repairs shall be made within 24 hours of discovery. 2. Temporary sediment basins must be drained and the sediment removed when the depth of sediment collected in the basin reaches 1/2 the storage volume. Drainage and removal must be 3. �8 gty-vLi,wr&iaggliadrqr&ir&qgFyhes and conveyance systems, must be inspected for evidence of erosion and sediment deposition. The Operator shall remove all deltas and sediment deposited in surface waters, including drainage ways, catch basins, and other drainage systems. The Operator shall re -stabilize the areas where sediment removal results in exposed soil. Removal and stabilization must take place within 7 days of discovery, unless precluded by legal, regulatory or physical constraints. The Contractor (Operator) is responsible for contacting all local, regional, state and federal authorities and receiving any applicable permits, prior to conducting any work. 4. Construction site vehicle exit locations shall be inspected daily for evidence of off -site sediment tracking onto paved surfaces. Tracked sediment must be removed from all paved surfaces within 24 hours of discovery. 5. The Contractor (Operator) is responsible for the operation and maintenance of temporary and permanent water quality BMP's. As well as erosion and sediment control BMP's for the duration of the construction work at the site. 6. If sediment: escapes the construction site, all off -site accumulations of sediment must be removed in a manner and at a frequency sufficient to minimize off -site impacts. 7. All filtration areas must be inspected to ensure that no sediment from ongoing construction activities is reaching the filtration areas and these areas are protected from compaction due to construction equipment driving across the filtration area. 8. The Contractor is solely responsible for all costs associated with reconstructing the rain garden when the functionality is compromised by the contractor's actions or inaction to protect the basin. Pollution Prevention Management Measures The Contractor (Operator) shall be responsible for all pollution prevention management measures. The Contractor (Operator) is responsible for informing all visitors and/or personnel on -site of the pollution prevention management measures. All pollution prevention management measures are to be considered incidental to the overall project bid, unless otherwise noted. Pollution prevention management measures include but are not limited to the following: 1. The Contractor (Operator) is responsible for the proper disposal, in compliance with MPCA disposal requirements, of all solid or liquid waste and hazardous materials on -site. 2. Concrete trucks shall not be allowed to wash out or discharge surplus concrete or drum wash water on -site, unless done in an engineered leak -proof containment system. The engineered system provided by the Contractor (Operator) must include site drawings for the project file and written assurance that the system will work as designed and leave no discharge of concrete or concrete residue potential to waters of the state during a minimum of a 100-year storm event. A sign must be installed adjacent to each washout system to inform concrete equipment Operators to utilize the proper facilities. The concrete washout containment system and all related items shall be considered incidental to the project bid. 3. All nonhazardous waste materials shall be collected and stored in a securely lidded metal dumpster or other approved containment method at the end of each day. Any alternative to a metal dumppster must be submitted in writing for approval by the project engineer. The dumpster shall be emptied as necessary to function as intended for debris collection. No construction garbage or waste material shall be buried on -site. 4. A licensed sanitary waste management Contractor shall collect all sanitary waste from the portable units at a rate necessary to maintain designed function. 5. All fertilizers shall be stored in a covered shelter. Partially used bags shall be transferred to a sealable bin to reduce the chance of spillage. 6. External washing of trucks and other construction vehicles and engine degreasing are prohibited at the construction site. All vehicles on -site shall be monitored for leaks and receive regular prevention maintenance to reduce the chance of leakage. Petroleum products shall be stored in tightly sealed containers. Which are clearly labeled. Spill kits shall be included with all fueling sources and maintenance activities. Secondary containment measures shall be installed and maintained by the Operator. 7. Any asphalt substances used on -site shall be applied in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. 8. All paint containers and curing compounds shall be tightly sealed and stored when not required for use. Excess paint and/or curing compounds shall not be discharged into the storm sewer system and shall be properly disposed of according to manufacturer's instruction. 9. Materials and equipment necessary for spill clean-up shall be kept in an enclosed trailer or shed on -site. Equipment shall include. But not limited to, brooms, mops, dust pans, rags, gloves, goggles, absorbent (kitty litter) oil absorbent booms and diapers and buckets. 10. All spills shall be contained and cleaned up immediately upon discovery. Spills large enough to reach the storm water conveyance system shall be reported to the Minnesota duty officer at 1- 800-422-0798. Quantities Practice Detail / Spec. Unit Quantity Silt Fence 3/C-503 LF 1,325 J-Hook Silt Fence 6/C-503 LF 175 Rock Construction Entrance 7/C-503 Each 1 Storm Structure Protection 4/C-503 Each 3 Sod & Landscaping MnDOT 3878 Sy 3,065 Rip Rap MnDOT CL1 Sy 410 Stabilization Seeding MnDOT 22-112 Sy 2,350 Mesic Prairie Seeding MnDOT 35-241 Sy 325 Stormwater Seeding Mndot 33-261 Sy 75 Ripparian Seeding MnDot 34-261 Sy 110 Fiber Blanket: 3/C-503 Sy 330 Post Construction Operation and Maintenance Maintenance of the storm water management facilities will be the responsibility of the Owner and will be subject to an agreement with the City of Hugo. The agreement will include the following items. See full O & M plan for further details. 1. Pavement shall be vacuumed twice per year after spring melt and autumn leaf fall. 2. Grass clipping shall not be blown on to pavement surface. 3. Sediment and trash accumulation shall be inspected on regular basis and removed when facility is impacted). 4. Debris must be disposed in a licensed landfill. 5. Noxious weeds shall be removed from the site on an annual basis before they go to seed. Amendments to the SWPPP The SWPPP will be amended as needed and/or as required by provisions of the permit. Amendments will be approved by both the Owner and Contractor (Operator) and will be attached to the SWPPP as an additional sheet. The SWPPP and amendments will be kept on site by the Contractor (Operator) whenever construction activity is in progress. ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-436-4030 PROJECT CATTLE HOUSE RESTAURANT & EVENT CENTER HUGO, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN REVIEW oz/17/2020 ISSUE DATE AMENDED CITY APPLICATION 02/20/2020 CITY COMMENTS 03/02/2020 CITY COMMENTS 1 04/10/2020 D E S I G N Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 www.eIanIab.com f 612.260.7990 C E R T I F I C A T 1 0 N I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professio eer under the laws of the statey.Qi�ll A. `OA` ONS� C Stephen M. Johnston DATE REGISTRATION NO. 18914 01/17/2020 SHEET C-203 PROJECT NO. ARC19010 m 01) m CTO WAS -____\, CTO ESN INLET PROTECTION — _ (TYP) O A 1 V ,q/�,QO 7-�, RE - ,qo� S - H� AL RAI CONSTRUCTION ClyWq �, LROA� ---_-- ��_ C-503 ENTRANCE U �_ o. 61 — A �T HO \"•_ ' INLET PROTECTION (TYP) m j / — — _ _ _ _ _ _ — — _ _ — _ ,r� 4 INLET PROTECTION (TYP)_— / �X� /\» _ C 503 k x _ --- _ _ - -- ---- ------ INLET PROTECTION vxv� — — — — _ (TYP) �' I {x 934 MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE OF PHASE II AREA _ f / / /--------------------- MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE OF PHASE II AREA / — ----- — / — i,/L_ _ ------------------'- -. / _. _.__ — — _--- --- _ ,' J HOOK SILT FENCE 6 --- — ---- _-- ---- _=_ (TYP) C 503 WL� — — YL \ 1? � \ \ — � \ WL HWL 928.5 \ EDGE OF DELINEATED WETLAND EDGE OF ICE MEASURED ON 12-05-19 EGG LAKE ICE ELEVATION = ASSUMED OHWL OHW=926.62(NAVD88) RIP RAP 2 OVERFLOW (TYP) C 503 SILT FENCE (TYP) rn — �99 i _ SILT FENCE \ \ (TYP) \ o o ry \ \ 934 DOUBLE ROW HEAVY DUTY J/// SILT FENCE \� (TYP) v EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 5 I ♦ \` \� (TYP) C-503 \ w� 933 SILT FENCE (TYP) N / op o� % / / + / \i CC X � + +� \V < V 93 \ VA\ SILT FENCE VA \V (TYP) C 503 \< `v ♦` v v LEGEND \ HWL 928.5 v ---------- SILT FENCE - INSTALL BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION VA�\ EDGE OF DELINEATED WETLAND SOD & LANDSCAPE PLANTING SEE SHEET L-101 \\\ \\\ / HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE - INSTALL BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION MNDOT MIXTURE 22-112 FIVE-YEAR STABILIZATION \\�\ EDGE OF ICE MEASURED ON 12-05-19 \ \\ r \ STORM STRUCTURE PROTECTION BROADCAST SEEDING \ \\ ICE ELEVATION = ASSUMED OHWL \\ / SEEDING RATE PLS 40 LBS/AC. \\\ 2"-3/4" RIVER ROCK MULCH OVER FILTER FABRIC / / MNDOT MIXTURE 35-241 MESIC PRAIRIE GENERAL \\\ \\\ //// BROADCAST SEEDING \\\ SEEDING RATE PLS 36.5 LBS/AC. \\\ O O 6" MNDOT CLASS I RIPRAP O O O O + MNDOT MIXTURE 33-261 STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST BROADCAST SEEDING \\\ OVER FILTER FABRIC ++++++++++ \\\ SEEDING RATE PLS 35 LBS/AC. \\\ EROSION CONTROL BLANKET - BIONET C125BN OR SC150 MNDOT MIXTURE 34-261 RIPARIAN SOUTH & WEST \\\ \\\ HYDROSEEDING SEEDING RATE PLS 31.5 LBS/AC. \\�\ ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH FLATTER THAN 4:1 SLOPE THAT ARE NOT STABILIZED BY SOME \\\ OTHER METHOD SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH PROMATRIX ENGINEERED FIBER MATRIX AND \\\ SEEDED AS SPECIFIED. \\\ EROSION CONTROL PLAN \ \ 1"=30' i i V� I a Know wha 's below. OAK STREET e 30 1po SCALE IN FEET ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-436-4030 PROJECT CATTLE HOUSE RESTAURANT & EVENT CENTER HUGO, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN REVIEW 02/17/2020 ISSUE DATE AMENDED CITY APPLICATION 02/20/2020 CITY COMMENTS 03/02/2020 CITY COMMENTS 1 04/10/2020 D E S I G N Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 www.eIanIab.com f 612.260.7990 C E R T I FICATION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professio eer under the laws of the state,Q y�l A. GONS� Stephen M. Johnston DATE REGISTRATION NO. 18914 01/17/2020 SHEET EROSION CONTROL PLAN C-204 PROJECT NO. ARC19010 Cal before you dig. -� z � B EX. STMH , ° ��L/� N °°° �O� RIM-9V9. 7 /� �'� Ex ce Nv929.�(E) ° AS RIM 934.1 INV-929.6(N) g �j NV=929.6 SUMP=929.4 = _ =ate- - I pN C Ex. CB OVN7-Y RIM-934.3 RECTO NV=929.9 US NAB Rql H/CHWAY IL pqD NO. 6 q (JTH p 6 CONNECT TO EXIST. ^'� _ou C-504 MH WITH INSIDE DROP R Y INV. 924.75 EXISTING 6" STUB WITH EX. CB VALVE --- - NIM_929 2 CONNECT TO EXISTING - -__ �- -_ -� 6" STUB WITH 45d BEND 5 CLEAN OUT / C 504 (TYP) EX. CB , b;� _ _ _ - RIM=932.8 W / / 6 PVC@1%MIN - ___ _ INV=928.6 EX. CB RIM=932.3 CB EX . CLEANOU W= W--�u-������ _ _ _ - INV=928.1 RIM-932 1 1il1�1il� J / - (TYP) INV 929.1 6" 45° BEND -� =ou _ =- _ _ _ _ _ INV= / w / RETAIL / / INV926.35 ! --- - V_ C- TNH W ou _ _ _- -- U-c - FFE 934.1 / EASEMENT &UTILITY - _=-ou RETAIL - --_� / 6"45'BEND �/ ° / --_ / M 6°DIP WM / FDC / 6" X 6" TEE / / PHASE I FFE 933.35 / 6" GATE VALVE 41 / / LOOPED WAERMAIN / HYDRANT 6" GATE VALVE / // M _M / 3 / FDC M 30' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 6" X 4" TEE / Al 4" GATE VALVE 6" GATE VALVE - _ M l WA4 I_ _ _ / FDC / M 6 CONNECT TO EXIST. MH 6" X 4" TEE ' - RETAIL / / C-504 W/ INSIDE DROP INV. 927.45 - / / ADJUST RIM ELEV 935.0 g 4" GATE VALVE 1 FFE 935.4 6rPVC @2% /IN _ - - _ 30' DRAINAGE & UTILITY � EASEMENT / CONNECT TO EXIST. 6 MH WITH INSIDE DROP INV.926.1 C504 RECONSTRUCT MH- - TO ADJUST RE TO 931.4 RECONSTRUCT MH - TO ADJUST RE TO 932.0 WL \ _ _ _ -\ I✓L 4 - W� - \ \ 4'l / holz bL 414 _ �411 \ ' WL \ ` / \ wL I � HWL 928.5 \ EDGE OF DELINEATED WETLAND . EDGE OF ICE MEASURED ON 12-05-19 EGG LAKE ICE ELEVATION = ASSUMED OHWL / OHW=926.62(NAVD88) _ UTILITY NOTES - 1. VERIFY ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITY SERVICES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN LOCATED UTILITIES AND THE EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN SHOULD BE NOTED AND FORWARDED TO THE ENGINEER 2. COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION OF OFFSITE WATERMAIN WITH CITY CONTRACTOR. 3. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE MEANS AND METHODS TO ASSURE ADJACENT PROPERTY IS NOT DAMAGED DURING UTILITY INSTALLATION. 4. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE MEASURED FROM CENTER OF STRUCTURE TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE. 5. UTILITY SERVICE LOCATIONS WITHIN BUILDING ARE SHOWN CORRECT AS OF THE DATE OF THIS PLAN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS BY COMPARING THIS PLAN WITH THE MECHANICAL PLANS PRIOR TO ANY UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. 6. PIPE MATERIALS: (TO BE VERIFIED) WATERMAIN 6" DIP SANITARY SEWER PVC (SCH 40) 7. ALL UTILITY CONSTRUCTION TO CONFORM WITH STATE, CITY ENGINEER'S ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE AND CITY OF HUGO STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 8. ADJUST ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE DISTURBED. COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS TO MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 9. PROVIDE A MINIMUM 7.5' TO A MAXIMUM OF 10' OF COVER OVER ALL NEW WATERMAIN. 10. UTILITY AND MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS MUST COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF ALL WATER AND SEWER PIPES INTO THE BUILDING TO ACCOMMODATE CITY INSPECTION AND TESTING. 11. ALL COMPONENTS OF THE WATER SYSTEM, UP TO THE WATER METER OR FIRE SERVICE EQUIPMENT MUST UTILIZE PROTECTIVE INTERNAL COATINGS MEETING CURRENT ANSI/AWWA STANDARDS FOR CEMENT MORTAR LINING OR SPECIAL COATINGS. THE USE OF UNLINED OR UNCOATED PIPE IS NOT ALLOWED. OVERALL UTILITY PLAN ill =30' 2 PIPE BEDDING / C-504 (TYP) / 20' DRAINAGE & UTILITY 3 HYDRANT EASEMENT (TYP) C-504 / w 6" pIP _MM - GATE VALVE 4 / (TYP) C-504 ' 6" - 45° BEND \ \ 6"X6"TEE / o J 6"X6"TEE 6" GATE VALVE RESTAURANT INV 927 0 \ 6" GATE VALVE CARDEN FFE 933.0 FDC \ POND EASEMENT \e \ 1 18" NYLOPLAST BASIN- 3� C-505 WITH LIGHT DUTY ; L - -` GRATE- _\\ RE930.8 \ \ IE 928.4 WATER SERVICE L� CONNECTION 1 � ° FUTURE EVENT \� 20' DRAINAGE & UTILITY/ \ EASEMENT \ \ \ CENTER 6 - 45° BEND / \ \\ \ FUTURE \ / L INV 928.0 / ` �\\ \ \ DECK �` POND EASEMENT wL�" wL /; 2 `wL \\ \ \ �s 6" DRAINTILE OUTLET \ \ \ \ 1,'� C-505 \ \ x\ UNDER DECK INFILTRATION BASIN BOTTOM 929.E OVERFLOW 930.8 HWL 930.9 I w� \ �� `._s 3► / / 6" - 45° BEND (2) HWL 928.5 EDGE OF DELINEATED WETLAND EDGE OF ICE MEASURED ON 12-05-19 ICE ELEVATION = ASSUMED OHWL CDm C X zz NORTH INFILTRATION BASIN BOTTOM 929.7 OVERFLOW 931.2 HWL 931.3 DRAINAGE & UTILITY \ EASEMENT EX. SMH RIM-933.8 INV-919.0(N/W) ^'V=918.8(SW) CONNECT TO EXISTING 6" DIP - WATERMAIN WITH GATE VALVE • Know what's below. CaII before you dig. OAK STREET 30 CC] SCALE IN FEET ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-436-4030 PROJECT CATTLE HOUSE RESTAURANT & EVENT CENTER HUGO, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN REVIEW oz/17/2020 ISSUE DATE AMENDED CITY APPLICATION 02/20/2020 CITY COMMENTS 03/02/2020 CITY COMMENTS 1 04/10/2020 D E S I G N Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 www.eIanIab.com f 612.260.7990 C E R T I F I C A T 1 0 N I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professio eer under the laws of the stateyQi 11 A. `01 pNS� C Stephen M. Johnston DATE REGISTRATION NO. 18914 01/17/2020 SHEET OVERALL UTILITY PLAN C-301 PROJECT NO. ARC19010 MEN 1 /2"R d �1 �3 °a Ln d d ° d 8" 3"R 1 /2"R SLOPE 314" PER FT. d d d d 12" B612 CURB & GUTTER CURB OPENING 12" 12" d ° d d 4 ° 4 NO SCALE 0040 `' EXPANSION JOINT (BOTH SIDES) NO SCALE NO SCALE CONTROL JOINTS SHALL EXTEND TO BOTH THE FRONT AND BACKS OF THE CURB AND BE 2" DEEP AT 10' MAX SPACING. Do Of m U 6" AT CURB AND GUTTE 20" 26" FOR D412 INTEGRAL VERTICAL CURB & WALK CURB TRANSITION A I UH ULUIML I KY UI- URB AND GUTTER CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER NO SCALE SIGN FACE AT PARKING STALL SYMBOL 6"X6" ALL BARS TO BE 0.25" HIGH BY 8" WIDE NOTE: SIGNAGE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENT OF MN PARKING MUTCD R7-8n AND R7-8P AT ACCESS AISLE VEHICLE ID \ REQUIRED ACCESS AISLE FOR VIOLATION UP TO $200 FINE \ \ NO PARKING ATTACH SIGN TO POST WITH APPROPRIATE STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS, WASHERS & NUTS. (TYP AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF SIGN) VAN ACCESSIBLE WHERE APPLICABLE \ 2"X2" ADJUSTABLE PERFORATED SIGN STOCK SET IN CONCRETE, CENTERED IN BOLLARD 60" FROM PARKING SURFACE SEALANT TO BOTTOM OF SIGNAGE FORM CONCRETE PYRAMID ON TOP 1100, 4X4 SQUARE STEEL PIPE BOLLARD CONCRETE FILLED, PAINTED TO MATCH ARCHITECTURAL TRIM ``4 COLOR M � d PITCH, SMOOTH CONCRETE FINISH FINISHED GRADE d °d d d ° ° 4 d — d d 4 ° d — d — d W — II III —III �I' 20" DIA FOOTING HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN A — DESIRED MINIMUM A I� 3 8' OUTER LIMITS OF 3' 8" o CONCRETE WALK o u u 4' Orr x . 4' 0„ 4' Orr X _ 4r Orr MIN r� 4 0 ~I MIN MIN rF 4' 0" ~I MIN FRONT FACE!— 5 8 5 8 —«{ I'� 5' 8" m 5' 8" OF CURB > > BACK OF W U U CURB U U 5 w r I °°55 `Z W 6 io i+i` + •° o Cn i+)A ° � 2r Or 6„ m 6' 3" (6" CURB) _/2 0 4 W 4' 2" (4" CURB) � 4' 0" MIN. C'� 4 6' 3" (6" CURB) 6' 3" (6" CURB) 4' 0" 6' 3" (6" CURB) VAR. WIDTH CURB 4' 2" (4" CURB) 4' 2" (4" CURB) MINI 4' 2" (4" CURB) A A .--I 5" (0.2") PLAN VIEW OF DIAGONAL RAMP PLAN VIEW OF PERPENDICULAR RAMP CURB OR 6 4" (6" CURB) X=4' 0" DESIREABLE 8 _1 16 CURB & 3" 4" (4" CURB) DOME SECTION GUTTER r------------ ' O 18rr �8rr DOME %• : 0.02 FT/FT MAX. 2 (TYP,) 16 (TYP.) 1 0.08 FT/FT OR FLATTER O 0 0 0000006 000000000045; 2' 0" SECTION A -A 00000000 11 s.. 0000000000MlN. 16 (�rp) 0000000000 ROUND ALL - IF THE PATH OF TRAVEL'X' IS 4FT, OR GREATER, USE INTERSECT ONSLOPED S 0.10 TO 0.08 FT./FT. SLOPE FOR THE FLARED SIDE. T -8" MIN.- IF'X' IS LESS THAN 4 FT, THEN THE FLARED SIDE SLOPE DOME SPACING MUST NOT EXCEED 0.08 FT./FT.. (6" CURB & 0.08 FT/FT SLOPE) 6' 0" (6" CURB & 0.08 FT/FT SLOPE)+ 47' "II 4,2rr (4" CURB & 0.08 FT/FT SLOPE) (4" CURB & 0.08 FT/FT SLOPE) ELEVATION OF RAMP NOTES: TO COMPLY WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), ALL STATE AND LOCAL AGENCIES ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THIS STANDARD DETAIL PLATE. THE CURB AND CURB TRANSITION ON THE RAMP WILL BE PAID FOR AS LINEAR FEET OF CONCRETE CURB OR CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. THE RAMP AREA WILL BE PAID FOR AS CONCRETE WALK EXCLUDING THE TRUNCATED DOME AREA WHICH WILL BE PAID FOR AS TRUNCATED DOMES BY THE SQUARE FOOT. BIKE TRAILS SHALL HAVE TRUNCATED DOMES ACROSS THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF TRAIL WHEN THE TRAIL CROSSES A ROAD. DOMES ARE NOT TO BE USED ON SIDEWALKS OR TRAILS WHEN CROSSING ALLEYS OR DRIVEWAYS. 1. 1/2 INCH PREFORMED JOINT FILLER MATERIAL, AASHTO M 213. 2 WHEN POSSIBLE, PROVIDE: A CLEAR PATH OF TRAVEL 4' 0" WIDE BEHIND THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP. A RELATIVELY FLAT 4' X 4' LANDING WILL ALLOW WHEELCHAIRS TO NAVIGATE AROUND THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP. NO SIGNALS, SIGNS, CABINETS, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS ARE ALLOWED IN THE RAMP OR PATH OF TRAVEL. WHEN A MEDIAN IS NOT WIDE ENOUGH FOR TWO PEDESTRIAN RAMPS AND A 48" LANDING BETWEEN THEM, THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SHALL BE CUT THROUGH THE MEDIAN AT STREET LEVEL. ® PLACE THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS (TRUNCATED DOMES) AT THE BACK OF CURB. WHEN THE DETECTABLE WARNING SYSTEM IS A PRECAST MATERIAL, THE CURB SHALL BE HAND FORMED TO FILL THE GAP. (� ADA REQUIRED TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE 2' 0" MIN. IN DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND SHALL EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH (3' 0" OR 4' 0" TYP.) OF THE CURB RAMP. THIS 2' 0" BY TO" OR 4' 0" WIDTH (TYP.) TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY WITH THE ADJACENT WALKING SURFACE. TRUNCATED DOMES SHALL BE CAST IRON POWDER COATED A LIGHT COLOR (GRAY TYPICALLY) WHEN THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK IS DARK COLOR. TRUNCATED DOMES SHALL BE CAST IRON POWDER COATED A DARK COLOR (RED TYPICALLY) WHEN THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK IS A LIGHT GRAY CEMENT COLOR. © 60" MIN. FOR NEW CONSRUCTION. TO" ALLOWED TO STAY IN PLACE FOR RETROFIT PROJECTS. IN SITUATIONS WHERE THE CURB CUT WIDTH EXCEEDS 4' 0", THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH. 6, 6" X 18" CONCRETE SIDE WALL ° d 2N 6" WEATHER TREATED, VERTICAL GRAIN > d CEDAR WITH ANCHORS 18" OC. m ° D JOINT � XGRASS SYNTHETIC TURF FOR BOCCE `TOP DRESSING (GREEN/BLACK MIX) WEMENT / XGRASS TILE =CTION df0=0=� COMPACTED STONE BASE 1 _� GEOTEXTILE NO SCALE CONCRETE OR ASPHALT BASE COMPACTED SOIL INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. BOCCE BALL COURT �� FIRE PIT Special Details y OF PEDESTRIAN Date: � II 04-01-15 0 CURB RAMP HU-STR-3 Revised: x:St': �90E 01-20-17 NO SCALE NO SCALE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP FOLLOW MNDOT STANDARD PLAN 5-297-250 FOR RAMPS IN MNDOT RIGHT-OF-WAY NOTES: 1. ALL CONCRETE, MATCH POINTS SHALL BE SAW CUT AND HAVE EXPANSION PAD UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER 2. ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A SLUMP OF 3" OR LESS, A 7-DAY STRENGTH OF AT LEAST 2,000 PSI AND A 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3,900 PSI 3. ALL BITUMINOUS MATCH POINTS SHALL BE SAW CUT OR MILLED AND TACKED PRIOR TO PATCHING. ON ROADS WERE BITUMINOUS IS 3" THICK OR GREATER THE TOP 1.5" SHALL BE MILLED A MINIMUM OF 18" BEYOND THE SAW CUT AS A MATCH POINT. 4. GRAVEL AND BITUMINOUS IN ROADWAY AREA SHALL BE REPAIRED TO A LIKE NEW CONDITION MATCHING EXISTING THICKNESS. 5. BITUMINOUS PATCH WORK DONE PRIOR TO JUNE 1ST AND AFTER SEPTEMBER 30TH SHALL BE HEATED WITH A RADIANT HEATER TO SEAL THE EDGES. 6. ALL DRIVEWAYS WITH A GRADER GREATER THEN 10% MUST OBTAIN CITY ENGINEER APPROVAL. 7. ALL DRIVEWAYS MUST MEET CITY CODE FOR LOT COVERAGE AREA. B. NO DRIVEWAY SHALL BE WITHIN 40' OF A STREET END RADIUS UNLESS WRITTEN APPROVAL IS OBTAINED FROM THE CITY ENGINEER. 9. WHERE SIDEWALKS / TRAILS EXISTS OR ARE PROPOSED, THE DRIVEWAY SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE SIDEWALK / TRAIL AREA WITH PEDESTRIAN CURB OPENINGS PLACED (SEE MNDOT PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS). A MAXIMUM 2% CROSS SLOPE ON SIDEWALK / TRAIL AREAS CROSSING THROUGH DRIVEWAYS. 10. CONTRACTOR TO CALL CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (651) 762-6316 PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. FELT EXPANSION PAD 18" MIN. CONCRETE CURES & GUTTER 2' MIN. —� CURB RADIUS 25' BACK OF CURB TYPICAL FELT EXPANSION PAD MAINTAIN GUTTER WITH 3/4" LIP ALONG WIDTH OF DRIVEWAY OPENING. SAW CUT EXISTING BITUMINOUS MILLED AREA 24" MIND RADIANT HEAT PATCH AREA ON ALL PATCHES PLACED PRIOR TO JUNE 1ST OR AFTER SEPTEMBER 30TH 6" CONCRETE PAVEMENT (3F52A) VARIES CROSS SLOPE WHEN SIDEWALK /TRAIL DRIVEWAY SLOPE .�.-• CROSSES DRIVEWAY Y4' PER FOOT 3/4"LIP .'s' e.. P. :.s.•�=.. s STREET PATCH 2' BY LENGTH OF CURBING REMOVED AND REPLACED (MATCH EXISTING THICKNESS) 6" CLASS 5 OR SALVAGED/RECYCLED MATERIAL MEETING CLASS 5 GRADATION (MnDOT 3138) CONTRACTION JOINT SIDEWALK CROSSING ONLY SAWED OR PREFORMED CITY OF Special Details �r COMMERCIAL/MULTI FAMILY Date: 04 01 15 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY DETAIL HU-STR-15 JGO Revised: r EST. isos 03-12-20 COMMERCIAL CONCRETE DRIVEWAY NO SCALE \ " / N M 12" 1" CHAMFER (TYPICAL) ° N 3/4"0 x 3'-O" ANCHOR RODS 2 PER CURB 445 BARS PRECAST CONCRETE a N H PRECAST CONCRETE WHEEL STOP NO SCALE NO SCALE ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-436-4030 PROJECT CATTLE HOUSE RESTAURANT & EVENT CENTER HUGO, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN REVIEW 02/17/2020 ISSUE DATE AMENDED CITY APPLICATION 02/20/2020 CITY COMMENTS 03/02/2020 CITY COMMENTS 1 04/10/2020 D E S I G N Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 www.eIanIab.com f 612.260.7990 C E R T I F I C A T 1 0 N I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professio eer under the laws of the stateyQill A. `OA` N �v�� ONS� C Stephen M. Johnston DATE REGISTRATION NO. 18914 01/17/2020 SHEET DETAILS C-501 PROJECT NO. ARC19010 SWERVE RACK Submittal Sheet 3.0" POROUS ASPHALTIC CONCRETE 1.0" CHOKER COURSE, WASHED NO.57 STONE 8.0" CLEAN, WASHED CRUSHED STONE AGGREGATE, MNDOT CLASS A OR B COARSE AGGREGATE, MIN. 80% CRUSHED SCARIFY SUBGRADE TO DEPTH OF 12" AND TOLERANCE WITH EQUIPMENT THAT IMPARTS MINIMAL LOAD POROUS PAVEMENT SECTION I/I111►1:7E1►17�]:ZyErZK�71[y:7■1■�\�/q � IE►11 3" AGGREGATE BASE ;MNDOT 3138 CL5) COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION NO SCALE NO SCALE 2.0" TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE MIXTURE (2,B) SPWEA240B (PG 58-26), MNDOT 2360 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 2.0" TYPE SP 12.5 BITUMINOUS NON -WEAR COURSE MIXTURE (2,B) SPWEB230B (PG58-28), MNDOT 2360 8" AGGREGATE BASE (MNDOT 3138 CL5) COMPACTED SUBGRADE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION L SEE TABLE 1 DOWELED CONSTRUCTION JOINT USE WHERE CONCRETE PLACEMENT OPERATIONS STOP FOR MORE THAN 30 MINUTES, END FOR THE DAY, OR WHERE CAST AGAINST PREVIOUSLY PLACED OR EXISTING CONCRETE. BUILDING OR STRUCTURE 3/4" M JOINT SEALER ° 4 / d I- d < d d d d 6'-0" JOINT FILLER N ISOLATION JOINT USE AGAINST BUILDINGS OR OTHER STRUCTURES TABLE 1: DOWEL SIZING CHART PAVEMENT THICKNESS (in) MAXIMUM DOWEL SPACING MINIMUM DOWEL LENGTH MINIMUM DOWEL DIAMETER LESS THAN 8 12" 16" 0.75" TABLE 2: JOINT SPACING CONCRETE PAVEMENT THICKNESS MAXIMUM JOINT SPACING 5" 10, JOINT SEALER CONTINUE REINFORCING THROUGH JOINT d d < ° < < d < d < CONTRACTION JOINT MAX. CONTRACTION JOINT SPACING SEE TABLE 2 CONCRETE PAVEMENT JOINT NO SCALE PROPERTY LINE 0.511 8' 0.51 CI OPP 1IA" PPP Pii Tn nPAlA1 3" TYPE 9.5 WEAR COURSE MIX (2,B) (SPWEA240B) 6" CLASS 5 OR SALVAGED/RECYCLED MATERIAL MEETING CLASS 5 GRADATION (MnDOT 3138) GEOTEXTILE FABRIC FOR ROOT CONTROL TO BE PLACED UNDER CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BIKE PATH TYPICAL SECTION 0.5' 5" SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT TO DRAIN PROPERTY LINE 0.5' l -6" CONCRETE (3F52A) CLASS 5 OR SALVAGED/RECYCLED MATERIAL MEETING CLASS 5 GRADATION (MnDOT 3138) SIDEWALK TYPICAL SECTION Special Details /r CIT-Y OF BIKE PATH AND Dale: 04 01-15 Revised: SIDEWALK TYPICAL SECTIONS HU-STR-17 r EST.1906 03-12-20 _�L / CONCRETE BIKE PATH & SIDEWALK SECTIONS NO SCALE Special Details �CITY OF TYPICAL TRAIL Date: 04 01-15 JGO SECTION HU-STR-18 Revised: r EST.1906 03-12-20 CONTRACTION JOINT CONSTRUCTION JOINT ISOLATION/EXPANSION JOINT PAVEMENT PAVEMENT r_ W 3/4" r- -� PAVEMENT SURFACE SURFACE -i SURFACE Q p p: o 00 0 0o p. o 00 ° JOINT SEALER o ° JOINT SEALER ° ° JOINT D:o D:o �o SEALER o oD. oD. o otx oD. o oD: oD: BACKER �. BACKER �. BACKER ° MATERIAL o ° ° MATERIAL o ° ° MATERIAL 4Y. D:o. p D:o. D. o o�A A �. D. o A A� o D P o o D Pp pDa' A o D15 a. .. a. .. o D. JOINT BOTTOM INITIAL SAWCUT (1/8") BUTTED JOINT ts OR INSERT o .o " CRACK o o W = WIDTH OF SEALANT RESERVOIR (1/2" (MIN), 5/8" (MAX)) p: D. p JOINT FILLER D = DEPTH OF SEALANT (1.0 TO 1.5W) o 17. In, o 15 T = 1/4 SLAB THICKNESS �. d NOTE: 1. TOP OF SEALANT WILL BE 1/8" TO 1/4" BELOW TOP OF PAVEMENT 3/4" j SURFACE FOR EXTERIOR PAVEMENTS JOINT SEALANT •d a d _ ° ° ° m rl 1/4"R d a o C) D-1 (Y ° d w U_ ° d ° TOOLED CONTROL JOINT SPACING: 5' WALK 5' C/C 6' WALK 6' C/C JOINT SEALER N d d d° ° Y d /4"R ° d d o a ¢LU ° d d C LU Cn a ° ° EXPANSION JOINT NON BITUMINOUS JOINT FILLER MAXIMUM SPACING 100'. ALSO USE WHEN ABUTTING BUILDINGS. SIDEWALK JOINT NO SCALE NO SCALE TRAIL SECTION NO SCALE 34' 44" IN -GROUND IN -GROUND MOUNT �12� 2I ` b. SURFACE MOUNT EE1118" 110" s GEF?O A PLAYcaRE o oe CAPACITY 2 Bikes MATERIALS ❑X Standard 1.9" OD schedule 40 pipe ❑ Lightweight 1.9" OD schedule 10 pipe FINISHES Galvanized An after fabrication hot dipped galvanized finish is our standard option. 250 TGIC powder coat colors, thermoplastic coating, PVC dip, and stainless steel finishes are also available as alternate options. Powder Coat Our powder coat finish assures a high level of adhesion and durability by following these steps: 1. Sandblast 2. Epoxy primer electrostatically applied 3. Final thick TGIC polyester powder coat Stainless Stainless Steel: 304 grade stainless steel material finished in either a high polished shine or a satin finish. MOUNT ❑X In -ground OPTIONS In ground mount is embedded into concrete base. Specify in ground mount for this option. ❑ Surface Foot Mount has two 2.5"x6"x.25" feet with two anchors per foot. Specify foot mount for this option. Rail Rail Mounted Swerve Racks are bolted to two parallel rails which can be left freestanding or anchored to the ground. Rails are heavy duty 3"A.4"x3/16" thick galvanized mounting rails. Specify rail mount for this option. www.dero.com 1 1-888-337-6729 © 2018 Di BIKE RACK NO SCALE 2'-11" 1 sPE�tFreATtoN 1. STEEL REINFORCED, COLD JOINT SECURED MONOLITHIC CONCRETE STRUCTURES (INLET 875 LBS, MIDDLE 965 LBS, AND OUTLET 730 LBS). CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 4,000 PSI AT 28 DAYS. CONCRETE AIR ENTRAINED (4% l5 TO 8% BY VOLUME). MANUFACTURED AND DESIGNED TO ASTM C858. 2. 2-POINT PICK USING RECESSED LIFTING POCKETS WITH A Z OUTLE� MIDDLE INLET, STANDARD HOOK. to �? 1-- 3. FIBERGLASS GRATE (11 LBS/PIECE). OUTLET N N, 3D VIE 4. FRP COMPOSITE LID (38 LBS/PIECE) WITH CONCENTRATED LOAD CAPACITY OF 11.200 LBS. OUTLETMIDDLE INLET, 2' 1" INSTALLATION NOTES 7J - 1. INSTALL A CLASS 5 BASE (COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD 2.7^ 2'-1" PROCTOR). THE DISTANCE FROM THE BACK OF THE CURB MAY VARY if A - A' ^ 1'-10" ^ BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS. EXCAVATE 1' 7" BELOW THE GUTTERLINE ELEVATION (I.E. THE BIORETENTION OVERFLOW 2'-11" ELEVATION) TO ACCOMMODATE THE 9" PONDING - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - DEPTH, 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE, AND 4" RAIN GUARDIAN FOXHOLE BASE (INCLUDED). THEREFORE, THE TOP OF THE 2'-11" 2'-11" 2'-11" CLASS 5 COMPACTED BASE IS PRECISELY 1' 1" BELOW THE END A -A' VIEW GUTTERLINE ELEVATION. THE TOP OF THE RAIN GUARDIAN FOXHOLE INLET POINT WILL BE 7-1/2. ABOVE THE TOP OF THE CONCRETE BASE FRP COMPOSITE LID FRP COMPOSITE LID AND 1-1/2' BELOW THE GUTTERLINE ELEVATION TO ACCOMMODATE A in in SLOPED INLET FROM THE GUTTER TO THE RAIN GUARDIAN FOXHOLE. cj 4 MIDDLE N "' t., REMOVABLE FILTER WALL -►� FIBERGLASS GRATE FIBERGLASS GRATE 111 2. SET RAIN GUARDIAN FOXHOLE INLET FIRST, FOLLOWED BY MIDDLE SECTION(S). AND FINALLY THE OUTLET ON THE PREPARED CLASS 5 r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BASE. POSITION RAIN GUARDIAN FOXHOLE OUTLET PIECE SO PRIMARY OUTLET ALIGNS WITH TOE OF BASIN SIDE SLOPE TO AVOID ;- i r--------------- SOIL INTERFERENCE WITH REMOVABLE FILTER WALL. 2•_7^ F _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 3. SECURE MODULAR FOXHOLE PIECES AT EACH JOINT USING I I p A ' PROVIDED GALVANIZED TIE RODS. T-11" 2'-6" T-0.5" 2'-8.25" 4. INSTALL EXPANSION/CONTRACTION JOINT MATERIAL OR A SHEET ELEVATION VIEW OF POLY TO SERVE AS A BOND BREAK BETWEEN RAIN GUARDIAN FOXHOLE AND CONCRETE INLET BEFORE POURING INLET. 5. REMOVABLE FILTER WALL SHOULD BE INSTALLED WITH FILTER ........... FABRIC FACING THE RAIN GUARDIAN FOXHOLE INLET. in N- SIDEWALK .,., ., ., .,. INLET:._..:.:.,. :.:.:.:..:..: ----------- N •CURB TIE GUTTER --------------- 1'---- 2' 1" • `a IIII=IIII GUTTER • -IIII �� =III CLASS 5 AGGREGATE 2-11. =IIII -IIII-IIII-IIII-IIII-IIII =IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII�1-1 IIIIIIISUBSOILSIIIIIII I I p P IIII_IIII_IIII_IIII_IIII_IIII_IIII_IIII_IIII_IIII_IIII_IIII_IIII_IIII_IIII_IIII III IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII-IIII=IIII=IIII-IIII FOXHOLE COULD ALSO BE INSTALLED BEHIND CURB-' =IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=1 MANUFACTURED BY: I■• EORTERRA PLAN VIEW INSTALLED PLAN VIEW - INLET ONLY INSTALLED ELEVATION VIEW - INLET/OUTLET ONLY Structural & Specialty RAIN GUARDIAN FOXHOLE REVISION HISTORY AK6XA REM 13V DAT D-ES-C-FUMT-10N N 1ARDIAN PRETREATMENT CHAMBER 'RUAnNMODULAR 1 0,11,. F ISTUTlidff ism" 1°" 1 BIORETENTION PONDING DEPTH: 9" Anoka Conservation District 1318 McKay Dr. NE, Suite 300 PRETREATMENT FOR BIORETENTaN TYPICAL DETAIL Ham Lake, MN 55304 763-434-2030 scA vARus� Ram Gardens • S.ialcs • Rttration Basins • InldlraUon Basins U.S. PATENTi NOS. 0 501,010 AND 6,855,50/ j RAIN GUARDIAN FOXHOLE NO SCALE ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-436-4030 PROJECT CATTLE HOUSE RESTAURANT & EVENT CENTER HUGO, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN REVIEW 02/17/2020 ISSUE DATE AMENDED CITY APPLICATION 02/20/2020 CITY COMMENTS 03/02/2020 CITY COMMENTS 1 04/10/2020 D E S I G N Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 www.elanlab.com C E R T I F I C A T 1 0 N I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professio eer under the laws of the stat 1^�II A. O\�� N` ` ``� c �pN Stephen M. Johnston DATE REGISTRATION IN 18914 01/17/2020 SHEET DETAILS C-502 PROJECT NO. ARC19010 NOTE: ONE CUBIC APPROXIMi A L DIA. 3" LEAF COMPOST (MNDOT GRADE 2) ROTOTILLED TOPSOIL &GENERAL 8" INTO SAND TO 18" ABOVE BOTTOM OF BASIN ROADSIDE SEEDING NATIVE SOIL (ASSUME INFILTRATION RATE 0.8" SEE SHEET C-201 PER HOUR) REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY FINE GRAINED SOILS ENCOUNTERED TO A DEPTH 4 (MAX) OF T BELOW THE SURFACE OF THE BASIN O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 1�1 I em . INFILTRATION CONSTRUCTION L MINIMUM 4" TOPSOIL STORMWATER SEEDING SEE SHEET C-201 NO SCALE 1' (12"-27" DIA. PIPE) 1.5' (30" AND LARGER PIPE) RIPRAP r—yOo w —) �a NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SECTION B-B TIE THE LAST 6 JOINTS ON INLET AND OUTLET PIPES AND BED IN GRANULAR MATERIAL. ANY COVER LESS THAN 2' OVER TOP OF PIPE SHALL BE GRANULAR MATERIAL RIPRAP 1' (12"-27" DIA. PIPE) �1.5' (30" AND LARGER PIPE) NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC EXTEND 1' UNDER FES MINIMUM RIPRAP REQUIRED DIA. OF PIPE (IN.) L (FT.) QUANTITY (C.Y.) CLASS 12 8 5 III 15 8 5 III 18 10 6 III 24 12 8 III 30 14 12 III 36 16 14 III 42 18 22 IV 48 20 26 1 IV >48 22-28 1 30-40 1 IV RIPRAP SPILLWAY DEFLECTOR PLATE OVERFLOW 1 - CENTER OF FILTER ASSEMBLY OVERFLOW 2 - TOP OF CURB BOX 10" FILTER ASSEMBLY CURB CG-23 HIGH -FLOW HIGH -FLOW FABRIC NOTES: 1. THE ROAD DRAIN -CURB & GUTTER MODEL CONSISTS OF A REUSABLE OPEN TOPPED RECEPTACLE THAT SETS INSIDE THE STORM SEWER GRATE. AN INCORPORATION REAR DEFLECTOR PLATE IS CONNECTED TO THE RECEPTACLE DIRECTING THE WATER INTO THE BASIN FOR FILTRATION. 2. THE ROAD DRAIN -CURB & GUTTER MODEL HAS A REPLACEABLE FILTER CARTRIDGE. 3. THE FILTER MEDIA SHALL MEET ALL LOCAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR INLET PROTECTION. MAINTENANCE: 1. CHECK FILTER MEDIA AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT. CLEAN OR REPLACE IF SEDIMENT CLOGS FILTER. 2. REMOVE SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS FROM THE RECEPTACLE AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT. Ct- r-Y EST, f9061. WIMCO CURB & GUTTER INLET PROTECTION (CG23) INLET PROTECTION Special Details Date: 04-01-15 Revised: H U-EC-4 03-12-20 NO SCALE NO SCALE STEEL FENCE POST (T-POST), MINIMUM 5' LONG, 6' MAXIMUM SPACING. POST NOTCHES TO FACE AWAY FROM FABRIC. DIRECTIOt4 OF SURFACE FLOW ATTACH FABRIC TO POSTS WITH MINIMUM 3 ZIP TIES (50 LB. TENSILE) PER POST IN TOP 8" OF FABRIC. MONOFILAMENT GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PER MNDOT TABLE 3886-1 (MACHINE SLICED). MACHINE SLICE \ 8"-12" DEPTH (PLUS 6" FLAP) .. 0 24" MINIMUM POST EMBEDMENT NOTE: THE MACHINE SLICED METHOD (THIS DETAIL) IS THE STANDARD SILT FENCE INSTALLATION METHOD. HEAVY-DUTY (ERO-1B) OR STANDARD (ERO-1C) SILT FENCE INSTALLATION METHODS SHOULD ONLY BE USED WHEN APPROVED OR DIRECTED BY THE CITY. AO COMPACTION: AFTER "SLICING" IN THE FABRIC AND BEFORE INSTALLATION OF STEEL POSTS, DRIVE INSTALLATION EQUIPMENT OVER THE "SLICE" WHILE FABRIC IS LAYING ON THE GROUND. THEN INSTALL STEEL POSTS AND PULL UP FABRIC TO ATTACH AT A UNIFORM HEIGHT. ChT'Y CdF Special Details SILT FENCE MACHINE SLICED Date: GO 09-01-15 Revised: H U-EC-2 R. EST. t906 03-12-20 NOTES: 1. APPLY LIME, FERTILIZER AND SEED BEFORE LAYING THE NET OR MAT. 2. START LAYING THE NET FROM THE TOP OF THE CHANNEL OR SLOPE AND UNROLL IT DOWN THE GRADE. ALLOW NETTING TO LAY LOOSELY ON THE SOIL BUT WITHOUT WRINKLES - DO NOT STRETCH. MAT OR BLANKET - TYPE PRODUCT SHOULD PROVIDE AT LEAST 30% COVERAGE OF THE SURFACE WHERE IT IS APPLIED. 3. TO SECURE THE NET, BURY THE UPSLOPE END IN A SLOT OR TRENCH NO LESS THAN 6 INCHES DEEP, COVER WITH SOIL, AND TAMP FIRMLY AS SHOWN. STAPLE THE NET EVERY 12 INCHES ACROSS THE TOP END AND EVERY 3 FOOT AROUND THE EDGES AND BOTTOM. WHERE 2 STRIPS OF NET ARE LAID SIDE BY SIDE, THE ADJACENT EDGES SHOULD BE OVERLAPPED 3 INCHES AND STAPLED TOGETHER. EACH STRIP OF NETTING SHOULD ALSO BE STAPLED DOWN THE CENTER, EVERY 3 FOOT. DO NOT STRETCH THE NET WHEN APPLYING STAPLES. 4. TO JOIN TWO STRIPS, CUT A TRENCH AND ANCHOR THE END OF THE NEW NET. OVERLAP THE END OF THE PREVIOUS ROLL 18 INCHES, AS SHOWN, AND STAPLE EVERY 12 INCHES JUST BELOW THE ANCHOR SLOT. MAINTENANCE: INSPECT ALL MULCHES PERIODICALLY, AFTER RAINSTORMS TO CHECK FOR RILL EROSION, DISLOCATION, OR FAILURE. WHEN EROSION IS OBSERVED, APPLY ADDITIONAL MULCH. IF WASHOUT OCCURS, REPAIR THE SLOPE GRADE, RESEED, AND REINSTALL MULCH. CONTINUE INSPECTIONS UNTIL VEGETATION IS FIRMLY ESTABLISHED. TYPICAL STAPLES #8 FLOW GAUGE WIRE 10" lft, A. BURY THE TOP END OF THE MATTING STRIPS IN A TRENCH 6 INCHES OR 1 1/2" 1 MORE IN DEPTH. PRESS ENDS 6 INCHES INTO THE SOIL AROUND STRUCTURES AND STAPLE SECURELY WHEN USING NETTING IN CHANNELS, ROLL OUT STRIPS OF NETTING PARALLEL TO THE DIRECTION OF FLOW AND OVER THE PROTECTIVE MULCH. ,ITI IL — FLOW Ill, B. TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL. dL _ SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES, 10 INCH � W SPACING, 4 INCHES DOWN FROM THE — - TRENCH. FLOW C. OVERLAP - BURY UPPER END OF LOWER STRIP AS IN "A" AND "B". OVERLAP END OF TOP STRIP 18 INCHES AND STAPLE. FLOW �jlk Ill, I& EROSION CONTROL BLANKET D. EROSION STOP - FOLD OF MATTING BURIED IN SLIT TRENCH AND TAMPED DOUBLE ROW OF STAPLES. NO SCALE SILT FENCE 6-FT. HIGH TEMPORARY ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCE SHALL BE PLACED AT THE DRIPLINE OF THE TREE TO BE SAVED. FENCE SHALL COMPLETELY ENCIRCLE THE TREE(S) INSTALL FENCE POSTS USING PIER BLOCKS ONLY. AVOID DRIVING POSTS OR STAKES INTO MAJOR ROOTS. FOR ROOTS OVER 1-IN DIA. THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION, MAKE A CLEAN, STRAIGHT CUT TO REMOVE THE DAMAGED PORTION. ALL EXPOSED ROOTS SHALL BE TEMPORARILY COVERED WITH DAMP BURLAP TO PREVENT DRYING, AND SHALL BE COVERED WITH SOIL AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. WORK WITHIN PROTECTION FENCE SHALL BE DONE MANUALLY. NO STOCKPILING OF MATERIALS, VEHICULAR TRAFFIC, OR STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT OR MACHINERY SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE LIMIT OF THE FENCING. TREE PROTECTION FENCE 30 DEGREES MAX. O U_ z CONTOURS w ¢ w J15 - CATCHMENT AREA <0.25 ACRES N D=10' R=15' w o of J25 - CATCHMENT AREA >0.25 ACRES D=16' R=25' o� NO SCALE UP -GRADIENT SILT FENCE AND J-HOOK ARE ONE CONTINUOUS LINE START DOWN -GRADIENT SILT FENCE AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO THE UP -GRADIENT J-HOOK J-HOOK SILT FENCE LT41►1 NO SCALE 20' RADIUS MINIMUM 20' RADIUS MINIMUM / PGA �P�O ELOpO 1" TO 2" CRUSHED ROCK 6" MIN. DEPTH NOTES: 1. CRUSHED CONCRETE IS NOT ALLOWED 2. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC REQUIRED UNDERNEATH COARSE AGGREGATE 3. MAINTENANCE IS INCIDENTAL o/RAC' eYF,� Rqs�, G7NF�R �\00�t� 2a �r CITY OF Special Details ROCK CONSTRUCTION Date: 04 01-15 \ ENTRANCE HU-EC-1 Revised: \ ST. iso6 03-12-20 / 10'0" ss» rrilv vUa111111i v a%alumuiu. -ry rlr` ALTERNATE - RUMBLE RACKS SIDE BY SIDE INSTALLATION \ q\D wy.rr.,, / 11 nro r...e II ii t1 Y.aM . P For Side By Side Installations (i.e. (2) mats wide at the entrance, use short -straps to connect mats as shown in diagram. Contact your distributor or FODS with any additional questions. FODS MAT ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NO SCALE ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-436-4030 PROJECT CATTLE HOUSE RESTAURANT & EVENT CENTER HUGO, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN REVIEW 02/17/2020 ISSUE DATE AMENDED CITY APPLICATION 02/20/2020 CITY COMMENTS 03/02/2020 CITY COMMENTS 1 04/10/2020 D E S I G N Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 www.elanlab.com f 612.260.7990 C E R T I FICAT10N I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professio eer under the laws of the stated A. `O� NU ` 30 ONAc C Stephen M. Johnston DATE REGISTRATION NO. 18914 01/17/2020 SHEET DETAILS C-503 PROJECT NO. ARC19010 GENERAL NOTES: BEDDING THICKNESS t=Do/24, BUT NOT LESS THAN 3" IN ROCK t=Do/12, BUT NOT LESS THAN 6" IF UNSTABLE TRENCH BOTTOM SUBGRADE CONDITIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED, ADDITIONAL CRUSHED ROCK FOR BEDDING AND EXTENT SHALL BE AS DIRECTED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. TRENCH SHALL BE BRACED, SHEETED OR SLOPED AS NECESSARY FOR THE SAFETY OF WORKMEN AND PROTECTION OF OTHER UTILITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: 1. PLACE BEDDING MATERIAL. SHAPE TO MATCH PIPE, REMOVE MATERIAL FOR BELLS -� 2. COMPACT OUTER BEDDING - 3. INSTALL PIPE TO LINE AND GRADE 4. PLACE AND COMPACT THE HAUNCH AREA TO SPRINGLINE 5. COMPLETE BACKFILL TO SPECIFICATIONS. z_ TRENCH BACKFILL ENGINEERED FILL: SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR MATERIAL AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS OUTLET NOZZLES & THREADS: TWO 2-1/2" HOSE CONNECTION AND ONE 4-1/2" PUMPER CONNECTION. (NATIONAL STANDARD THREADS) 5 CAPS TO BE CHAINED (PENTAGON NUT ON CAPS) VALVE BOX AS SPECIFIED "HYDRAFINDER" (CANDYCANE) FIRE HYDRANTLOCATOR WATEROUS WB-250 AS SPECIFIED BURY 8.0' 18"-24" 1 Li I I I RN I 1" MIN. 2" MAX. HAUNCHING AND INITIAL Do BACKFILL: ENGINEERED FILL 1" 2'-6" MAX. PARTICLE DIA. _ GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MnDOT 3733 TYPE 3 BEDDING MATERIAL Do/6 MIDDLE BEDDING 12"MIN 7'-6" 1" WASHED COARSE PLACED LOOSELY P:l N BONNET GRAVEL OR CRUSHED STREET, ADAPTOR ROCK TO 6" ABOVE WASTE OPENING MIN.1/3 CY CONCRETE/DUCTILE IRON PIPE BEDDING VARIES' NO SCALE r / I -"_: ._:�S�i"' BRACING AS REQUIRED ' '"'E ^� TRENCH PVC/HDPE PIPE BEDDING ENGINEERED FILL: SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR BACKFILL AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERED FILL: 1" MAX PARTICLE SIZE. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR BACKFILL AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS BEDDING MATERIAL (SEE SPECS) SHAPE TRENCH TO MATCH BELL SECTIONS BEDDING MATERIAL (SEE SPECS) LINE OF BEDDING IN ROCK (8" SAND BASE IN ROCK FOUNDATION) NO SCALE INN I /ALL Mt APPRC NOTES: P.V.0 1. PAID AS CLEANOUT (EACH) AND INCLUDES INSTALLATION OF ALL MATERIALS FROM (AND INCLUDING) THE SERVICE WYE UP TO (AND INCLUDING) THE METER BOX AND COVER. ALL NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE CLEANOUT BID ITEM. 2. INSTALL EVERY 100 FEET OR AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER 3. BENDS AND RISERS TO BE THE SAME SIZE AS SERVICE PIPE. / Special Details CITY OF SANITARY SEWER Date: 04-01-15 JGO SERVICE CLEANOUT Revised: HU-SS-3 03-12-2020 6" D.I.P. WATERMAIN PRECAST CONCRETE BLOCK 8"x8"x16" s PRECAST CONCRETE BASE AS SPECIFIED 2' DIAMETER BY 3' DEEP PIT UNDER HYDRANT FILLED WITH GRAVEL FOR ALL INSTALLATIONS. NOTES: 1. HYDRANT COATINGS DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED AFTER THE BASE COURSE OF BITUMINOUS IS INSTALLED. PRIME AND PAINT HYDRANTS PER AWWA AND MANUFACTURER'S STANDARDS. 2. ALL HYDRANT LEADS SHALL BE TIED WITH 3/4" TIE RODS. TIE ROD SHALL EXTEND FROM TEE TO VALVE AND VALVE TO HYDRANT. MEGA LUGS MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF TIED RODS. 3. HYDRANTS SHALL HAVE A 16" BREAK OFF TRAFFIC FLANGE 4. ALL RODS AND RETAINERS TO BE COATED WITH BITUMASTIC. 5. RED OR YELLOW "OUT OF ORDER" TAG TO BE INSTALLED ON THE PUMPER CONNECTIONS AFTER BACKFILL 6. THE INITIAL & FINAL RAISING OF VALVE BOXES SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJECT. 7. ALL WATERMAIN BOLTS SHALL BE STAINLESS OR COR-BLUE OR APPROVED EQUAL. / CITY OF Special Details TYPICAL HYDRANT Date: 04 01-15 1WG0 INSTALLATION H U-W-1 Revised: EST. 1906 03-12-20 3 HYDRANT NO SCALE PREDL LOGO RAISED IMAGE 48" DIA. �► A L►A SDR 26 PVC PIPE DIMENSION SPECIFICATIONS SIZE INCH mm O.D. INCH mm I.D. INCH mm WALL THICKNESS INCH mm 6" 152.40 6.275 159.38 5.793 147.142 0.241 6.121 81t203.20 8.400 213:36 7.754 196.952 0.323 8.204 10"ff4.00 10.500 266.70 9.692 246.177 0.404 10.262 12" 12.500 317.50 11.538 293.065 0.481 12.217 15" 15.300 388.62 14.124 358.750 0.588 14.935 SDR 35 PVC PIPE DIMENSION SPECIFICATIONS SIZE INCH mm O.D. INCH mm I.D. INCH mm WALL THICKNESS INCH mm 4" 101.60 4.215 107.06 3.975 100.965 0.120 3.048 6" 152.40 6.275 159.38 5.915 150.241 0.180 4.572 81, 203.20 8.400 213.36 7.920 201.128 0.240 6.096 10" 254.00 10.500 266.70 9.900 251.460 0.300 7.620 12" 304.80 12.500 4 317.50 11.7804 299.212 0.360 4 9.144 15" 381.00 15.300 388.62 14.426 366.420 0.437 11.100 SECTION A -A N.T.S. DETAIL B GASKET N.T.S. PREDL TYPE 300 - INSIDE DROP CAP SPIGOT END 6" INSIDE DROP PIPE (LENGTH TO SLID) SPIGOT END 6" 451 ELBOW - INSIDE DROP ASSEMBLY DETAIL N.T.S. PREDL INSIDE DROP TYPE 300 - FOR 1350mm FULLY LINED PRECAST MANHOLE systems 7520 Conrad Street Burnaby, B.C. V5A 2H7 Phone : 604 415-9944 Fax : 604 415-9954 DRAWN BY: DATE DRAWN: R.H. JAN.17/12 APPROVED: REVISION: NO: DATE: LOAD RATING SEE DWG. NO. 19 SPECIFIED FOR: DESCRIPTION: PREDL INSIDE DROP TYPE 300 - FOR 1350mm FULLY LINED PRECAST MANHOLE DWG. NO. REV. NO. 8 CATALOG NUMBER: VALVE BOX SETTING TO BE 1/4"-3/8" BELOW PAVEMENT AND AT GRADE IN TURF AREAS VALVE BOX SHALL BE SET TO HAVE 6" ADJUSTMENT UP AND DOWN FROM FINISH GRADE VALVE BOX TYLER 6860 SERIES AGGREGATE AND MnDOT 3733 TYPE 3 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC LINING DRAIN PIT AND ATTACHED TO TOP OF VALVE BOX FOOT PIECE D.I.P. WATERMAIN GATE VALVE ADAPTOR: 1/4" STEEL WITH PROTECTIVE COATING 3/4" RUBBER GASKET INSTALLED BETWEEN GATE VALVE AND ADAPTOR 11 _ SIDE VIEW . 11 LID SHALL BE LABELED IN RAISED LETTERS "WATER" T-6" COVER MIN. BASE ADAPTOR ADAPTOR, INC TIE RODS J f� GATE VALVE t�`� i • ` '1 K®r ` r' 8"x13"x5" MANHOLE BLOCK 1" WASHED COARSE GRAVEL OR CRUSHED ROCK TO 6" ABOVE NOTES: WASTE OPENING MIN. 3 CY 1. GATE VALVES SHOULD BE USED ON 6" THROUGH 16" WATERMAIN. 2. VALVE BOX INSERTS ARE NOT ALLOWED UNLESS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 3. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED PLUMB AND SHALL ALLOW A 4" P.V.C. PIPE TO PASS ENTIRELY OVER THE GATE VALVE NUT AFTER INSTALLATION IS COMPLETE. 4. ALL VALVES SHALL BE TIED WITH 3/4" THREADED TIE RODS TO THE MAIN. MEGA LUGS MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF TIE RODS. 5. THE INITIAL & FINAL RAISING OF VALVE BOXES SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJECT. 6. BOXES SHALL BE WATEROUS SERIES 2500 OR APPROVED EQUAL. METAL SEATED GAVE VALVES ARE NOT N ALLOWED. O SCALE CITY OF Special Details VALVE BOX Date: 04 01-15 INSTALLATION H U-W-3 Revised: \ EST. 1906 03-12-20 / VALVE BOX NO SCALE ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-436-4030 PROJECT CATTLE HOUSE RESTAURANT & EVENT CENTER HUGO, MINNESOTA S H E E T I N D E X PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)l PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN REVIEW oz/v/zoZo ISSUE DATE AMENDED CITY APPLICATION 02/20/2020 CITY COMMENTS 03/02/2020 CITY COMMENTS 1 04/10/2020 D E S I G N Civil Engineering Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 www.elanlab.com f 612.260.7990 C E R T I FICAT10N I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professiop eer under the laws of the statey�l A. `OA` N �\3 co Stephen M. Johnston DATE REGISTRATION NO. 18914 01/17/2020 SHEET DETAILS C-504 SANITARY CLEANOUT NO SCALE INSIDE DROP SANITARY MANHOLE NO SCALE PROJECT NO, ARC19010 1899CGP APPROX. DRAIN AREA = 87.29 SO IN APPROX. WEIGHT WITH FRAME = 60.75 LBS 1.25 2.75 O O NYLO LAST O O 0 0 0 o D 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 00 0 0 �� o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DUCTI E IRO O O O O 018.64 0 22.13 DIMENSIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY ACTUAL DIMENSIONS MAY VARY DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES GRATE MEETS H-10 LOAD RATING THIS PRINT DISCLOSES SUBJECT MATTER INWHICH NYLOPLASTHAS DRAWN BY EBC MATERIAL 3130 VERONA AVE QUALITY: MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A536 GRADE 70-50-05 PROPRIETARY RIGHTS. THE RECEIPT OR POSSESSION OF THIS PRINT BUFORD, GA 30518 PAINT: CASTINGS ARE FURNISHED WITH A BLACK PAINT DOES NOT CONFER,TRANSFER, OR LICENSETHE USE OFTHE DESIGN DATE 3.7.06 DUCTILE IRON PHN(770)932.2443 FAX 770 932-2490 SIZE OF OPENING MEETS REQUIREMENTS OF AMERICAN DISABILITY THITRSPRINI OR AN INFORMATION ION CO HEREIN REPRODUCTION OF NY'O last I 1 ACT AS STATED IN FEDERAL REGISTER PART III, DEPARTMENT OF MANUFACTORANYINFORMATIONCONTAINEDHERHE DISEIN, ORCLOSURE REVISED BY EBC PROJECT NO.INAME www.nyloplas4us.com MANUFACTURE OF ANY ARTICLE HEREFROM, FOR THE DISCLOSURE TITLE JUSTICE, 28 CFR PART 36. TOOTHERS IS FORBIDDEN, EXCEPT BY SPECIFIC WRITTEN DATE 3.13.10 LOCKING DEVICE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST SEE DRAWING NO. PERMISSION FROM NYLOPLAST 18 IN PEDESTRIAN GRATE ASSEMBLY -TYPEC 7001-110-028 ©wia NYLOPLASTDWG SIZE A SCALE 1:10 SHEET 1 OF 1 DWG NO. 7001.110.212 REV C (1, 2) INTEGRATED DUCTILE IRON FRAME & GRATE TO MATCH BASIN O.D. (3) VARIABLE INVERT HEIGHTS AVAILABLE (ACCORDING TO PLANS/TAKE OFF) 1899CGC APPROX. WEIGHT WITH FRAME = 68.50 LBS 1 1.25 2.7� O O NYLO 1AST O O D 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 UCTI E IRO O O O O 018.64 022.13 DIMENSIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY THIS PRINT DISCLOSES SUBJECT MATTER IN WHICH NYLOPLAST HAS DRAWN BY EBC MATERIAL 3130 VERONA AVE ACTUAL DIMENSIONS MAY VARY PROPRIETARY RIGHTS. THE RECEIPT OR POSSESSION OF THIS PRINT BUFORD, GA 30518 DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES DOES NOT CONFER,TRANSFER, OR LICENSE THE USE OF THE DESIGN DATE 3.8.06 DUCTILE IRON PHN(770)932.2443 GRATE MEETS H-20 LOAD RATING OR TECHNICAL INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN REPRODUCTIONOF Nylo laSt' FAX (770)932.2490 QUALITY: MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A536 GRADE 70-50-05 THIS PRINT ORANY INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN, OR REVISED BY EBC PROJECT NO.INAME www.nyloplast-us.com MANUFACTURE OF ANY ARTICLE HEREFROM, FOR THE DISCLOSURE TITLE PAINT: CASTINGS ARE FURNISHED WITH A BLACK PAINT TOOTHERS IS FORBIDDEN, EXCEPT BY SPECIFIC WRITTEN DATE 3.13.10 LOCKING DEVICE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST SEE DRAWING NO. PERMISSION FROM NYLOPLAST 18 IN SOLID COVERASSEMBLY- TYPE C 7001-110-027 Tema NYLOPLAST I DWG SIZE A I SCALE 1:10 SHEET 1OF1 1 DWG NO. 7001.110.214 REV C NYLOPLAST 18" DRAIN BASIN: 2818AG X MINIMUM PIPE BURIAL DEPTH PER PIPE MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATION (MIN. MANUFACTURING REQ. SAME AS MIN. SUMP) (4) VARIOUS TYPES OF INLET & OUTLET ADAPTERS AVAILABLE: 4" -18" FOR CORRUGATED HDPE (ADS N-12/HANCOR DUAL WALL, ADS/HANCOR SINGLE WALL), N-12 HP, PVC SEWER (EX: SDR 35), PVC DWV (EX: SCH 40), PVC C900/C905, CORRUGATED & RIBBED PVC WATERTIGHT JOINT (CORRUGATED HDPE SHOWN) 3 1 - GRATES/SOLID COVER SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PER ASTM A536 GRADE 70-50-05. 2 - FRAMES SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PER ASTM A536 GRADE 70-50-05. 3 - DRAIN BASIN TO BE CUSTOM MANUFACTURED ACCORDING TO PLAN DETAILS. RISERS ARE NEEDED FOR BASINS OVER 84" DUE TO SHIPPING RESTRICTIONS. SEE DRAWING NO.7001-110-065. 4 - DRAINAGE CONNECTION STUB JOINT TIGHTNESS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM D3212 FOR CORRUGATED HDPE (ADS N-12/HANCOR DUAL WALL), N-12 HP, & PVC SEWER. 5 - ADAPTERS CAN BE MOUNTED ON ANY ANGLE 0° TO 360°. TO DETERMINE MINIMUM ANGLE BETWEEN ADAPTERS SEE DRAWING NO.7001-110-012. (5) ADAPTER ANGLES VARIABLE 0° - 36( ACCORDING TO PLANS NYLOPLAST AREA DRAIN 18" MIN WIDTH GUIDELINE 8" MIN THICKNESS GUIDELINE TRAFFIC LOADS: CONCRETE SLAB DIMENSIONS ARE FOR GUIDELINE PURPOSES ONLY. ACTUAL CONCRETE SLAB MUST BE DESIGNED TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION LOCAL SOIL CONDITIONS, TRAFFIC LOADING, & OTHER APPLICABLE DESIGN FACTORS. SEE DRAWING NO.7001-110-111 FOR NON TRAFFIC INSTALLATION. (3) VARIABLE SUMP DEPTH ACCORDING TO PLANS (6" MIN. BASED ON MANUFACTURING REQ.) 4" MIN THE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED STONE OR OTHER GRANULAR MATERIAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CLASS I, CLASS II, OR CLASS III MATERIAL AS DEFINED IN ASTM D2321. BEDDING & BACKFILL FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BE PLACED & COMPACTED UNIFORMLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321. GRATE OPTIONS LOAD RATING i PART# DRAWING# PFCESTRI.AN MEETS H-10 1899CGP 7001-110-212 STANDARD MEETS hi-20 1899CGS 7001-110-213 SQi.ID COVER MEETS H-20 1899CGC 7071-110-214 DOME NIA 1899CGD 7001.110-215 DROP 1N GRATE: LIGHT DUTY I 18010I 7001110-074 NO SCALE J 1 �1i2„ 4H BEND -H t zo LO m -1 SIDE FRONT RODENT SHIELD OI DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE TO ALLOW FOR BEND AND A SNUG FIT IN SLOT IN HEADWALL. DISCHARGE DRAIN PIPE TWO NO. 4E VERTICAL BARS RODENT SHIELD Q1 Q I U O NO. 4E HORIZONTAL cm 1" t BAR (CENTERED) M PLAN 1-1/2" u/ OPTIONAL HANDLING HOLES :;:• =:v NO. 4E HORIZONTAL BAR SECTION NOTES: 7T 2'11"t WI LL NO. 4E HORIZONTAL BAR NO. 4E VERTICAL BAR (2 REQUIRED ) DIMENSIONS 4" DIA. PIPE 6" DIA. PIPE 8" DIA. PIPE A 6-1/2" 8-1/2" 10-1/2" B 11010 11211 11411 C 5" T" 9" D 1.0.. 1' 2" 1' 4" E 1 8-1/2" 10-1/2" 1' 0-1/2" F 9" 11" 1' 1" G 9-1/2" 11-1/2" VI-1/2" H 0 5" T" 9-1/2" I 11" 1' V. V 3;-'- 1 6" 8" 10" APPROX. WT. 210 LBS. 250 LBS. 300 LBS. 0 EXACT DIMENSION DEPENDENT ON COUPLING METHOD. T END VIEW H (DIAMETER OF HOLE FOR DRAIN PIPE) TWO NI 4E VERTICAL BARS 1/2" FILLET — 3/4"CHAMFER (TYPICAL) • NO. 4E HORIZONTAL BAR ALL CONCRETE MATERIALS SHALL BE MN/DOT MIX DESIGNATION 3W46 AND/OR OTHER MIX AS APPROVED BY THE STATE MATERIALS ENGINEER. HEADWALLS SHALL NOT BE SHIPPED UNTIL CONCRETE HAS REACHED A COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 5000 PSI. THE EPDXY BARS SHALL BE SECURELY RETAINED SO THEY ARE NOT DISPLACED DURING CONCRETE PLACEMENT. TIE WIRE SHALL BE EPDXY COATED. WELDING WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. THE FABRICATOR SHALL PROVIDE A QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM APPROVED BY THE MATERIALS ENGINEER. Q1 THE RODENT SHIELD SHALL BE FABRICATED FROM CARBON STEEL FLATTENED EXPANDED METAL, STYLE 1/21,NO. 4F. IT SHALL BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION. ACTUAL SCREEN DIMENSIONS SHALL BE SUCH AS WILL SNUGLY FIT THE PROVIDED SLOT (TAPERED IF NECESSARY ),WITH THE SCREEN LIP FITTING FLUSH WITH THE CASTING TOP AND THE BOTTOM FITTING TIGHT TO THE FLOW LINE. 20 THE MANUFACTURER'S NAME AND DATE OF PRODUCTION (MONTH AND YEAR )SHALL BE CLEARLY CAST NOT INK STAMPED )INTO EITHER THE BOTTOM OF EACH HEADWALL OR NEAR THE BOTTOM OF THE LARGE END IF A MANUFACTURER HAS MORE THAN ONE PLANT, THEY SHALL BE APPROPRIATELY CODED. APPROVED AUGUST 20,2001 — — — — — — l STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PRECAST CONCRETE HEADWALL FOR SUBSURFACE DRAINS SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2502 STANDARD PLATE NO. 3131C REVISED STATE DESIGN ENGINEER 3-22-2013 M.J.E. PRECAST CONCRET HEADWALL � NO SCALE ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-436-4030 PROJECT CATTLE HOUSE RESTAURANT & EVENT CENTER HUGO, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN REVIEW oz/1�/2020 ISSUE DATE AMENDED CITY APPLICATION 02/20/2020 CITY COMMENTS 03/02/2020 CITY COMMENTS 1 04/10/2020 D E S I G N Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 www.eIanIab.com f 612.260.7990 C E R T I FICAT10N I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professio eer under the laws of the statey,QiHpll A. `OA` N �v�, ONS� G Stephen M. Johnston DATE REGISTRATION NO. 18914 01/17/2020 SHEET DETAILS C-505 PROJECT NO. ARC19010 LEGEND SOD //// SEEDING SEE SHEET C-204 FOR SEEDING NOTES ROCK MULCH OVER FILTER FABRIC RIP RAP OVER FILTER FABRIC PLAY SURFACE EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN LANDSCAPE SUMMARY W �w MR1 m � I'q VD° z QED �L �iVcTO� WA SH/Nc; �Th,�Riv pN Cp R��� UNTY R �o,4D) EC/O US NAB RAIL LR ROAD . 1 A UTH p RrTY MAC „r MW dot.. ftfM RETAIL OUTDOOR SEATI AREA 'BENCH 1r ►'tt�.f►�� / ° DRAINAGE &UTILITY °'1 EASEMENT c LIGHTING (TYP) TRASH ENCLOSURE ° . ° BIKE RACKS L� — — — / DRAINAGE & U ILITY , / �° EASEMENT '/ ° ' J' BIKE RACKSo\Sy RETAIL ° / / oSFr ---y 0 o°. DRAINAGE & UTILITY ' EASEMENT ° BENCH (TYP) DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT / DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT — WL — — — WL W / \ 1? \ 6z WOOD BOARD), / ABOVEF HWL 928.5 EDGE OF DELINEATED WETLAND EDGE OF ICE MEASURED ON 12-05-19 ICE ELEVATION = ASSUMED OHWL REQUIRED OVERALL PROPOSED PHASE 1 PHASE II VALUE MIN. 1 % COST OF IMPROVEMENTS OVERALL IMPROVEMENTS ABOVE 1 % COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPE 1 DECIDUOUS TREE / 2,000 SF GROSS BLDG = 18,970/ 2,000 = 9 23 DECIDUOUS TREES 10 DECIDUOUS TREES 13 DECIDUOUS TREES OR 1 DECIDUOUS TREE / 100 LF SITE PERIMETER = 2,250/ 100 = 23 1 CONIFEROUS TREE / 2,000 SF GROSS BLDG = 18,970/ 2,000 = 9 11 CONIFEROUS TREES 6 CONIFEROUS TREES 5 CONIFEROUS TREES OR 1 CONIFEROUS TREE / 100 LF SITE PERIMETER = 2,250/ 200 = 11 1 ORNAMENTAL TREE / 2,000 SF GROSS BLDG = 18,970/ 2,000 = 9 11 ORNAMENTAL TREES 5 ORNAMENTAL TREES 6 ORNAMENTAL TREES OR 1 ORNAMENTAL TREE / 100 LF SITE PERIMETER = 2,250/ 200 = 11 1 SHRUB / 2,000 SF GROSS BLDG = 18,970/ 300 = 63 446 SHRUBS 172 SHRUBS 298 SHRUBS OR 1 SHRUB / 100 LF SITE PERIMETER = 2,250/ 30 = 76 PARKING LOT PERIMETER AREA 10' TO RIGHT-OF-WAY & RESIDENTIAL 10' TO RIGHT-OF-WAY 8' TO NORTH PROPERTY 7.4' TO SOUTH PROPERTY 2 DECIDUOUS TREES 1 TREE / 30 LF PERIMETER FRONTAGE 337 LF/ 30 = 11 TREES 11 TREES 5 DECIDUOUS TREES 4 CONIFEROUS TREES INTERIOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING 5% MIN. INTERIOR ISLAND (100 SF. MIN SIZE) 3,508 SF 4.9% 1 TREE / 100 SF. 3,588/ 100 = 36 TREES 36 TREES 1 DECIDUOUS TREES 4 DECIDUOUS TREES (INSTALLED WITHIN PARKING LOT AND 20 CONIFEROUS TREES 11 CONIFEROUS TREES OUTSIDE PARKING PERIMETER) I AKIM01-Aoc: of Ani ,1 1 L% %I Y V V V/—%1 L 1 L/—A1 Y 1"=30' , 1 BENCH a — _ (TYP) w< \ wL 1 EGG LAKE OH W=926.62(NAVD88) SEASONAL BOARDWALK & DOCK BIKE RACKS RESTAURANT \\ 121 1 MONUMENT SIGN k GgRp"N ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-436-4030 PROJECT CATTLE HOUSE RESTAURANT & EVENT CENTER HUGO, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN REVIEW 02/17/2020 ISSUE DATE AMENDED CITY APPLICATION 02/20/2020 CITY COMMENTS 03/02/2020 CITY COMMENTS 1 04/10/2020 — DECK V-' FUTURE EVENT / CENTER FUTURE \ / WL WOOD BOARDWALK ` + \\ / > / DRAINAGE & UTILITY c00 x N FIRE PIT ;' ++++/ + + / / r / / / II EASEMENT r Z Z LAWN GAME AREA �\ +++�+ +++ INFILTRATION BASIN \ \\ ; ++++ — — — TRAIL EASEMENT / \ N.\ D E S I G N \\\ < \ \ \ DRAINAGE & UTILITY Civil Engineering g� g I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services \\ \\ \ \\ EASEMENT \ 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 \ \\ NORTH INFILTRATION BASIN \ M I N N E A P O L I S, MIN 5 5 4 0 1 \ \\\ BOCCE BALL COURTS p 612.260.7980 \\\\ \ \ f 612.260.7990 www.elanlab.com NOTE: 1. APPLICANT IS EXPLORING OPTIONS FOR USING WATER FROM EGG LAKE FOR IRRIGATION. 2. APPLICANT TO WORK WITH DNR TO OBTAIN PERMIT TO USE WATER FROM EGG LAKE FOR IRRIGATION. 3. ALL LANDSCAPED AND TURF AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED. 4. IRRIGATION PLAN TO BE SUBMITTED WITH BUILDING PERMIT. \\\ I IVVL JLV.J EDGE OF DELINEATED WETLAND EDGE OF ICE MEASURED ON 12-05-19 ICE ELEVATION = ASSUMED OHWL \ CERTIFICATION \ I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision and that I am a \ \ duly Licensed Landsca l ct under the laws / of the state of Iv]J,�WS pA\ N vG,\ �V CO / I Pilarsinee Saraithong 1 / REGISTRATION N0. 45059 / I I / / SHEET 30 90 Know what's below. CaII before you dig. SCALE IN FE T LANDSCAPE PLAN L-1 01 PROJECT NO. ARC19010 DATE 01 /17/2020 LANDSCAPE NOTES 7 WL \ - WL - WL ENLARGED LANDSCAPE PLAN ill =20' 3. AREA UNDER OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE SHRUB PLANTING (TYP) _ CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING (TYP) EXISTING TREE (TYP) + + + + +\ + + +/ + +\+ + + + + \+ 4/ / // /� �`� / �� + + J� o Ir/ EXISTING TREE \ (TYP) \ DRAINAGE & UTILITY \ EASEMENT LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINISHED GRADING AND POSITIVE SURFACE DRAINAGE IN ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT THE FINAL GRADES ARE MET AS SHOWN ON 8. EDGE ALL SHRUB BEDS WITH 3/16" X 4" MILL FINISHED ALUMINUM EDGING WITH STAKES. ALL EDGING TO BE GRADING PLAN. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR RESOLUTION. COMMERCIAL GRADE. ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO CONFORM WITH STATE & LOCAL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND THE CURRENT 9. APPLY THREE (3) INCH DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH IN ALL SHRUB AREAS AND APPLY TWO (2) INCH ADDITION OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS. ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO BE HEALTHY, DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH IN PERENNIAL AREAS. PRIOR TO MULCHING, APPLY PRE -EMERGENT HARDY STOCK, AND FREE FROM ANY DISEASES, DAMAGE, AND DISFIGURATION. HERBICIDE TO ALL PLANTING BEDS. QUANTITIES OF PLANTS LISTED ON THE PLAN ARE TO GOVERN ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITIES SHOWN 10. APPLY PRE -EMERGENT TO MULCH IN PLANTING AREAS TO PROHIBIT WEED GROWTH. APPLICATION RATE TO BE PER ON THE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN. PLACE PLANTS IN PROPER SPACING FOLLOWING LAYOUT FIGURES. MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. IF WEEDS APPEAR IN TREATED AREAS DURING THE FIRST YEAR, LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE ALL WEEDS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. TOPSOIL TO BE MNDOT 3877.2B LOAM TOPSOIL BORROW FOR LANDSCAPED AREAS AND PLANTING BEDS. PROVIDE ROOTING TOPSOIL BORROW MNDOT 3877.2E FOR PLANT RESTORATION, WATER QUALITY, AND FILTRATION PLANTING. 11. ALL TREES ADJACENT TO VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION SHALL HAVE LOWER BRANCH AT 6 FEET MINIMUM ABOVE PAVEMENT. SPREAD PLANTING SOIL AT MINIMUM EIGHTEEN (18) INCH DEEP IN ALL PLANTING BEDS PRIOR TO PLANTING. THOROUGHLY WATER TWICE TO FACILITATE CONSOLIDATION PRIOR TO PLANTING. DO NOT OVERLY COMPACT SOIL. 12. THE ENTIRE LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH AN UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM. NO WATER IS PLANTING SOIL TO HAVE A PH BETWEEN 6.5-7.5, BE FREE OF CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS, DEBRIS, LARGE ROCKS ALLOWED ON ANY PAVEMENT, PARKING, WALKWAY, AND BUILDING. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR IS TO DESIGN AND GREATER THAN 1/ 2" DIAMETER, AND FRAGMENTS OF WOOD. SUBSOIL SHALL BE SCARIFIED TO A DEPTH OF 4" BEFORE SUBMIT SHOP DRAWING OF IRRIGATION DESIGN AND CALCULATIONS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW 5 DAYS PLANTING SOIL IS SPREAD. PRIOR TO PURCHASING AND INSTALLATION. IRRIGATION DESIGN IS TO MEET ALL CITY AND STATE PLUMBING CODES AND REQUIREMENTS. MULCH TO BE SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH (MNDOT 3882 TYPE 6), CONSISTED OF RAW WOOD MATERIAL FROM TIMBER AND BE A PRODUCT OF A MECHANICAL CHIPPER, HAMMER MILL, OR TUB GRINDER. THE MATERIAL SHALL BE 13. ANY IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL REQUIRE REGISTRATION AS A PRIVATE UTILITY AND SUBSTANTIALLY FREE OF MOLD, DIRT, SAWDUST, AND FOREIGN MATERIAL AND SHALL NOT BE IN AN ADVANCED STATE ENROLLMENT IN THE GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL -SYSTEM, SO THAT ANY ONE DIGGING IN THIS AREA WILL BE MADE OF DECOMPOSITION. THE MATERIAL SHALL NOT CONTAIN CHIPPED UP MANUFACTURED BOARDS OR CHEMICALLY AWARE THE LINES IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. TREATED WOOD, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WATER BOARD, PARTICLE BOARD, AND CHROMATED COPPER ARSENATE (CCA) OR PENTA TREATED WOOD. THE MATERIAL SHALL BE TWICE -GROUND/ SHREDDED, SUCH THAT; NO 14. FOLLOW LANDSCAPE DETAILS FOR ALL INSTALLATION, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. INDIVIDUAL PIECE SHALL EXCEED 2 INCHES IN ANY DIMENSION. 15. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN PLANTS IN HEALTHY CONDITION THROUGHOUT WARRANTY PERIOD. THE APPLY FOUR (4) INCH DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH IN FOUR (4) FOOT DIAMETER RING AROUND ALL WARRANTY PERIOD IS TWO FULL YEARS FROM DATE OF PROVISIONAL ACCEPTANCE UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE. TREES. WARRANTY PERIOD FOR PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLED AFTER JUNE 1ST SHALL COMMENCE THE FOLLOWING YEAR. PHASE I PLANT SCHEDULE LEGEND 07-1 SOD MESRIE GENERAL SEEDING SEE ISHEET IC 204 FOR SEEDING NOTES STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST SEEDING SEE SHEET C-204 FOR SEEDING NOTES 6" TYPE 1 RIP RAP OVER GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SAND PLAY SURFACE EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN KEY I QUANT. I COMMON NAME I SCIENTIFIC NAME I SIZE I ROOT. I MATURSIZE E DECIDUOUS TREES 4 HACKBERRY CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS 2.5" CAL. B&B 50'H X 409N 2 STREET KEEPER GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS 2.5" CAL. B&B 40-H X 20'W HONEYLOCUST VAR INERMIS'DRAVEE' 4 SWAMP WHITE QUERCUS BICOLOR 2.5" CAL. B&B 50'H X 40'W OAK 5 TRIUMPH ELM ULMUS 2.5" CAL. B&B 50'H X 359N 'MORTON GLOSSY' EVERGREEN TREES 10 CUPRESSINA PICEA ABIES UHT. B&B 25'H X 6'W NORWAY SPRUCE 'CUPRESSIAN' yuw/,mac 7 COLUMNAR EASTERN PINUS STROBUS 6' HT. B&B 40'H X 159N WHITE PINE 'FASTIGAIATA' 4 SCOTCH PINE PINUS SYLVESTRIS 6' HT. B&B 60'H X 30'W 5 TECHNY ARBORVITAE THUJA OCCIDENTALIS UHT. B&B 15H X 6'W 'TECHNY' ORNAMENTALTREES D5 SPRING SNOW MALUS 1.5" CAL. B&B 20'H X 15'W FLOWERING CRAB 'SPRING SNOW' SHRUBS 0 17 MUSKINGGUM CORNUS RACEMOSA 24" HT. POT TH X 4'W DOGWOOD 'MUSZAM' ® 38 DWARF BUSH DIERVILLA 24" HT. POT 3'H X 4'W HONEYSUCKLE LONICERA 0 32 SEA GREEN JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS 36" HT. POT 4'H X 5'W JUNIPER 'SEA GREEN' 0 4 FIRST EDITIONS RHUS TYPHINA 36" HT. POT 6'H X 6'W TIGER EYES CUTLEAF 'BAILTIGER' STAGHOARN SUMAC 0 17 GRO-LOW RHUS AROMATICA 18" SP. POT 2'H X 4'W FRAGRANT SUMAC 'GRO-LOW' O 36 SEM ASH SORBARIA SORBIFOLIA 24" HT. POT 3'H X 3'W LEAF SPIREA 'SEM' 0 28 ANTHONY WATERER SPIRAEA X BUMALDA 24" HT. POT 3'H X 3'W SPIREA 'ANTHONY WATERER' PERENNIALS 0 363 KARL FOERSTER CALAMAGROSTIS ACUTIFLORA 1 GAL POT 3'H X 2'W FEATHER REED GRASS 'KARL FOERSTER' MAGUS ECHINACEA PURPUREA 1 GAL POT 2'H X15W CONEFLOWER 'MAGUS' RUBY STELLA HEMEROCALLIS 1 GAL POT 1.5'H X 1.5'W DAYLILY 'RUBY STELLA' DENIM'N LACE PEROVSKIA ATRIPLICIFOLIA 1 GAL POT 2.5'H X 3'W RUSSIAN SAGE 'DEMIN'N LACE' DEAMII BLACK EYED RUDBECKIA FULGIDA 1 GAL POT 2'H X 2'W SUSAN 'DEAMII' LYRICAL BLUES SALVIA NEMROSA 1 GAL POT 2'H X1.5'W SALVIA 'BALYRICLU' WILLIAMETTE HOPS HUMULUS LUPULUS 2 GAL POT 20'H 'WILLAMETTE' SUBSTITUTIONS: IF ANY SUBSTITUTIONS ARE REQUIRED, SUBMIT WRITTEN DOCUMENTS AND PROPOSED SUBSTITUTIONS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL 5 DAYS PRIOR TO PURCHASE AND/OR INSTALLATION. NO MORE THAN 1/3 OF PROPOSED TREES CAN BE THE SAME SPECIES. ,o 20 60 Know what's below. CaII before you dig. r SCALE IN FEET ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-436-4030 PROJECT CATTLE HOUSE RESTAURANT & EVENT CENTER HUGO, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN REVIEW oz/17/2020 ISSUE DATE AMENDED CITY APPLICATION 02/20/2020 CITY COMMENTS 03/02/2020 CITY COMMENTS 1 04/10/2020 D E S I G N Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 www.eIanIab.com f 612.260.7990 C E R T I FICAT10N I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landsca ikct under the laws of the state of Iv]J,��S G, \�V OAS CD Pilarsinee Saraithong DATE REGISTRATION NO. 45059 01/17/2020 SHEET PHASE LANDSCAPE PLAN L-1 02 PROJECT NO. ARC19010 ONE FLAG PER COMPACT PLANTING SCARIFY SIDES 01 PRIOR TO PLAN' ONE FLAG PER WIRE COMPACT PLANTING SOIL SCARIFY SIDES OF PIT PRIOR TO PLANTING DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE & 3 STEEL STAKES AT 120 DEGREE INTERVALS 8' STEEL STAKE INSTALL ON THE SIDE OF PREVAILING WIND 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL, 1-1/2" WIDE STRAP TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH ROOT FLARE AT FINISHED GRADE OR FIRST MAJOR BRANCHING ROOT AT 1 INCH BELOW SOIL LINE MULCH, EDGING, & DISH RING (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) CUT AND REMOVE TOP 1/3 BURLAP (MIN.), WIRE BASKET, AND ALL NYLON CORD PLANTING SOIL WATER & TAMP TO REMOVE AIR POCKETS NOTES MAINTAIN TREE IN PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD (SEE SPECIFICATIONS). TREE STAKING AND ITS METHOD ARE OPTIONAL TO CONTRACTORS. TWO ALTERNATIVES ARE SHOWN. NO SCALE DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE & 3 STEEL STAKES AT 120 DEGREE INTERVALS 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL, 1-1/2" WIDE STRAP 8' STEEL STAKE INSTALL ON THE SIDE OF PREVAILING WIND ROOT FLARE AT FINISHED GRADE OR FIRST MAJOR BRANCHING ROOT AT 1 INCH BELOW SOIL LINE MULCH, EDGING, & DISH RING (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) CUT AND REMOVE TOP 113 BURLAP (MIN.), WIRE BASKET, AND ALL NYLON CORD PLANTING SOIL WATER & TAMP TO REMOVE AIR POCKETS NOTES MAINTAIN TREE IN PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD (SEE SPECIFICATIONS). TREE STAKING AND ITS METHOD ARE OPTIONAL TO CONTRACTORS. TWO ALTERNATIVES ARE SHOWN. NO SCALE = I--7TT REMOVE ALL POT AND ALL PLASTIC - LOOSEN ROOTS PRIOR TO PLANTING I T- I L SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM PRIOR TO PLANTING SHRUB PLANTING SEE PLAN AN PLANT SCHEDULE F R SPACING 12" MIN../ MAKE SAUCER AROUND PLANTS PROVIDE PLANTING BED 12" MIN. AROUND PLANTS MULCH (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) EDGING (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) PLANTING SOIL (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) NO SCALE PROVIDE PLANTING BED 12" MIN. AROUND PLANTS SET TOP OF ROOT 1" ABOVE GRADE MAKE SAUCER AROUND PLANTS MULCH (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) EDGING (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) PLANTING SOIL (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) LOOSEN ROOTS I I I I t I PRIOR TO PLANTING III —III IIII I I I— z SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM PRIOR TO PLANTING co PERENNIAL PLANTING TOP OF MULCH 2" BELOW TOP OF PAVEMENT ,, 12" MIN. NO SCALE PROVIDE PLANTING BED 12" MIN. AROUND PLANTS MULCH (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) EDGING (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) 24" MIN. TO PAVEMENT TOP OF EDGING TO BE MAXIMUM 1/2" ABOVE SURFACE MATERIAL INSTALL STAKES PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION GUILDLINES _ PLANTING SOIL (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) WF11 II I II I II I II I II 1I— EDGING AT PLANTING BED SOD AT HARDSCAPE EDGE NO SCALE NO SCALE PROVIDE MULCH POCKET ALONG CURB TOP OF MULCH 2" BELOW TOP OF CURB 1 1 I I 1 I I_117--71 1 1 1_1 I I=1 I I_TTT__ SCARIFY BOTTOM PRIOR TO PLANTING (_,_V PLANTING AT PARKING ISLAND INSTALL PLANTS ACCORDING TO PLANTING DETAILS MOUND PLANTING AREA ABOVE CURB LEVEL MULCH (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) NO SCALE 3" MIN.- 8" DIAMETER 2-PLY CORRUGATED HDPE GUARDS z UV INHIBITOR -TREATED WHITE EXTERIOR z m WITH BLACK INNER SURFACE �U) M U- 0 H 0 SET BOTTOM FIRMLY IN SOIL —I I II I II I II I II I I I I II I II I II I II I II I II I I— 8 TREE GUARDS NO SCALE ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-436-4030 PROJECT CATTLE HOUSE RESTAURANT & EVENT CENTER HUGO, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN REVIEW oz/17/2020 ISSUE DATE AMENDED CITY APPLICATION 02/20/2020 CITY COMMENTS 03/02/2020 CITY COMMENTS 1 04/10/2020 D E S I G N Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 www.eIanIab.com f 612.260.7990 C E R T I F I C A T 1 0 N I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landsca l ct under the laws of the state of 1v]J,QNC-S OAS N vC, CD Nc, Pilarsinee Saraithong DATE REGISTRATION NO. 45059 01/17/2020 SHEET LANDSCAPE DETAILS C-501 PROJECT NO. ARC19010 r r-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------i I � I � I � r— --------------------------------- I I —�---� r L T 7 r -1 r -1 r -1 r - __________L==—ii___=u F------------- ---- —� L-1{ !I j-------------------==L------------ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - =___-------=___-------- - - - - - - - - ———————————————— — — — i r r— — r �r-- 11 I fl IS — Fl 161--- JL---'Ld1 Ir � II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II I I r � �--� I II I II III , III II II II II II II II I! II II II II II II II 'I !'� f I'I � I'f II 'I I rf � II II II I I II II II I I II II II I I II II II � 'I V I! II II Ll II II II Ll II II II IJ II II I' I Ire--� DEC LIGF 5I ICE ELEVATI oN PREI=IN. METAL CORNICE BACKLIT ILLUM. 5ION PANEL STONE BASE MONUMENT 51 C N ROORTOP EQUIP. PARAPET SGREENING FRONT ELEVAT I CN RESTAURANT =A.9Pkl1ni11nn G.InNi/' SLOPED MEMBRANE ROOF 1lall - 11-011 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 North Third street, suite 220 612-436-4030 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Fax 612-692-9960 Mark Revision/ Issue Dale CITY SUBMITTAL 02-07-20 GREEN SCREEN ROORTOP EQUIP. METAL PANEL OR r' WALL -HUNG TRELLIS PARAPET 5GREENIN6 --. TIMBER CLADDING CITY SUBMITTAL 02-13-20 PLAN REVISION 02-27-20 ELEVATION REV15ION 05-05-20 -- CITY 5UBMI7TAL 04-10-20 I18" = I'-O" LACE ELEVATIQN 511E ELEVA710N D= T U M./ Dail = 1 N-011 METAL -5ARNNOOP SIDING ---STONE BASE TRA5H ENCL05URE 11all = 11-011 CATTLE HOUSE RESTAURANT AND EVENT CENTER HUGOWN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PROJECT NUMBER: Ici-1052-01 ISSUED DATE: 01-17-20 DRAWN BY: BL CHECKED BY: KA A2 1/a" = I'-0" Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2020 r I I I I - I I I I - I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------� - ------------------------ I II Ir 7 II II LT - II II r -7 r -7 r -7 I ---- ----1 � ----------� ----------� ----------� L— --------- J---------------------cl-- —__��---i---------------------- - I I�----=I�----nl �____------� —IF-- n �_ __��1r-- 11 Ir n r__�Ir---- 1 n 1 11 �====1 n r____=lr n J IL I I--- T ---I I II III 'III II II II II I I II II I II II II I II II I II II II I II II II I II II III //III�� III 11 \v�l U II V' ==�ILJI-----J1---1L III II L JL----J1---1L U JL----J1---1L � JL----J1---- II ICl/' II JI 11.p==�Ir==q11 11 -- I --------------------------------------------------------------------- =_— ------- —_— ------- --- ----------------- /I II IIL_ II JII �III 1 I iIL JILT /—J1i it DEC LIOF CATTLE HOUSE G R I L L 10'-0" MONUMENT 5 1 ON 5I r;�E ELEVA710N PREFIN. METAL GORNIGE BACKLIT ILLUM. SIGN PANEL STONE BASE I/8" = 1'-0" FUTURE PHASE 2 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 North Third Street, Suite 220 612-436-4030 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Fax 612-692-9960 ROORTOP EQUIP. RESTAURANT PARAPET SCREEN I NO 51 GNAOE / BARNWOOD 51 D I NO SLOPED / / MEMBRANE ROOF ANGLED WALL L \- STONE BASE METAL CANOPY \ALUM. STOREFRONT --5TUG00 FRONT ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0" AWNING Mark Revision / Issue Date GITY SUBMITTAL 02-0-7-20 METAL PANEL OR GREEN 5GREEN ROORTOP EQUIP. TIMBER GLADDINO WALL -HUNG TRELLIS PARAPET SGREENINO GITY SUBMITTAL 02-15-20 PLAN REVISION 02-27-20 ELEVATION REVISION 05-05-20 GITY 5UBMITTAL 04-10-20 I/8" = I'-O" LAKE ELEVATION 51r;)E ELEVA710N 1/8" = 1'-0" PREFIN. METAL GOPINO BARNWOOD SIC CEDAR GATES STONE BASE I/8" = I'-0" CATTLE HOUSE RESTAURANT AND EVENT CENTER HUGO,MN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PROJECT NUMBER: 1a-1052-01 155UED DATE: 0I-I-7-20 DRAWN BY: BL GHEGKED BY: KA 7RA5H ENCLOSURE 1/8" = 1'-0" Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2020 FLOOR FLAN I/8" = I,-0" (ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 North Third Street, Suite 220 612-436-4030 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Fax 612-692-9960 Mark Revision / Issue Date GITY SUBMITTAL 02-0-7-20 GITY SUBMITTAL 02-I5-20 PLAN REVISION 02-27-20 ELEVATION REVISION 05-05-20 CITY SUBMITTAL 04-10-20 CATTLE HOUSE RESTAURANT AND EVENT CENTER HUGO,MN FLOOR PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: 1a-1052-01 155UED DATE: 0I-1-7-20 DRAWN BY: BL GHEGKED BY: KA Al Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2020 Example of other building elvations that could be in the PUD Not approved as part of these applications. 0 o 0 o Qom m W CANVAS AWNING STUCCO BARNWOOD SIDING � ILLUMINATED o0 U 17 CP 51 ONAOE J J N_ N_ O O X (6 � METAL CANOPY O V N ' W I— w ALUM. STOREFRONT �o � Z2 V za� M N �E5 0 CID 0 ZL LL --L Q U STONE BASE DECORATIVE L 1 OHTS LU ON7 L /ATTl0 D w RETAIL BUILDING I/8" 0_ Z O w00 J �LU Q LU U M � z 00 LU X w W J W Al Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2020