Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Rachel Juba <br />April 1, 2020 <br />Page 2 <br />Stormwater Management <br />6. The applicant is proposing to utilize pervious pavement and infiltration basins to conform with <br />stormwater management requirements. <br />7. Required freeboard from groundwater, 100-year high water levels, and emergency overflow <br />elevations with respect to the lowest floor elevation are met. <br />8. City staff is working with the applicant on maintenance agreement requirements for <br />stormwater features that will be their responsibility. Stormwater features will be required to <br />have drainage and utility easements. <br />9. A MNDOT drainage permit will be required to ensure that current drainage rates to MNDOT <br />right-of-way will not be increased. <br />Transportation/ROW/Easements/Agreements <br />10. The developer has identified a concept for the entire property, however they are proposing <br />only to build on the northerly portion of the site identified as phase 1. <br />11. Consistent with the Access Management Plan and Memorandum of Agreement, the applicant <br />is identifying an additional 8-feet of Right -of -Way along TH 61. <br />12. The plan proposes two access locations, one at the 146th Street (southerly access) and one <br />at the northern portion of the site for access to the proposed restaurant. The southern <br />access is already developed on Trunk Highway 61, while the northerly proposed entrance is <br />not currently set up for a southbound left turn lane or a north bound right turn lane. <br />13. MNDOT has provided a review letter dated February 26, 2020. Comments within this review <br />letter will need to be addressed. Most of these comments are routine in nature, however the <br />comments related to traffic safety will require additional study. Since the northern access will <br />require geometric changes to TH 61, it will need to be reviewed through the Level 2 Layout <br />review process. This process will identify if the northerly access can be constructed as <br />proposed and if it can remain as a full access once the southerly entrance is constructed. <br />14. Access permits for the north and south access locations will be required from MNDOT. <br />15. Existing easements on the property are proposed to be vacated and new easements for <br />existing sanitary sewer, proposed watermain, proposed trail, proposed stormwater <br />management features, and the additional 8-feet of ROW along TH 61 will be granted. <br />16. A cross parking agreement will be required to accommodate the proposed vision for the <br />entire site. <br />Wetland <br />17. The applicant is proposing a board walk within the wetland area as part of this project. <br />18. Wetland impacts are avoided with the proposed improvements. Under the Wetland <br />Conservation Act boardwalks can be constructed in wetlands and qualify for a no -loss since <br />the posts/pilings are not considered fill. The applicant will be required to apply for a "no -loss" <br />permit for documentation purposes. <br />19. The developer will need to apply for a permit from the DNR in MPARS for the portion of <br />dock/boardwalk located within the wetland below the ordinary high water (OHW) level of Egg <br />Lake. <br />Water Reuse Plan <br />20. Stormwater reuse is not proposed to be incorporated into this project. Stormwater <br />management features proposed can't support the demand. <br />