PC Packet 05.28.20 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Victor Place Page 5 Lighting The ordinance requires lighting to consist of cut-off fixtures and for light cast on adjacent property and roads not to exceed'/2 foot candle measured at the property line or 1-foot candle measured at the street's centerline. The plans comply with these standards. Signage Wall signage is shown in sign bands on the north and south elevations. No freestanding signage is shown. All signage must comply with the Victor Gardens PUD standards. The applicant must apply for a sign permit with details ensuring compliance with ordinance requirements. Parking The City Code requires one space for every 200 square feet. This site requires 70 parking stalls and 77 are provided. The site plan notes 78 stalls are provided and must be updated. The Land Use regulations discourage dead end drive aisles but the shape of this site with the building as proposed make it difficult to provide continuous circulation. The parking areas on the east and west sides of the building do not allow for vehicular circulation and consideration should be given to striping one of the northernmost stalls in both areas as "no parking" to allow for the ability to turn around without having to back out of these dead-end aisles should the parking lot be full. The previous approved required shared parking with a cross access and parking easement with the property owners to the east. The developer and adjacent landowner have asked that this condition be removed from the PUD standards. Access As noted, the original approvals required shared parking with the property to the east and limited access to that existing curb cut on the Paws Pet Hospital site and a second access to serve this site to be located across from the private drive that serves the townhomes to the south. The developer has asked that the PUD be amended to eliminate this condition. The plans show a new access approximately 60 feet west of the Paws access and a 211 access to this lot near the west property line. Staff supports the two accesses to the site. We worked closely with the development team to evaluate an access across from the private drive as planned or as far west as possible to eliminate conflicts with the driveways to the south. Unfortunately, with the current building plan, aligning the access with the private drive to the south would bring the access directly into the handicapped stalls and would result in less functional circulation in the site. The applicant has pushed the access a far west as possible based the unapproved wetland delineation. Staff supports the access locations; however, once the wetland delineation is approved it should reexamined to try to move the access further west to eliminate conflicts with the driveways on the south.