My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020.08.17 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2020 CC Packets
>
2020.08.17 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/15/2020 1:00:49 PM
Creation date
9/15/2020 12:57:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
8/17/2020
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Schuman Variance, 6930 170th Street North <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />4. ANALYSIS: <br /> <br />A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning <br /> <br />The properties to the north, west, and south are zoned FUS and are occupied by single family <br />homes. Horseshoe Lake is located to the east of the property. The surrounding properties are one <br />to 12 acres in size. The area is classified as Low Density Residential in the 2040 Land Use Plan. <br /> <br />B. Setback Requirement Variance <br /> <br />The Shoreland Overlay District requires a structure setback of 200 feet from the OHW mark of <br />Horseshoe Lake however, the Minnesota DNR requires a 150 feet setback. The deck is proposed <br />to be setback 90 feet from the OHW mark of Horseshoe Lake. <br /> <br />5. VARIANCE STANDARDS: <br /> <br />The Board must review the requested variances with the standards outlined in Section 90-38 of <br />the land use regulations. Staff used these standards to review the variance request and finds the <br />following: <br /> <br />(1) Law. The variance as requested is permissible by law. <br /> <br />The proposed variance is permissible by law. <br /> <br />(2) Practical Difficulties. The applicant for a variance shall establish that there are practical <br />difficulties in complying with the provisions of the zoning regulations. The term “Practical <br />Difficulties” as used in the granting of a variance means: <br /> <br />a. Reasonable Use. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable <br />manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance and; <br /> <br />By constructing a deck on the property, the applicant is proposing to use the property in a <br />reasonable manner. No part of the property meets the shoreland setback requirements, <br />therefore making a variance request necessary for any construction on the property. It is <br />in staff’s opinion that it is reasonable to request a deck to be built on the property. <br /> <br />b. Unique Circumstances. The plight of property owner is due to circumstances unique <br />to the property not created by the landowner and; <br /> <br />The property is unique in that the existing home on site is legal nonconforming to the <br />shoreland setback requirements. The proposed detached deck is positioned to meet <br />setback requirements from the existing well. Additionally, the surrounding properties also <br />have buildings and accessory structures within similar distances to the OHW mark. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.