My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020.08.17 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2020 CC Packets
>
2020.08.17 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/15/2020 1:00:49 PM
Creation date
9/15/2020 12:57:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
8/17/2020
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Schuman Variance, 6930 170th Street North <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />c. Character of Neighborhood. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential <br />character of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Accessory structures are common within this area and are allowed in the FUS zoning <br />district. Many of the homes around Horseshoe Lake are legal nonconforming and do not <br />meet shoreland requirements. According to the DNR regulations, water oriented <br />accessory structures are permitted within the shoreland district and are allowed to be as <br />close as 10 feet from the OHW mark. Decks are considered a water oriented structure if <br />they are 250 square feet or smaller. Because the proposed deck is greater than 250 square <br />feet, a variance is required. <br /> <br />It is in staff’s opinion that there are practical difficulties in meeting the shoreland setback <br />requirements. The property owner is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner by <br />constructing an accessory structure. The parcel’s proximity to Horseshoe Lake, as well as the <br />existing home and well locations, limit the buildable area of a deck. Several homes and <br />accessory structures on Horseshoe Lake do not meet the shoreland setback requirements and the <br />proposed deck would not alter the character of the area. <br /> <br />(3) Spirit and Intent. The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of this chapter and with the policies of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to allow water oriented accessory structures on lakeshore <br />properties as well as to allow decks of the proposed size. The proposed deck is a reasonable <br />request and would be keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br />(4) Prohibited Use. The variance, if granted, shall not have the effect of allowing any use <br />prohibited in the district. <br />Accessory buildings are allowed in the FUS zoning district. <br />(5) Hazard Consideration. The variance, if granted, shall not permit a lower degree of flood <br />protection than required by this chapter. The variance shall be determined the minimum <br />necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief, and the variance shall not be issued <br />within any designated regulatory floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood <br />discharge would result. <br />The property is not located within a FEMA designated floodplain. However, the deck will be <br />required to meet building code regulations. <br />(6) Septic and Well Compliance. The sewage treatment system and water system of the subject <br />property is in compliance with city and state codes. <br /> <br />The property is served by well and septic systems. The applicant is required to meet setback <br />requirements in relation to the well and septic system. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.