My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020.09.15 CC Minutes - Midyear Budget Review
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020 CC Minutes
>
2020.09.15 CC Minutes - Midyear Budget Review
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2020 1:53:40 PM
Creation date
9/22/2020 1:52:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
9/15/2020
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for 15, 2020, Midyear Budget Review <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />The total general fund budget was up $340,000. Otkin explained that in addition to wage and <br />insurance costs, the remaining increase was attributed to higher law enforcement and street <br />department materials. The General Fund Budget also contains $200,000, for the third consecutive <br />year, to be set aside for maintaining the new tax rate that was set last year. <br /> <br />Otkin said he conservatively estimated non-property tax revenues, explaining that investment <br />earnings were zero because interest rates are near zero, and room rentals will be non-existent until <br />COVID runs its course. After subtracting those non-tax revenues, the General Fund Tax Levy <br />requirement was $6,075,000. <br /> <br />He recapped by saying staff was proposing an 8.9 million tax levy, which would not increase the <br />urban tax rate. He talked about how fiscal disparities increased 11 percent to $852,000. Almost <br />10 percent of the City’s tax levy is paid for through this program. The median value home <br />increased by 4.13 percent, and by keeping the tax rate the same, the tax would increase by $49.14 <br />on a median valued home. Otkin asked for the Council to come to a consensus on the levied tax <br />amount for approval on the September 21, 2020, Council meeting, which can be decreased <br />following the Truth in Taxation hearing in December, but cannot be increased. <br /> <br />Weidt talked about the surplus and having a lot of moving pieces with COVID, the economy, and <br />election, and he wanted to continue on the path Otkin had proposed. <br /> <br />Miron agreed and asked if the City will have an opportunity to adjust the CARES budget in the <br />event the federal government demands the money be returned. Otkin explained that staff will <br />need to document how our expenditures are COVID related and if we need to return the money <br />we will have already set aside the funds. Miron agreed with Weidt that there were a lot of <br />moving parts and having a cushion was a good thing. <br /> <br />Weidt asked about the City Planner position and if there was an intention to fill the position as <br />soon as possible. Community Development Director Rachel Juba explained it has been left as a <br />placeholder. The Building and Planning Departments continued to stay busy and they did use <br />Landform a few times to get through some of the planning projects this year. Staff will be <br />looking at the work load at the end of the year. Staff has hired interns in the past to reduce <br />workloads. Bear added that the Planning staff was as busy as can be, and it was not a very <br />sustainable pace, but he did not want to fill the position now and have economic conditions turn <br />downward. It was Weidt’s opinion that the City should not be too conservative about getting help <br />if needed. <br /> <br />Petryk asked about elections and increased election costs. City Clerk Michele Lindau replied that <br />the state was providing masks and hand sanitizers, and the other large expense was shields, which <br />would be funded through the CARES budget. <br /> <br />Weidt asked about the business grant program and how it worked if they also applied for grants <br />through the County. Juba provided information on the Washington County grant program saying <br />15 Hugo businesses had applied. There were over 300 applications that would total $5 million <br />dollars. The deadline for the second round of applications was September24, 2020. She stated she <br />would reach out to the County, but it was her thought that the City’s qualifications were close to
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.