My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021.02.01 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2021 CC Packets
>
2021.02.01 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2021 10:43:03 AM
Creation date
2/1/2021 10:40:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
2/1/2021
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />Geotechnical Report <br />2021 Street Improvements <br />Hugo, Minnesota <br />WSB Project No. 015887-000 Page 2 <br />2. PROCEDURES <br /> <br />2.1 Boring Layout and Soil Sampling Procedures <br />WSB completed 9 standard penetration soil borings along the proposed roadway reconstruction area. <br />The borings were staked by a handheld GPS device for horizontal locations. The approximate boring <br />locations are shown on the Soil Boring Exhibit in Appendix A which is an aerial photo. The ground <br />surface elevations at the borings were estimated by using LIDAR data with 2-foot contours. These maps <br />should be accurate to within +/- one foot (1’) provided ground surface modifications at this site have not <br />been completed since LIDAR data was obtained. <br /> <br />We completed the borings on July 29 and August 21, 2020 with a truck-mounted CME-55 drill rig <br />operated by a two-person crew. The drill crew advanced the borings using continuous hollow stem <br />augers. The drilling information is provided on the boring logs. <br /> <br />Generally, the drill crew sampled the soil in advance of the aug er tip at two and one-half (2 ½) foot <br />intervals to the termination depth of the boring. The soil samples were obtained using a split -barrel <br />sampler which was driven into the ground during standard penetration tests in accordance with ASTM D <br />1586, Standard Method of Penetration Test and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils. The materials <br />encountered were described on field logs and representative samples were containerized and transported <br />to our laboratory for further observation and testing. <br /> <br />The samples were visually observed to estimate the distribution of grain sizes, plasticity, consistency, <br />moisture condition, color, presence of lenses and seams, and apparent geologic origin. We classified the <br />soils according to type using the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). A chart describing the USCS <br />is included in Appendix A. <br /> <br />2.2 Groundwater Measurements and Borehole Abandonment <br />The drill crew observed the borings for free groundwater while drilling and after completion of the borings. <br />These observations and measurements are noted on the boring logs. The crew then backfilled the <br />borings to comply with Minnesota Department of Health regulations. <br /> <br />2.3 Boring Log Procedures and Qualifications <br />The subsurface conditions encountered by the borings are illustrated on the Logs of Test Borings in <br />Appendix A. Similar soils were grouped into the strata shown on the boring logs, and the appropriate <br />estimated USCS classification symbols were also added. The depths and thickness of the subsurface <br />strata indicated on the boring logs were estimated from the drill ing results. <br /> <br />The transition between materials (horizontal and vertical) is approximate and is usually far more gradual <br />than shown. Information on actual subsurface conditions exists only at the specific locations indicated <br />and is relevant only to the time exploration was performed. Subsurface conditions and groundwater <br />levels at other locations may differ from conditions found at the in dicated locations. The nature and <br />extent of these conditions would not become evident until exposed by construction excavation. These <br />stratification lines were used for our analytical purposes and, due to the aforementioned limitations, <br />should not be used as a basis of design or construction cost estimates.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.