My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PC PACKET 021121
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2021 PC Packets
>
PC PACKET 021121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 3:45:08 PM
Creation date
3/11/2021 3:29:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
2/11/2021
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY of HUGO COMMUNITY 12-18 -2020 <br />DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT <br />TO: Hugo Board of Zoning and Planning Commission Members. <br />FROM: Resident, Richard Degnan, 12160 Falcon Ave. N. <br />SUBJECT: Proposed Development, 4990 121 ' St. N. and 12165 Everton Ave. N. <br />Sketch Plan submitted by Laura and Jared Drengson, dated: 12-02-2020 <br />Dear members, <br />My name is Rich Degnan. My family and I have been residents of the city for <br />thirty-seven years. My wife, Cindy and I reside at 12160 Falcon Ave. N. located in the <br />Southwest section of the city. Our three grown children along with seven grandchildren <br />also remain in their hometown of Hugo. When we built our home we were looking for <br />space away from the populated area of White Bear Lake. Back then, Falcon Ave. N. was <br />a dead end gravel road that paralleled Hwy. 61 and the rail line next to it. The long trains <br />would rumble North at a pretty good clip rattling the pictures on our walls. We would <br />walk the open fields to the north with very few houses in site. Good country living, but <br />close to town. It did not last for long as others followed and a housing development was <br />established on the old Gallivan farmland. And the boom was on. We've seen many <br />changes to the area most noticeably the substantial increase in traffic and the home <br />density within the area. We were fortunate enough to secure a one acre parcel of land <br />surrounded by neighboring properties with the same. As you may or may not know this <br />area of the city is zoned R-1.One acre minimum lot size per unit. I am writing you today <br />in an effort to ensure it remains R-1 without exception. <br />A recent sale of a ten acre parcel directly abutting our property to the west has <br />prompted an interest to develop this parcel into a housing project. The proposed sketch <br />plan by the developer in my opinion does not meet the criteria required to proceed <br />without substantial changes to the submitted sketch. Aside from the destruction of <br />century old oak trees and towering pines on the property, the location of a retention pond <br />on the property is an issue. <br />It appears the developer has neglected to adhere to the R-1 zoning in this area. My <br />understanding is the developer is in negotiation to purchase an additional four to five <br />acres to justify the lot sizes indicated on the plan by calculating the GROSS acreage <br />owned to satisfy the required one acre per unit for R-1 zoning. <br />The City of Hugo's 2030 LAND USE PLAN, Chapter 4, (VLDR) Very Low Density <br />Residential section specifically states: Maximum Density ONE unit per NET acres. <br />NOT GROSS acres, NET acres. Gross acres are generally defined as the entire <br />parcel. While NET acres tend to be calculated based on usable land area plus the streets. <br />That being said, in the definition any portion of the property restricted from use as in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.