My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021.04.05 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2021 CC Packets
>
2021.04.05 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2021 11:06:31 AM
Creation date
4/16/2021 10:58:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
4/5/2021
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Xcel Energy – Variance and CUP Amendment <br />The comprehensive plan identifies this property as Business Park (BP). There are residential <br />properties to the north and south of the building. The character of the area is for the most part <br />industrial. There are buffers of woodland and landscaping between the site and the residential <br />uses. There are business park uses to the north of the property. It’s in staff’s opinion that the <br />proposed use is compatible with the character of the area. <br />C. Variance <br /> <br />The applicant is proposing to construct the outdoor training transmission poles at varying <br />heights, with a maximum of 72 feet, where 50 feet is required by ordinance. <br /> <br />Staff used the standards outlined in Section 90-38 of the City Code and found the following: <br /> <br />(1) Law. The variance as requested is permissible by law. <br /> <br />The proposed variance is permissible by law. <br /> <br />(2) Practical Difficulties. The applicant for a variance shall establish that there are practical <br />difficulties in complying with the provisions of the zoning regulations. The term “Practical <br />Difficulties” as used in the granting of a variance means: <br /> <br />a. Reasonable Use. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable <br />manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance and; <br /> <br />By adding to the existing training facilities, the applicant is proposing to use the property <br />in a reasonable manner. The additional facilities will not drastically alter the use or <br />intensity of the site and the site will remain a utility training facility. Additionally, the <br />proposed transmission lines are not unlike existing, operable utility poles located <br />throughout the City. It is in staff’s opinion that it is reasonable to request that the training <br />transmission line be of similar height to existing live operational utility poles in order to <br />ensure adequate training practices. <br /> <br />b. Unique Circumstances. The plight of property owner is due to circumstances unique <br />to the property not created by the landowner and; <br /> <br />The property is uniquely shaped and is surrounded by mature wooded areas to the west <br />and south, effectively screening the existing training facilities from adjacent land uses, <br />specifically the residential uses to the south. Additionally, the proposed transmission line <br />consists of utility poles that are similar to existing live operational utility poles that are of <br />similar heights. <br /> <br />c. Character of Neighborhood. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential <br />character of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />The property is zoned Business Park and is surrounded by other, existing business park <br />uses. Additionally, the property is buffered and screened from adjacent residential <br />developments by existing wooded areas and wetlands and will not alter the character of
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.