My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021.05.03 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2021 CC Packets
>
2021.05.03 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2021 4:18:38 PM
Creation date
4/29/2021 4:11:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
5/3/2021
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
190
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Rachel Juba <br />April 29, 2021 <br />Page 2 <br />S:\Users\R_Juba\DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS\The Meadows at Hugo\Final Plat\LTR-r juba- <br />Meadows at Hugo Pre Plat-PUD - 20210429.docx <br /> <br />Utility Plan <br /> <br />5. As identified in the City’s Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution Plan, a 24” trunk <br />watermain is proposed to be extended north from the water tower location. The construction <br />plans identify this 24” trunk watermain being extended through the development to the <br />northern property line, with the City of Hugo paying for oversizing costs. This 24” trunk water <br />main will need to extend through phase 1, to the north easterly portion of the site. <br />6. The City’s Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan identifies the way in which properties are to <br />be served by sanitary sewer. A sanitary sewer connection to the MCES Interceptor is <br />identified at 165th Street with a 36” trunk main, providing service to a large portion of land east <br />of TH 61. The proposed plan identifies a connection to the MCES Interceptor approximately <br />1320 feet south of 165th Street which will ultimately make the development of the area more <br />feasible considering the watermain is at the southwestern portion of the site and the <br />connection to the MCES interceptor per the comprehensive sanitary sewer plan is <br />approximately 1320 feet from the northern border of the development. All of the trunk <br />sanitary sewer within this development will be constructed with phase 1. <br />7. Due to the size of the and projected long-term flow anticipated in this sewer extension an <br />Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) would normally be required, however the City <br />had prepared an Alternative Urban Areawide Assessment (AUAR) for the Everton Area in <br />2001. This plan has been updated every 5 years and contains the necessary information to <br />fulfill the EAW requirements. <br />8. This trunk sanitary sewer is proposed to be constructed on the north property line of the <br />development. The applicant has provided signed drainage and utility easements for the <br />adjacent property to the north. The applicant will also be required to provide drainage and <br />utility easements to the allow the sanitary sewer to be extended to the northeast up to 165th <br />Street. Easements through parcel (PIN 0803121340002) will ensure the ability to extend the <br />sewer up to 165th Street should the need arise. The trunk sewer and watermain will need to <br />be constructed to the east property line as part of phase 1. <br />9. Metropolitan Council has reviewed the City of Hugo Sanitary Sewer Extension <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the change in the location of this trunk sanitary sewer <br />and have approved the amendment. <br />10. Detailed redline comments for street and utilities have been provided to the applicants <br />engineer. <br /> <br />Stormwater Management/Wetlands <br /> <br />11. Applicant is meeting rate control and water quality stormwater requirements through multiple <br />stormwater ponds adjacent to and hydraulically connected to the wetlands throughout the <br />property. <br />12. The City requested the development use water reuse to provide the required water quality <br />volume however the applicant has provided calculations and arguments which demonstrates <br />why this isn’t feasible due to site constraints. Due to the minimal grade change across the <br />site and the presence of wetlands throughout the site the stormwater ponds are hydraulically <br />connected with the wetlands which restricts the amount of water which can be drawn from a <br />stormwater pond for irrigation. For other developments that utilize a water reuse system, the <br />ponds can draw down 3-4 feet without any negative consequences, however due to the <br />hydraulic connection of the ponds and wetland, even drawing the pond down 6” has negative <br />impacts on the wetlands. The applicant provided calculations showing that if water reuse <br />were implemented, the wetlands would likely only receive water 1-2 times per year which <br />would cause a loss of the onsite wetlands and would not be permitted under WCA <br />regulations.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.