My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021.06.07 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2021 CC Packets
>
2021.06.07 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/9/2021 10:59:27 AM
Creation date
6/4/2021 2:55:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
6/7/2021
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Oneka Lake Reserve Pre Plat and PUD Page 5 <br /> <br /> <br />Setbacks <br /> <br />The applicant is requesting flexibility in setbacks for the development. The applicant is <br />proposing the following setbacks: <br /> <br /> R-4 <br />Zoning District <br /> <br />Proposed PUD <br />Minimum front setback from 150th Street 25 feet 25 feet <br />Minimum front yard setback from private <br />drive <br />N/A 15 feet <br />Minimum side yard setback 15 feet 15 feet <br />Minimum side yard setback between buildings 30 feet 20 feet <br />Minimum rear setback 25 Ft 25 feet <br />Minimum rear to side setback between <br />buildings <br />N/A 23 feet <br />* Requested PUD flexibility highlighted in grey <br /> <br />The development complies with the impervious surface requirements for building and surface <br />area coverage. <br /> <br />Development Phasing <br /> <br />The applicant is proposing to construct the development in two phases. The first phase is the <br />eastern portion of the development and the public park. The second phase is the west side of the <br />park. The site is proposed to be graded all at the same time. <br /> <br />Because storm sewer is required between buildings H and I in the first phase, staff suggests that <br />the applicant include building H in the first phase. <br /> <br />Landscaping/Signage <br /> <br />The applicant has provided a full landscape plan. The landscape plan exceed ordinance <br />standards. <br /> <br />Type of Planting Required Proposed <br />Overstory Deciduous Shade Tree 40 56 <br />Coniferous Tree 40 55 <br />Ornamental Tree 72 80 <br />Shrub 359 699 <br /> <br />In addition to exceeding the ordinance standard, the applicant is proposing to preserve some <br />stands of trees that are currently on the property. It’s in staff’s opinion that the applicant has done <br />a good job with the landscape plan, however the developer shall evaluate the grading on the <br />north end of the project to reduce any impacts to existing trees and staff recommends additional <br />trees on the north end of the property. Staff will continue to work with the applicant on the <br />landscape plan, for review and approval by staff.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.