Laserfiche WebLink
Dan May <br />Jared & Laura Drengson <br />1853 Birch Lake Ave <br />White Bear Lake, MN 55110 <br />Laura phone: 651-269-6285 <br />Email: ljmay14@msn.com <br /> <br />R-1 Minimum Lot-Width Variance <br /> <br />Chapter 90 Article IV Division 1. Sec. 90-96. – Large Lot Single-Family Residential District (R-1). <br /> <br />12165 Everton Ave. N. Hugo, MN <br />PID 31 -031-21-43-0001 <br /> <br />On behalf of Dan May and the Drengsons, we are asking for a variance from the minimum lot width <br />requirement as stated in the R-1 Large Lot Single-Family Residential code. The current resident owner of the <br />12165 Everton Ave 5.34 acre property has chosen to subdivide his property into two separate parcels, selling <br />4.18 acres and retaining his home on 1.16 acre. As the buyers, we are seeking to split the 4.18 acres into two 2+ <br />acre lots. However, due to the unique shape and position of the property, and the current owner’s desire to retain <br />his home on the acre which fronts Everton Ave, in purchasing the 4.18 acres, we are left with two access points. <br />One point of entry is on the northern boundary where the lot adjoins Everton Ave. with a frontage of 30ft. The <br />second is the southern point of entry where the lot adjoins 121st with a proposed frontage of 38ft. <br /> <br /> Requirement Requested Deviation <br />Minimum Lot Width at Front Setback Line 150ft Lot 9: 30ft <br />Lot 8: 38ft <br /> <br /> <br />We recognize the deviations from the standard are significant, however, considering the unique position and <br />accessibility, we have come to find this is the most logical and certainly the most nature-preserving method of <br />access to these lots. In being granted this variation, we aim to maintain the quiet nature of the area and placing <br />only two large parcels on the 4.18 acres. We have, thus far, found this to be agreeable to our adjoining <br />neighbors. <br /> <br />It should be noted that there are existing parcels which adjoin our project and do not meet the 150 foot lot width <br />requirement. As a result, we feel this request is not a large departure from what exists within the neighborhood <br />today. <br /> <br />Thank you all very much for your time and consideration of our project. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Dan May <br />Jared & Laura Drengson