2022.04.04 CC Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for March 21, 2022 Page 7 of 8 explained the properties being assessed were based on the frontage of any streets in the HOA. There would be additional assessments for the same group of properties when other roads were improved. He said he had worked closely with the City attorney to ensure the City was in compliance with State Statute 429. An appraiser had done a benefit appraisal, and the value increases far exceed what the assessed amounts would be. Erichson addressed the question on why the City did not budget for the entire project and the issue on the road deterioration. He said the City had never not assessed for improvements, and it was not uncommon to see a mill and overlay project done within a 15-20 year period. He acknowledged there were issues with the concrete curb and gutter, and that could have created some of the pavement issues, but it was hard to narrow down the deficiencies. Koenig asked why the single-family villas and patio homes were not being assessed. Erichson responded they would be assessed at the time those roadways were improved. Erichson addressed the question on detours saying they had not received authorization for plans and specifications. If the Council authorizes the project to move forward, a number of different options would be considered and shared in another neighborhood meeting. Erichson addressed the issue of improvements to private drives saying they were the HOA’s responsibility, and there would be no assessments. Bieniek further explained there were private roadways that abut some of those roads. Improvements to those roads would be paid for with collected dues. He also reiterated that those in the project area would be assessed twice, now and when Farnham was improved. He talked about the concerns neighbors had with MnDOT overseeing the project since the last project was failing. He questioned why the contractor or City was not being held responsible. Erichson responded that he had no knowledge as to what happened with that roadway project. The road was constructed by the developer and was not a City-led project. He said unfortunately there was a one-year warranty. MnDOT was not involved, and it was not a state aid route at that time. Weidt explained that streets are a part of an entire system used by the entire City, including construction traffic. The majority of the cost for improvements is paid by all residents and state money and grants. Ellen Johnson talked about the large construction vehicles she sees every day and how it was unfair they do not pay for the roads. There were no other comments, and Mayor Weidt closed the public hearing. Council talked about the deferral and when a resident could request that. Erichson responded it could be done at the assessment hearing that will be held the first meeting in October, 2022.