Laserfiche WebLink
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for November 21, 2022 <br />Page 6 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />assessment rates, but they won’t change for this project. He talked about why they are proposing <br />this project to be done now. The preliminary plat for the project to the south had been evaluated, <br />but staff had no idea when it would be moving forward. Erichson said there was a need to get <br />moving on this project before it got worse. The street would be designed to manage the increased <br />traffic, and staff will encourage the contractors to use other accesses. <br /> <br />Ann Guthrie, 5965 138th Street North, asked about trash and recycling haulers. She said there were <br />currently have five haulers in the neighborhood, and she asked if they would be assessed, or if only <br />a few haulers could be allowed in the neighborhood. Guthrie asked about the sewer replacement <br />and management improvements, asking if it included the culverts that drain into ditches. <br /> <br />Weidt commented that one way to have less haulers in a neighborhood would be to get all people <br />in the neighborhood to agree. <br /> <br />Erichson explained that the catch basins are block built and failing and will be replaced. Some <br />culverts will be removed and replaced as well. The Public Works Department was monitoring the <br />ditches, but it was not part of this project. There would be more discussion when that happens. <br /> <br />Bear added that if there were specific concerns about drainage in a neighborhood, staff would like <br />to hear about it. <br /> <br />Tim Walsh, 5920 138th Street North, asked about the assessment policy and corner lots. He also <br />suggested temporary speed bumps or striping in the summer. <br /> <br />Erichson answered that if both streets on a corner lot were reconstructed, they would receive half <br />an assessment on each street. He addressed speed bumps and striping saying it was not an industry <br />standard for safety purposes. Staff would look into options and have further discussions when <br />presenting plans and specifications on the project. <br /> <br />A resident at 13790 Foxhill Avenue North asked about the time limit to do projects. He said he <br />has lived there for ten years and had noticed no difference in the streets. He knew Public Works <br />had done some patching. He said technology will improve in the next ten years, so why not keep <br />patching. He also asked about putting in a three-way stop. <br /> <br />Erichson explained there was not a time limit, but this project had been on the Capital <br />Improvement Project list for five or six years. He said he relies heavily on Public Work staff to <br />recognize the time and effort they put into patching roadways. There had been a strong consensus <br />on the bad condition of the streets and requests for improvements at previous meetings. He said it <br />would cost more to do a full reconstruction later than to do a partial reconstruction now. Erichson <br />indicated staff could look into the three-way stops. <br /> <br />Dorann Lohrke, 14079 Fountain Avenue North, said she lives on a cul-de-sac that has 13 homes, <br />and she wondered how traffic would be directed. She said the haulers are hard on the streets, and <br />that is what is destroying them. She asked what percent the City was paying for the project, and <br />she added that she was glad it was being done. <br /> <br />Erichson replied that construction is always an inconvenience, and the City’s Senior Engineering