Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Rachel Juba <br /> May 4, 2022 <br /> Page 2 <br /> the proposed development reroute this drainage through their connection to the 10"trunk line <br /> and abandon the existing connection and pipe. <br /> 10. The applicant will need to provide an entrance and utility stubs extending south from Street <br /> AA/ 159t" Street for an access road on the west side of the development to serve several lots <br /> on the east side of Highway 61/Forest Boulevard in the future. <br /> 11. Applicant will need to coordinate with and get agreements for all encroachments and work <br /> within the large Xcel Energy easement through the site <br /> Stormwater Management/Wetlands <br /> 12. The site is proposing water quality requirements primarily through water reuse for onsite <br /> irrigation. The remaining water quality required will be provided by the stormwater ponds <br /> onsite. <br /> 13. The site is meeting rate control requirements through the stormwater ponds onsite. <br /> 14. Additional permitting with both RCWD and DNR Floodplain/FEMA will be required for the <br /> culvert crossing in the ditch. <br /> a. While it is not a public ditch, the private ditch is considered a Regional Conveyance <br /> System under RCWD's definitions and will requires a Rule G permit administered by <br /> RCW D. <br /> b. Proposed fill within the floodplain requires additional permitting with the DNR <br /> Floodplain/FEMA. <br /> 15. While the information previously reviewed confirms the viability of the stormwater reuse <br /> system, additional detail on the irrigation system is needed for review. Details on where the <br /> pump will be placed, where the intake pipe will be laid and at what elevation, in addition to the <br /> location of the main line for irrigation should all be provided as the project moves forward. <br /> 16. Additional detailed redline drainage comments have been provided to the applicant and will <br /> need to be addressed prior to the issuance of the stormwater permit. <br /> 17. The boundary for the wetland, that is part of Outlot E adjacent to lots 6 and 7, does not <br /> appear to be represented correctly based on the approved wetland boundary. <br /> 18. Applicant to clarify whether proposing a boardwalk to cross the wetland in outlot E in the <br /> northeast portion of the project area. <br /> 19. Applicant to clarify how is they are proposing to construct the north-south trail corridor <br /> 20. The applicant will need to address potential draining of wetland adjacent to the deep <br /> stormwater ponds. <br /> 21. The applicant will need to confirm that these wetlands are not US army corps jurisdictional. <br /> 22. Based on the proposed plans, the applicant will need to seek approval for sequencing, <br /> sequencing flexibility(if they can't meet sequencing), and wetland replacement. <br /> 23. Applicant will need to provide vehicle access routes to each outlot for future maintenance. <br /> Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this project. If you have any questions, <br /> please do not hesitate to contact me at 651-286-8463. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> WSB <br /> Nick Gui liams, PE <br /> Senior Project Manager <br /> cc: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director(email only) <br /> Liz Finnegan, Senior Engineering Technician (email only) <br /> S:\Users\R_Juba\DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS\The Shores of Oneka Lake\Engineers Memo <br /> Shores of Oneka Lake Pre Plat-PUD - 20220504.docx <br />