My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PC PACKET 052622
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2022 PC Packets
>
PC PACKET 052622
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2025 2:15:00 PM
Creation date
3/21/2024 10:15:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
5/26/2022
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 3 <br /> During the previous sketch plan review processes, the City discussed the importance of access to <br /> Highway 61 with the development and determining the proper intersection design. The City also <br /> encouraged the preservation of the natural resources, including a portion of the stand of trees on <br /> the southern area of the project. <br /> It is in staff s opinion that the applicant has done a good job addressing the comments and <br /> concerns from the proposed sketch plan of the City Council, Commissions, and residents. <br /> B. Environmental Assessment Worksheet(EAW) <br /> Due to the size of the project, the previous applicant was required to complete an Environmental <br /> Assessment Worksheet(EAW) for the proposed development on this site. The purpose of the <br /> EAW is to identify potential environmental impacts for a specific development and to determine <br /> whether or not a more extensive Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) is required. <br /> Environmental impacts include impacts to surface waters, natural areas, utilities, transportation <br /> systems, historic sites, noise impacts, etc. <br /> The EAW for the proposed development of this site was completed in February 2006 and <br /> distributed to various agencies for public comment. The City Council reviewed the EAW and the <br /> comments received at their May 1, 2006 meeting and determined that an EIS was not needed for <br /> the project. <br /> Since this plan is similar,but smaller, a new EAW will not be required. However, as this project <br /> progresses, staff will need to ensure that the assumptions of the EAW are still valid. <br /> 3. CONTEXT: <br /> A. Surrounding land Use and Zoning <br /> The properties to the north is zoned General Commercial (COM), Single Family Detached <br /> Residential (R-3), and Future Urban Service (FUS) and guided as Commercial (COM) and Low <br /> Density Residential (LD) in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The parcels are vacant. The property <br /> to the east is Oneka Lake. The properties to the south are zoned Single Family Detached <br /> Residential (R-3) and are guided Low Density Residential (LD) in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. <br /> The residential development to the south is the Oneka Ponds development. The properties to the <br /> west are zoned General Commercial (C-2) and are guided Commercial (COM). The uses to the <br /> west are mostly industrial type uses, with some commercial uses. <br /> B. Natural Characteristics of Site <br /> The properties are currently vacant and do contain some challenges regarding an existing <br /> wetlands, drainage ditch, floodplain, and high ground water. The properties are relatively flat <br /> with approximately 26 acres of wetlands. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.