MINUTES EDA 01.16.24 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

since the DNR’s main concern was proximity to the water, and that the phasing plan included evaluating parking needs with each building as it was constructed. Commissioner Puleo asked if the City can view the last project’s process as an outline for understanding what the DNR may approve for implementation flexibility. Juba said that the formal implementation flexibility process would still be necessary, and Bear said that what staff learned is that an ecological and scientific basis is not the DNR’s primary concern. Commissioner Arcand said that the implementation flexibility option lends to Trooien’s vision specifically. President Weidt said that the DNR has had a certain degree of involvement with each approved project, and that there hasn’t been a consistent understanding of what can happen on this property. Juba stated that the implementation flexibility should provide a better understand of development capabilities city-wide, especially related to required setbacks from ditches. Bear stated that the DNR’s decision relating to any given project is highly dependent on the individual area hydrologist at that time, and that having a permanent framework will provide a higher degree of certainty going forward. Staff recommended that the EDA review and discuss the options provided and provide direction to staff. Commissioner Klein asked if the City has received any recent, serious interest in developing this property. Juba said no, and that a change in the advertising approach could change that. President Weidt said that the situation of economic development in the area likely hasn’t changed since the 2017 ULI workshop, meaning that another ULI engagement wouldn’t likely provide new insight. Weidt said he felt a sense of urgency to show that the City is doing something with the property ahead of the upcoming 2024 election, such as the interim community event space option. Commissioner Puleo suggested engaging with the DNR to avoid future problems related to development along the lake, with an interim use and waiting to find a developer who can do something special being good options. Commissioner Puleo asked if staff can research how other communities have utilized space for community events. Commissioner Arcand asked what the City’s reservations could be about developing the property themselves. President Weidt responded that a lot of cities have seen negative consequences, and that developing property puts a lot of risk on taxpayer money. Bear stated that a problem faced by restauranteurs is securing financing beyond the planning stages, signaling that even with the land being essentially free they don’t have the capital to complete the project. Bear suggested that the EDA could consider alternative ownership options for the land, such as a lease agreement. No further discussion. The EDA recommended that staff begin the process of obtaining implementation flexibility with the DNR, and in the meantime do some soft marketing of the property and explore interim community uses.