My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
EDA Packet 09.20.22
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
EDA
>
EDA Agenda/Packets
>
2022 EDA Packets
>
EDA Packet 09.20.22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2024 2:11:06 PM
Creation date
3/26/2024 2:05:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
9/20/2022
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
EDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 5 <br /> <br /> <br /> 5 <br />back by Egg Lake. It also show a buildings pushed back towards Egg Lake and limited <br />commercial buildings along Highway 61. The plan shows the development that creates a “main <br />street” like a traditional downtown. The applicant has stated they would like to create a <br />destination retail and restaurant project where the uses support each other. To create the <br />traditional downtown feel, the some buildings get pushed towards Egg Lake. <br /> <br />Staff is comfortable with the location of the buildings being towards Egg Lake since downtown <br />design guidelines highly encourage the development of a traditional downtown. The proposed <br />restaurants then can take advantage of the views of the lake on the east side of the building that <br />includes most of the dining area and a deck. <br /> <br />The layout of the property is different than what is shown on the downtown plan. The downtown <br />plan is simply a guide to show how the area could be development and it is not a plan to dictate <br />the exact placement of buildings or parking lots. The area proposed to be developed shows a park <br />area. Several years ago the Parks Commission discussed this and stated that as long as there are <br />active areas along the lake a park is not needed. They stated that Lions Park serves this area and <br />would rather see a trail along the lake as shown the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Building Coverage and Lot Coverage <br /> <br />The ordinance limits lot area to be covered by a building to 60% and lot area to be covered by <br />impervious surface to 90%. The proposed site plan complies with the coverage requirements. <br /> <br />The applicant also meets the shoreland impervious surface requirements for the development. <br />The applicant is proposing the following: <br /> <br />Shoreland Required Proposed <br />Maximum Impervious 25% 46% <br /> <br />Density <br /> <br />The maximum development density for a PUD in the Central Business (C-1) zoning district is 60 <br />units per 1 acre. The applicant is not proposing any residential units at this time. <br /> <br />Development Phasing <br /> <br />The applicant is showing the development completed in 2 phases. However, with discussions <br />with the applicant, the phasing plan could change overtime due to market conditions. The <br />applicant is proposing the restaurant building on the Lot 1, Block 1 as the first phase/building of <br />the project. The applicant has stated that everything will be built as shown in the first phase <br />except the SW building. That area will be green space until the building is built. All of the 118 <br />parking spaces shall be completed. <br /> <br />The phasing plan does not indicate the amount of property that will be conveyed to the applicant <br />with the purchase agreement.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.