My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
EDA Packet 10.18.22
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
EDA
>
EDA Agenda/Packets
>
2022 EDA Packets
>
EDA Packet 10.18.22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2024 2:11:06 PM
Creation date
3/26/2024 2:08:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
10/18/2022
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
EDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br />Rosemary Place Sketch Plan <br /> <br />1. The establishment of PUD zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations, to create <br />or maintain a development pattern that complies with the City's comprehensive plan. <br />2. The mixing of land uses within a development when such mixing of land uses could not <br />otherwise be accomplished. <br />3. Variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in this chapter in order to <br />improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporating design elements <br />(e.g., construction materials, landscaping, lighting, open space, etc.) that exceed the City's <br />standards to offset the effect of any variations. <br />4. A more creative and efficient approach to land use within the city, while at the same time <br />protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and <br />general welfare of the City. <br />5. Preservation and enhancement of natural features and open spaces, including but not <br />limited to the width expansion of greenway corridors, conservation of wooded areas, <br />development of buffer areas, reduction of impervious surface, and utilization of joint <br />facilities and utilities. <br />6. Maintenance or improvement for the efficiency of public streets and utilities. <br />7. Establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. <br />It is unclear how the proposed plan would meet the PUD criteria, and the proposed plan would <br />likely change significantly with a PUD application. <br /> <br />The applicant has stated that previous attempts of commercial development on the property have <br />not been successful, and that the portion of more buildable property where the apartment is <br />proposed to be located, facing Rosemary Way, is more viable for residential development than <br />commercial. Neighboring properties to the south that are similarly zoned and guided for <br />commercial use are currently occupied by commercial uses, generally following the spirit and <br />intent of the land use designation to provide commercial uses along CSAH 8. If the proposed <br />residential building were constructed on the northerly edge of the property facing Rosemary <br />Way, the commercial uses along CSAH 8 would remain. <br /> <br />Staff recommends that the EDA discuss the potential for changing the zoning and land use <br />designation of the property to allow for high density residential use, and whether the applicant <br />should implement a PUD with commercial uses alongside the proposed residential use. <br /> <br />Architecture <br /> <br />The applicant has indicated that the design of the building would be similar to one of their <br />existing developments in Forest Lake. The exterior of the building is proposed to be a mixture of <br />brick and steel siding with earth tone colors. The individual apartments would feature decks and <br />window shutters. The building would need to meet the city’s Multifamily Design Guidelines. <br />The applicant has provided photos of their comparison property in Forest Lake for a visual <br />representation of the architecture of the building. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.