My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
EDA Packet 10.18.22
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
EDA
>
EDA Agenda/Packets
>
2022 EDA Packets
>
EDA Packet 10.18.22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2024 2:11:06 PM
Creation date
3/26/2024 2:08:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
10/18/2022
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
EDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br />Rosemary Place Sketch Plan <br /> <br />Parks/Trails <br /> <br />Park Dedication <br /> <br />The developer is required to dedicate land, pay a fee, or a combination of land and fee. At the <br />maximum allowed density of 10 units per acre, the developer is required to 17 percent of <br />buildable acreage. The park dedication fee is $3,400 per unit. The applicant has not made their <br />intentions for meeting park dedication requirements clear at this time. The sketch plan shows a <br />playground and courtyard attached to the building, but it is unclear whether these would be <br />public or used as private amenities for residents. The applicant is currently planning to <br />incorporate walking trails within the remainder of the property to the east of the utility easement. <br />If this area would be incorporated into the city park system, then 1.3 acres of buildable land <br />would need to be used in order to meet the required 17 percent of buildable acreage for park <br />dedication. However, the applicant’s narrative seems to suggest that the trail area would be kept <br />private as a resident amenity. <br /> <br />Changes in zoning and land use for this property would need to be evaluated by the Parks <br />Commission for an assessment of the park system in the area and recommendations for park <br />dedication for this property. <br /> <br />Streets and Access <br /> <br />The applicant’s sketch plan currently shows two access points onto the property on the northwest <br />and northeast corner of the parking lot onto Rosemary Way. A traffic engineer may need to <br />review the proposed access points to understand if Rosemary Way can handle the proposed <br />traffic. Rosemary Way is a collector road and presumably can handle the additional traffic, since <br />high traffic is anticipated for collector roads. If the applicant were to develop a PUD with <br />commercial uses in the remaining portion of the property, additional points of access will need to <br />be provided. <br /> <br />Stormwater Management <br /> <br />The applicant has not provided plans for stormwater management or water reuse. The applicant <br />will need to develop a stormwater management plan that meets drainage requirements. This will <br />impact the areas that can be used for buildings and development. <br /> <br />Utilities <br /> <br />The property is served by city sewer and water. The sewer and water system can handle the <br />proposed land use changes. <br /> <br />3. CONCLUSION/ RECOMMENDATIONS: <br /> <br />Due to constraints on the property such as existing wetlands that are proposed to be filled, it is <br />not certain what the total buildable area will be in the plan review process. It is unclear in the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.