Laserfiche WebLink
July 11, 2024 PC Minutes <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />Daniel Baack, 6662 Lacasse Dr in Lino Lakes, asked about state directives for providing renewable <br />energy, and stated that he wants the city to continue permitting solar farms as a way to generate <br />renewable energy and for farmers to be able to supplement their income. <br /> <br />Ben Krull, 15350 Everton Ave N, stated that he believes Hugo residents do not want solar farms and <br />that the only people proposing them are not Hugo residents. <br /> <br />Nathan Dull, Minnesota Land and Liberty Coalition, stated that he believes prohibiting solar farms is <br />too extreme, and mentioned uses that are more disruptive to neighbors than solar farms. <br /> <br />Chair Kleissler asked the Planning Commission and staff to address some public comments. <br />Commissioner Petty asked if the existing solar farm project on 165 th Street had screening <br />requirements, Juba said that they had a landscape plan that exceeded the screening requirements at <br />the time, and that the plan would meet the current ordinance standards with the 2023 revisions. <br /> <br />Commissioner Granger asked if there are any other cities in Minnesota that prohibit solar farms, Juba <br />says yes. <br /> <br />Daniel Baack returned to the podium and asked if the question could be brought to a referendum. Juba <br />said that the city only puts items that are required to be decided via referendum on the ballot, and that <br />ordinance discussions are not one of those topics. Baack stated that the sample size present at the <br />public hearing may not be entirely representative and asked if the Planning Commission would <br />consider wider reaching methods of soliciting community feedback, Chair Kleissler responded that the <br />public hearing process is intended to ser ve that purpose. <br /> <br />Chair Kleissler closed the Public Hearing at 8:03 PM. <br /> <br />Commissioner Petty commented that nobody can truly speak for all residents of Hugo, including the <br />Planning Commission, that there are much more disruptive uses with greater impacts t o neighbors <br />allowed on agricultural property, and that she would not mind living next to a solar farm. Petty stated <br />that there is room for a discussion for revising the ordinance to address concerns before prohibiting <br />solar farms. <br /> <br />Commissioner Andress stated that he has a problem with prohibiting solar farms when the city has <br />made efforts for natural resource conservation, and stated he has family members in situations where <br />the ability to construct a solar farm could be financially beneficial. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lessard said that the greater than 40-acre minimum lot size proposed during the public <br />hearing, with the 5-acre solar array placed in the middle, would be too large, stating that it could <br />prevent the property from being subdivided. Commissioner Granger said that the minimum lot size <br />doesn’t matter so much as how close the solar farm could potentially be located to adjacent property. <br />