My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PC PACKET 07.25.2024
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2024 PC Packets
>
PC PACKET 07.25.2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2025 1:58:26 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 11:40:11 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 11, 2024 PC Minutes <br /> Page 4 <br /> Commissioner Arcand said that the current ordinance and its revisions went through a long and <br /> intensive process and weren't rushed, and that he would prefer to live next to a solar farm compared <br /> to a more disruptive use. <br /> Commissioners Lessard, Petty, and Arcand all stated that they would prefer to revisit the ordinance <br /> before prohibiting solar farms. <br /> Commissioner Kelly stated that there could be places within the city that the community is more <br /> comfortable with solar farms. <br /> Commissioner Granger stated that the review process with the Everton Avenue solar farm proposal did <br /> its job since there were multiple bodies reviewing it, and the proposal was ultimately denied. <br /> Commissioner Derr stated that the last time the Planning Commission considered prohibiting a use was <br /> with short-term rentals, which was due to extensive community complaints without any feedback in <br /> the other direction. Derr stated that solar farms are much less disruptive than short-term rentals and <br /> other allowed agricultural uses. <br /> Chair Kleissler said that the Planning Commission was able to hear several different perspectives <br /> including some that they hadn't heard before. Kleissler stated that she personally would not want to <br /> live next to a solar farm, but recognizes that property owners don't own their view. <br /> Commissioner Granger stated that of the comments they've heard there has been a balance of those in <br /> favor of the prohibition and those against it, but points to the small sample compared to the <br /> community as a whole. Commissioner Petty stated that while the representative sample size is small, <br /> that the viewpoints expressed were different enough from each other that she felt the Planning <br /> Commission could make a sufficiently informed decision. <br /> Chair Kleissler asked about viewpoints from Xcel Energy or the city's planning consultants at Landform. <br /> Juba stated that Landform hasn't been involved with this discussion topic, but that Xcel's <br /> representative, Mike Wilhelmi, spoke at the 2023 workshop. Wilhelmi stated at the workshop that <br /> while they're required to accept solar energy systems to interconnect into their distribution system, <br /> that they prefer larger utility-scale systems over the small-scale systems that third-party developers <br /> propose. Commissioner Lessard asked if the smaller systems make a sizable difference for renewable <br /> energy generation, Juba said that Xcel Energy would be better suited to answer that question. <br /> Commissioner Derr stated that he thinks there's some room for more restrictions that could effectively <br /> address community concerns. <br /> No further discussion. <br /> Commissioner Petty made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Granger, to recommend denial of the <br /> text amendments as presented, and to recommend a joint workshop with the Planning Commission <br /> and City Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.