Laserfiche WebLink
Page 4 <br /> <br /> <br /> 4 <br />6. Technical Evaluation of Floodplain. <br /> <br />The use is not located within the floodplain. <br /> <br />7. The proposed use should not increase the potential for flood damage. <br /> <br />The use is existing and does not obstruct the floodplain or increase the potential for flooding. <br /> <br />8. The proposed use will not damage or reduce the benefits the public receives from public <br /> waters. <br /> <br />The use does not damage or reduce the benefits from any public waters. <br /> <br />9. The use of watercraft on public waters. <br /> <br />The use does not involve the use of watercraft. <br /> <br />10. All structures shall be screened from view of public waters. <br /> <br />The use is screened and is not visible from any public waters. <br /> <br />11. Wetland impacts. <br /> <br />The use does not impact any wetlands. <br /> <br />12. All state and local permits shall be acquired for the conditional use. <br /> <br /> The applicant will be responsible for obtaining all state and local permits. <br /> <br />13. Adequate screening and buffering from non-compatible uses and public rights-of-way. <br /> <br />There are some trees that act as a screening measure between the existing house and the road. <br />The house and proposed building addition are set back approximately 750 feet from the road, and <br />the proposed building addition will not dominate the appearance of the property from view of the <br />road. <br /> <br />Staff finds that the request meets all of the requirements necessary to approve a Conditional Use <br />Permit. <br /> <br />5. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: <br /> <br />Staff finds that the proposal meets all the requirements necessary for the City to approve a <br />conditional use permit. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the CUP subject <br />to the conditions in the CUP and the resolution. <br /> <br />