My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025.03.17 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2025 CC Packets
>
2025.03.17 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 1:13:46 PM
Creation date
3/18/2025 1:09:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
3/17/2025
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Capstone Homes (Munger Property) – Sketch Plan <br />flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly <br />higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the use of other, <br />more standard zoning districts. There are also expectations that the development will have higher <br />standards on zoning code requirements in exchange for the flexibility. <br />•Lot widths <br />o The developer is proposing the lot width of all lots to be 50 feet, where 80 feet is <br />required in the Single Family Detached Residential (R-3) zoning district. <br />•Lot Size <br />o The developer is proposing the minimum lot size to be 6,500 square feet, where <br />10,400 square feet is required in the Single Family Detached Residential (R-3) <br />zoning district. <br />•Setbacks <br />o The developer is proposing the following setbacks: <br />R-3 Proposed PUD <br />Front yard setback 30 ft. 25 ft. <br />Side yard setback 10 ft. 7.5 ft. <br />Rear yard setback 30 ft. 25 ft. <br />•Impervious Surface <br />o The developer has not indicated that they are requesting flexibility for impervious <br />surface maximums. However, with the proposed lot width, lot size, and setbacks its <br />likely they will ask for flexibility on the percent of impervious surface allowed. <br />In exchange for the proposed PUD, the developer is expected to have a higher quality development <br />with valued amenities. The developer has proposed the following: <br />•The developer has stated that they will evaluate the site to preserve to the maximum extent <br />possible the sites natural features (wetland, floodplain, shoreland, etc). They stated they <br />are providing scenic view of the natural features. <br />•The developer stated that they will provide high quality architecture for the homes. <br />•The plans show a buffer area from the ditch and not having lot lines into the wetland and <br />natural areas, keeping them on outlots to limit impacts on the natural resources. <br />The Medium Density Residential designation’s primary intent is to respond to a need for smaller <br />homes on smaller lots and townhome development. This designation offers the opportunity for <br />housing that may expand opportunities for more affordable single family home living and changes <br />in demographics, including smaller homes for empty nesters and smaller families. The medium <br />density designation also describes the importance of preserving natural resources and amenities. <br />The proposed sketch plan is requesting flexibility to accommodate reduced lot sizes, lot widths, <br />and setbacks. This is in line with the intent of the land use present in the development. Staff has a <br />few recommendations at the end of this report for the development. It is in staff’s opinion that the <br />recommendations would strengthen the applicant’s ability to demonstrate they meet the PUD
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.