My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025.03.17 CC Packet
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2025 CC Packets
>
2025.03.17 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 1:13:46 PM
Creation date
3/18/2025 1:09:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
3/17/2025
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Capstone Homes (Munger Property) – Sketch Plan <br />dedicated with Oneka Place which is southwest the development. Currently, there is not a plan for <br />the passive park but a trail system existed within the park. Frog Hollow, in neighborhood park <br />service area 4, is to the south of the property about .8 miles away and the newly dedicated park in <br />Oneka Prairie and may be considered to be within walking distance. <br />The Trail Plan shows an existing trail extending from the south to 165th Street. The entire property <br />is shown as a part of the greenway corridor that follows the ditch. The developer has not shown <br />on their plan that they would extend the City’s trail system through the subdivision. This will need <br />to be included in the plans. <br />As a way to strengthen the developer’s ability to demonstrate they meet the PUD criteria the <br />developer could construct off-road trails to highlight the natural features on the site by providing <br />access and a recreation amenity. Natural surface, gravel or paved trails could be located adjacent <br />to stormwater ponds and/or the ditch corridor. <br />The Parks Commission provided non-binding feedback to the developer on February 19, 2025. <br />They stated that the development is served by the existing parks in the area and will not be required <br />to dedication land, however will be required to pay the fee. They stated they would support the <br />PUD with an off-road trail system within in the development. <br />Landscaping <br />The developer has not submitted a landscape plan. In exchange for PUD flexibility, the City could <br />expect a landscape plan that goes beyond the minimum requirements to provide street trees, <br />entrance streetscaping, plantings around any monument sign, plantings in open space, etc. <br />The developer should also provide a landscape buffer along 165th Street. <br />Wetlands <br />The developer has stated they have had an initial wetland delineation completed. It has not been <br />approved by the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) but will need to be approved prior to moving <br />forward. The developer has stated that they will evaluate the site to preserve to the maximum <br />extent possible the sites natural features (wetland, floodplain, shoreland, etc) as part of the PUD <br />request. The plan does show a few places for wetland impact for road connections. A wetland <br />replacement plan would need to be applied and approved by the TEP if the developer plans to <br />impact any wetlands on the site. This will be evaluated as the project moves forward. Staff has <br />recommended that the applicant schedule a preliminary TEP meeting. <br />Stormwater Management/Water Re-Use <br />The developer is proposing to complete stormwater management through the construction of ponds <br />within the site. Staff will be working with the developer, as this project moves forward, as it relates <br />to stormwater management, floodplain, and infiltration. <br />The developer has also indicated that they will not be using stormwater for irrigation purposes <br />within the development. Staff recommends this be evaluated to see if it is feasible. If the system is
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.