My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025.12.15 CC Minutes
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2025 CC Minutes
>
2025.12.15 CC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2026 11:33:00 AM
Creation date
1/7/2026 11:24:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/15/2025
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Council Meeting Minutes for December 15, 2025 <br />Page 8 of 11 <br />Erichson presented photos of the current condition of the streets that showed cracking, patching, <br />and distress around manholes. He stated that the project also includes the removal and <br />replacement of street lighting, trail improvements, and improvements at Water Tower Park. He <br />said there had been options discussed with residents along 130th Street, noting that residents on <br />both the north and south sides preferred to widen the roadway by four feet to the north. There <br />would be no room for a trail. <br /> <br />Erichson explained how the process outlined in MN Statute Chapter 429 requires a public <br />improvement hearing and assessment hearing. The City also had additional neighborhood <br />meetings. He explained the assessment policy and different options for payment. Property <br />owners have a right to object, and he noted that two letters were received from residents that will <br />become part of the minutes. <br /> <br />The estimated project cost was $4,690,400. According to the assessment policy last updated in <br />2013, the residential assessment for partial reconstruction would be $4,100 per unit and $2,100 <br />per unit for an urban roadway overlay. Commercial properties pay a higher rate. He noted that <br />the majority of project costs are paid by the City. Erichson presented a map of the assessment <br />area noting two areas. One was the residential area north of 130th Street and west of Fenway <br />Boulevard where there is no direct access. The frontage is owned by the homeowner’s <br />association. Those properties will not be assessed with this project, but when improvements take <br />place within the development they will be assessed one full unit. The other area he noted was <br />the residential properties along 140th Street North, and he pointed out that the two letters <br />received were from residents in that area. <br /> <br />Erichson provided information on construction impacts and the proposed project schedule. <br />There will be full closure on roadways that access Fenway Boulevard on the west side and one <br />way traffic on Fenway Boulevard. Half the road will be constructed at a time, allowing access to <br />businesses during construction. Construction will take about three months beginning in May or <br />June. If it is authorized this evening, plans will be prepared, and meetings will be held in late <br />January with residents and businesses. An assessment hearing will be held in March, before the <br />contract is awarded. <br /> <br />Mayor Weidt opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Jarard Torenvliet, 5436 140th Street North, stated he objected to the proposed assessment, <br />saying the road is in good condition and provides no direct benefit to his property. He said <br />improvements appear to benefit the industrial park. He stated he has had to close the windows <br />to reduce noise from the traffic. Torenvliet submitted a letter objecting to proposed assessments <br />that will be kept as part of the minutes. <br /> <br />Council Member Krull asked if his driveway is located on 140th Street North, and Mr. <br />Torenvliet replied it is. <br /> <br />Tyler Lessard, 14020 Finale Avenue North, stated he has lived there for 15 years, has young kids <br />and improvements will increase traffic to his neighborhood. He said businesses were not taking <br />care of the sidewalk so it’s unlikely it will be plowed. He said the road was perfectly fine with <br />no potholes or bumps. He had submitted a letter that is attached to these minutes, and he read his <br />letter out loud. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.