Laserfiche WebLink
• the parties have agreed to a $623 million regional water supply project to serve 13 <br />communities; and <br />• the parties have agreed to a new revenue generating mechanism through taxation, fees, or <br />other means to pay for operation of a new regional water supply project; and <br />• the agreement creates a requirement to establish a protective elevation for White Bear Lake; <br />and <br />• the agreement requires the DNR to use their "best efforts" to enforce through appropriation <br />permits new water use restrictions, conservation standards, and water rate structures; and <br />• the agreement requires implementation of a groundwater management area plan; and <br />WHEREAS, MN Statutes 103G.261 includes water allocation priorities, among them domestic <br />water supply, agricultural irrigation, and power production. Non-essential uses are assigned the <br />lowest priority, among which are recreational uses among others; and <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the City of Hugo does not support the <br />settlement agreement for the following reasons: <br />The entire predicate of the settlement agreement is speculative and premature. Current <br />science does not support or guarantee that implementation of the settlement agreement will <br />increase lake levels of White Bear Lake, <br />Extensive scientific study remains underway by the USGS and others concerning interaction <br />between ground waters and surface waters, and adopting a complex and expensive <br />regulatory framework which decreases availability and increases cost of municipal drinking <br />water is not warranted. <br />The "Project" which proposes to supply 13 communities with surface water drawn from <br />limited sources would require communities to connect to a regional water supply system as <br />a mandate. The City opposes this approach, as it wishes to maintain local control aver <br />important decisions that impact its citizens. <br />There are alternatives that likely would be more feasible, effective, and less costly than the <br />solutions outlined in the settlement. <br />0 The "Project" will considerably increase operating costs of the City's water utility. <br />Phase 2 communities do not benefit from the equitable cost sharing arrangements that Phase <br />I communities benefit from. <br />The City opposes the creation of a new taxing district or other fee structure to pay for <br />operation of a water supply system that does not serve the City. <br />The settlement concludes that all parties, including the DNR, agree that surface water should <br />be the source of water for the northeast metro. The DT's North and East Metro <br />Groundwater Management Area planning process has not been complete and has not <br />reached this conclusion. The agreement predetermines the outcome of the process, and <br />requires implementation of a plan without supporting facts or data or input from <br />stakeholders. <br />