Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> WILLIAM W NDERL-ICH - SPECIAL USE PERMIT TRANSFER <br /> Mr. Wunderlich requested that his Special use c'ermit to run a dog <br /> kennel be transferred to the proposed new owners. Mr. Schwab stated <br /> that Special Use Permits are issued to the property not to the owners. <br /> Mr. Leroux read minutes from the July 11, 1966 meeting at which time <br /> permission was granted to run a dog kennel. Special Use Permits were <br /> not given at that time. The Planning Commission felt that a Special <br /> Use Permit should be written up to protect the City and the new <br /> owners. Bill Schwab will draft a copy of the Special Use Permit and <br /> the Planning Commission will look at it on December 17th. <br /> Motion made by Peloquin, seconded by Leroux, to table the matter of <br /> the North Oaks' Special Use Permit until December 17th. Motion carried. <br /> ROY JAMESEN - SPECIAL USE PERMIT <br /> Mr. Ehret read application from Mr. Jamesen requesting a Special Use <br /> Permit to combine two units into one single dwelling. Mr. Ehret also <br /> read letter from Mr. Jamesen and Howard R. Green, Engineering Consultant <br /> from Cedar Rapids, I owa, regarding the septic system. Proof of ownership <br /> was provided. <br /> Mr. Schwab stated that the sewer system does not meet the city code. <br /> Dry wells are not allowed and 500 gallon septic tanks are not allowed. <br /> He also stated that the letter from the Howard R. Green Company was <br /> hypothetical. One of the drain fields is too close to the lake. By <br /> allowing this Special Use Permit would intensify the use of the property. <br /> Motion made by Johnson, seconded by Rosenquist, to disapprove the <br /> Jamesen Special Use Permit for the following reasons: <br /> 1 . Inadequate sewer system. <br /> 2. Keep from intensifying the use of the lake shore land. <br /> 3. Inadequate square footage of the proposed addition. <br /> Members for: Peloquin, Leroux, Ehret, Schl e tty, Johnson and Rosenquist. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> A discussion was held on the procedures and communication problems of <br /> the Planning Commission. It was decided that the following procedures <br /> will be followed: <br /> 1. Applications shall be submitted on or before the Thursday <br /> preceeding our meeting night with the City office to forward <br /> that application to the County Planner and any other applicable <br /> persons. <br /> 2. The City Clerk will instruct the applicants that if their in- <br /> formation is inadequate or incorrect, no action will be taken <br /> by the Planning Commission until the correct information is <br /> submitted at the following meeting. <br />