My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1973.04.25 PC Minutes
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1973 PC Minutes
>
1973.04.25 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2015 10:11:46 AM
Creation date
3/4/2015 9:47:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
4/25/1973
Document Type
Minutes
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• -2- <br /> In <br /> 2-In 1971 , the Village of Hugo was consolidated by merging with the town of <br /> Oneka . <br /> A Metropolitan Council population estimate in 1972 indicates that the popu- <br /> lation of the new community was 3 , 164 . Population projections have been <br /> prepared by the Council. <br /> Table I <br /> Population Projections for the V�ll.A e of Hugo <br /> Year Population <br /> 1970 • 2669 <br /> 1980 4700 <br /> 1990 8600 <br /> 2000 17,300 <br /> 2010 . 28,700 <br /> • <br /> Hugo is basically an agricultural community; the eastern two-thirds of the <br /> Village is undeveloped, the western third is more densely populated and <br /> more non-farm homes occupy the land. <br /> COMPREHENSIVE, PLAN REVIEW <br /> 1 . Physical Development Structure <br /> The topography of the village is generally flat in the western half, while <br /> rolling and hilly in the eastern half. The large part of Hugo is located within the <br /> Rice Creek Watershed; the western half of the Village is crossed by the Hardwood <br /> Creek which drains in Peltier Lake. <br /> Large portions of the village are wetland and low land with high water <br /> table unsuitable for development. The Comprehensive Plan indicates areas. un- <br /> suitable for buildings . However, a close look at Washington County soil survey <br /> maps for the area shows that the comprehensive plan represents only the area's <br /> most obviously unsuitable such as marshes, peat areas, hut fails to indicate <br /> other areas of soils such as Isanti and Bluffton characterized by a highwater table. <br /> (See Appendix 2 and 3) . <br /> Staff has prepared a list of the soils occurring within. Tiugo and classified <br /> them as to their suitability for buildings . (See Appendix 4) <br /> The soil information can be obtained from the Washington Soil and Water <br /> Conservation District office in Stillwater. <br /> The comprehensive plan has used the Metrop,lila i Sewer Bcard District <br /> 1 boundary as the demarcation line between urban end rural districts; the urban <br /> district being within Sewer District 1 . <br /> Unfortunately, the western half of the Village, designated as "urban • <br /> district" all to be severed first, has very extensive areas of soils with an ex- <br /> tremely h1'_th water table . These soils have severe limitations for development. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.